Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's how evolution proceeds as well--from the bottom up. Each incremental change is built on the previous ones.From the bottom up. Not magic. Its planned.
From the bottom up. Not magic. Its planned.
Nope. If you take out a single stone, the arch will collapse,
are you saying that this arch was made stepwise by a natural process?
No, I'm saying that it's impossible to build step-wise and therefore was clearly created by magic. Possibly by a wizard.
actually the bacteria already has all the genes required to this ability:Here is demonstrated experiment how bacteria learned in steps to eat citrate. It evolved.
Bacteria learn new trick
In a state of the art intelligently designed lab. Elephant in the room. None of it demonstrates any start of sexual reproduction. It is asexual. It is all bacteria. It is micro not in dispute even by 6 day Creationists.Here is demonstrated experiment how bacteria learned in steps to eat citrate. It evolved.
Bacteria learn new trick
Pretty sure they were human, am I right?Could you explicitly identify your ancestors from 1500 years ago?
If not, do you think they are imaginary?
It is micro not in dispute even by 6 day Creationists.
No mystery here. The 'part' needed for temporary support is removed after the keystone is in place.
In a state of the art intelligently designed lab.
Ah yes, scaffolding. Interesting concept. I'm curious as to why IDists never consider that as an option when attempting to claim that step-wise evolution is impossible...
The scaffolding has been observed, unlike the missing parts needed for step-by-step evolution.
What is interesting to me is why science isn't able to see the diminishing odds of evolution as more complexity is discovered.
At some point they have to throw up their hands and say....Nowwaddaminut!
It's actually inconsistent with the bible.Why do you suppose that evolution excludes divine Telos? Evolutionary biologists don't make that claim.
No, it is only incompatible with fundamentalist Evangelical Protestant theism.
Actually creation belief is not Protestant minority. It actually comes from the 1st century believers and the apostles. The belief in evolution from a common ancestor is the "new" belief.False. Trying to make the creation/evolution discussion into a cosmic struggle between theism and atheism is shabby and useless. Just because the theory of evolution upsets the theology of a 19th century Protestant minority pop-up sect doesn't make it atheistic.
As interpreted by fundamentalist Evangelical Protestant theists.
[Staff edit]. The Apostles did not believe that the scriptures were the literal, inerrant, perspicuous and self-interpreting product of plenary verbal inspiration. Most Christians still don't, whether they believe in common ancestry or not, even those who accept the Genesis stories as historical.Actually creation belief is not Protestant minority. It actually comes from the 1st century believers and the apostles. The belief in evolution from a common ancestor is the "new" belief.
You keep saying the same mantra. But that doesn't make it true. The apostles believed in creation as taught in Genesis as did many of the church fathers as I have point d out before. It's time you put that old argument and disdain aside. It's NOT a new belief.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?