What does evolution say about this?

[philadiddle]

The circulatory system is an organ system that moves nutrients, gases, and wastes to and from cells to help fight diseases and help stabilize body temperature and pH to maintain homeostasis. This system may be seen strictly as a blood distribution network, but some consider the circulatory system as composed of the cardiovascular system, which distributes blood, and the lymphatic system, which distributes lymph. While humans, as well as other vertebrates, have a closed cardiovascular system (meaning that the blood never leaves the network of arteries, veins and capillaries), some invertebrate groups have an open cardiovascular system. The most primitive animal phyla lack circulatory system. The lymphatic system, on the other hand, is an open system.

The main components of the human circulatory system are the heart, the blood, and the blood vessels. The circulatory system includes: the pulmonary circulation, a "loop" through the lungs where blood is oxygenated; and the systemic circulation, a "loop" through the rest of the body to provide oxygenated blood. An average adult contains five to six quarts (roughly 4.7 to 5.7 litres) of blood, which consists of plasma, red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. Also, the digestive system works with the circulatory system to provide the nutrients the system needs to keep the heart pumping.

Two types of fluids move through the circulatory system: blood and lymph. The blood, heart, and blood vessels form the cardiovascular system. The lymph, lymph nodes, and lymph vessels form the lymphatic system. The cardiovascular system and the lymphatic system collectively make up the circulatory system.

So what is ur response to the OP?

 

[Sphinx777]

So what is ur response to the OP?

​

Knowledge!!!




​

 

[&Abel]

​

Knowledge!!!




​

truth of this world is not really truth if it distracts from the only truth that matters

especially when we think we understand a lot more than we actually do

 

[Assyrian]

From the quote above Warren made it clear that " no modern biologist would dare suggest that a frog or alligator is a step en route to an eagle or human being" yet they will turn away and try to them to support their story telling.

You realise Warren is talking about modern frogs and alligators here? He is telling us not to make the mistake of thinking mammals and bird evolved from modern amphibians and reptiles. That does not mean we cannot learn about the evolution the heart from other animals we share a common ancestor with.

We are not descended from our cousins and second cousins, yet geneticists can study how genetic diseases spread through a family from grandparents and great grandparents by looking at the cousins and second cousins we are not descended from.

 

[herev]

We are not descended from our cousins and second cousins, yet geneticists can study how genetic diseases spread through a family from grandparents and great grandparents by looking at the cousins and second cousins we are not descended from.

 

[Smidlee]

You realise Warren is talking about modern frogs and alligators here? He is telling us not to make the mistake of thinking mammals and bird evolved from modern amphibians and reptiles. That does not mean we cannot learn about the evolution the heart from other animals we share a common ancestor with.

I thought it's very clear he was referring to some past mythological heart that may have never existed and didn't believe a modern day two chambered heart transformed to a modern day three-chambered and finally to a modern day four-chambered heart. They know this would sound completely silly. It's the same with Darwin's "the little eyeball that could" story.

 

[philadiddle]

I thought it's very clear he was referring to some past mythological heart that may have never existed and didn't believe a modern day two chambered heart transformed to a modern day three-chambered and finally to a modern day four-chambered heart. They know this would sound completely silly. It's the same with Darwin's "the little eyeball that could" story.

You can't be serious. I think you're just trying to get a rise out of people. Your constant badgering about faith in the myth of evolution is just a little too ignorant to sound real.

 

[Assyrian]

I thought it's very clear he was referring to some past mythological heart that may have never existed and didn't believe a modern day two chambered heart transformed to a modern day three-chambered and finally to a modern day four-chambered heart. They know this would sound completely silly. It's the same with Darwin's "the little eyeball that could" story.

Of course they think it sounds silly. But what they say sound silly is thinking three and four chambered hearts evolved from modern two chamber hearts. You quotation here completely misunderstands the point he is making. Because Warren thinks an anachronistic view of heart evolution is silly, doesn't mean he thinks heart evolution is silly.

 

[29apples]

It was probably the heart that was first. Insects are a good example, with an open circulatory system. They have a heart, but lack any arteries or veins.

Edit: Sphinx is correct and first, therefor deserves the credit.

 

[DiligoImmortalus]

None can operate independently, so the difference might solely be the rate at which they developed.

 

[The Lady Kate]

Because God doesn't leave anything to chance. He knows the beginning from the end, and He is predictable because He doesn't change. It we will read His word and pray He will show Himself to whoever seeks to know Him more.

Oh, by the way casting of lots wasn't by chance, but was prophesied in the OT as something that would come to pass.

So there's no reason to believe that evolution is chance, either. It may appear chance to us, but not to God, who knew all along what the final result would be.

Or one of the most important products of creation is the similarities put there by the Creator, who spoke all things into existence.

How is that important?

If evolution isn't a mater of chance then something/someone had to make it do what happened, but that isn't what we are told. We are told that something was here, but we don't know what it was or how it got here, and from that something one cell things became two celled thing, etc.

because that's all we know for certain, or can prove with the tools available to us. God is not something that can be proven... or disproven... in a lab.

What do we see next? We see very very smart people believe something so totally stupid, just because they can't wrap their mind around the fact that a Creator would create this great world so that He could be loved and that He could show His wonderful love.

I'm pretty smart, and I've got no difficulty wrapping my mind around God using evolution to create life here on Earth... for whatever reason He chooses.