• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What do you think the Mark of the Beast is?? And what is sin about it?

Sabertooth

Repartee Animal: Quipping the Saints!
Site Supporter
Jul 25, 2005
10,757
7,227
63
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,131,009.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
...them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands;...
Economic exclusion was, at least, the first form of persecution...
 
Upvote 0

throughfiierytrial

Truth-Lover
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2014
2,916
813
✟639,042.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Context is clear that the buying and selling is what people do in the kingdom of the beast not what Christians do with their faith in Christ. One cannot buy or sell faith in Christ, only have it or throw it away for faith in another christ.
Buying and selling faith in Christ is a manner of speaking...which Jesus uses by the way in Revelation 3:18. You aren't reading correctly yet in my view. This is a revelation and revelations need to be made plain...they are not meant to read strictly literally. Notice Jesus pointing out His symbolism in Revelation.
 
Upvote 0

Sabertooth

Repartee Animal: Quipping the Saints!
Site Supporter
Jul 25, 2005
10,757
7,227
63
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,131,009.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Sorry, no. Participating will be or may be sin, just like gambling or watching a hollywood movie or getting involved in politics,
but unbelief is the sin that condemns.
I agree that getting the mark will be sin, but to insist that it will be a welfare state, you will have to tear "...that no one may buy or sell except..." out of your Bible.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
I agree that getting the mark will be sin, but to insist that it will be a welfare state, you will have to tear "...that no one may buy or sell except..." out of your Bible.
Oh, I see what you mean --- no, buying and selling WITH THE MARK , because they TRUSTED IN THE SYSTEM- they WORK within the devil's system (many do today),
working at jobs in government, corporations, military, education, worst of all medical or religious, TRUSTING THE SYSTEM - receiving the mark SO THEY CAN WORK in the system....

Only those who refuse to receive the mark might be saved.
 
Reactions: Sabertooth
Upvote 0

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Site Supporter
Nov 5, 2011
45,343
6,884
✟1,018,048.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single


Well I disagree that the buying and selling has anything to do with faith in Christ. It doesn't match the context at all. It is about buying and selling goods. The people that take the mark are not Christians. If they had been Christians, they abandoned that faith for a new and false faith in a false God. The ones that refuse the mark are Christians and they did not buy or sell that faith.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
you said you believe in pre-mill rapture and that the secret rapture idea is not supported in the Bible.

I said
BobRyan said:
ok so no secret rapture - but still a 1 Thess 4:13-17 rapture at the 2nd coming -- called the 2nd coming event of Rev 19.

I understand that. I don't know why you feel the need to point that out to me. It's as though you think I only have a basic understanding of Scripture. FYI, I have been studying the Bible since 1996.

I was only restating what you already stated for clarification so that you can either say that this is indeed your position or not.

In this case I happen to agree with that much of it.

It wasn't necessary for you to do that.

It wasn't necessary for me to make sure I understood your statement?

Interesting.

Perhaps if you would change your approach there would be no misunderstanding of your intentions. There were no question marks, but only a doctrinal statement. If you want to know what a person believes, then ask a question.

you did not ask a question in the post I was responding to -- I saw a point of agreement and posted it . to you. you were free to either agree or find a point where you have differences since I place both your statement and mine side-by-side. They looked the same to me.

I still have yet to see you agree or differ with that basic type of post ( other than to complain that it exists, which I find curious)
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

I think we all agree that there is nothing in Rev 13 about "buying and selling faith"
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You must realize that it is the "buying and selling" of one's faith in Christ which will cause you to have the mark of the beast.

But there is no "buying and selling faith" in Rev 13.

What is more the "beast" is the one stopping folks from "buying and selling" in Rev 13.
 
Upvote 0

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
4,085
3,104
Midwest
✟374,509.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Reactions: ewq1938
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Amen brother and it absolutely blows my mind how certain people can actually believe the ludicrous doctrine that near the end of time the "mark of the best" of Revelation 14 will be placed upon those who worship on Sunday instead of Saturday.

The OP requests that participants on this thread post what they think is the mark of the beast in Rev 13... simply condemning other people is not saying what you think the mark of the beast is in Rev 13 ... or what about it is sin. I think we can all see that clearly.

Or are you saying that the you have "nothing" when it comes to an answer and your only info is that you know of another view which is a much-more-detailed-than-nothing option out there, that you do not agree with??
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
What is interesting is that we keep seeing this option - posted on page 1 come up when people are asked what "they" believe is the mark of the beast in Rev 13 and what about it is a sin.


Amen brother and it absolutely blows my mind how certain people can actually believe the ludicrous doctrine that near the end of time the "mark of the best" of Revelation 14 will be placed upon those who ...

And they post that or reference it - while saying this is not their own view and does not agree with their own view. So then ... what is their view??? The point of the thread is not simply to "identify one future scenario that you do not agree with"
 
Upvote 0

woobadooba

Legend
Sep 4, 2005
11,307
914
✟25,191.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is getting ridiculous. Why do you argue so much? Why are you so defensive? You seem to have control issues.

It seems hard for you to admit you are wrong. Perhaps this might be why you are having trouble getting along with certain people in here. You come across as prideful. People generally don't like that kind of attitude. I think you need to change your approach.

Some snowflake will probably report me for telling you these things, but I feel it needs to be said. Honesty is important.
 
Upvote 0

throughfiierytrial

Truth-Lover
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2014
2,916
813
✟639,042.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Again, this is a manner of speaking which you are becoming all entangled in by trying to read it literally. Revelations have to be made plain, they are riddle-like in nature as in the book of Daniel...the language of or rather interpretation of Revelation too must be made plain/interpreted. It is quite easy once one begins because one can see the nature of the riddle. All Scripture here is interpreted by Scripture. One can generally readily see how it goes together once you get started..much like putting together an easy puzzle.
Again, I offer you this one precious clue...you cannot go literal. Jesus shows us this when He points out the representations of the stars and the candlesticks in the introduction.
 
Upvote 0

throughfiierytrial

Truth-Lover
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2014
2,916
813
✟639,042.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But there is no "buying and selling faith" in Rev 13.

What is more the "beast" is the one stopping folks from "buying and selling" in Rev 13.

Revelation is basically a summary of the faith...not really an account all its own. There need be no description of some buying and selling faith for it to be so, the breaking of the riddle leaves you with the core nugget and fits with the rest of the scenario. The beast does not stop people from buying and selling, he, leaves them with the mark if the do buy and sell. As Christians we only buy from Christ that pure gold He speaks of here in Revelation and we do not sell it, must not sell it or we are doomed/damned and receive the mark of the beast. It is how you are reading it that is becoming what I see as a stumbling block for you.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
The people that take the mark are not Christians.
A lot of "Christians", every sunday church goers, have said they will take the mark, or are already living as if they did. A lot of pastors/teachers/ evangelists said publicly it is not the 'mark' so to do so - to go along with the government and even yes, get the chip. And some even said, contrary to all Scripture - "Don't worry if you take it" if it is the mark, you can repent later at your leisure and still get to heaven...
No one dares say they are not Christians.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Have you read in Scripture that reads "UNCOMPROMISING RIGHTEOUSNESS" ?
It is accurately in some translations.

It is necessary (or at least good and best and cleanest) for life, salvation , faith, and testimony of Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Revelation is basically a summary of the faith.

??
There need be no description of some buying and selling faith for it to be so,

??

So then we can insert that anywhere we feel like it.


The beast does not stop people from buying and selling

So then everywhere it says that the beast does do that -- we just insert "not" in front of it??

As Christians we only buy from Christ that pure gold He speaks of here in Revelation and we do not sell it, must not sell

So then we "join the beast" in that "not sell" ??

That looks like a lot of creative writing.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
you said you believe in pre-mill rapture and that the secret rapture idea is not supported in the Bible.

I said
BobRyan said:
ok so no secret rapture - but still a 1 Thess 4:13-17 rapture at the 2nd coming -- called the 2nd coming event of Rev 19.

(Because it looked like we are saying the same thing... obviously)

I understand that. I don't know why you feel the need to point that out to me. It's as though you think I only have a basic understanding of Scripture. FYI, I have been studying the Bible since 1996.

I was only restating what you already stated for clarification so that you can either say that this is indeed your position or not.

In this case I happen to agree with that much of it.

It wasn't necessary for you to do that.

It wasn't necessary for me to make sure I understood your statement?

Interesting.

Perhaps if you would change your approach there would be no misunderstanding of your intentions. There were no question marks, but only a doctrinal statement. If you want to know what a person believes, then ask a question.

you did not ask a question in the post I was responding to -- I saw a point of agreement and posted it . to you. you were free to either agree or find a point where you have differences since I place both your statement and mine side-by-side. They looked the same to me.

I still have yet to see you agree or differ with that basic type of post ( other than to complain that it exists, which I find curious)

This is getting ridiculous. Why do you argue so much?

When we look calmly and rationally at the post trail above - it is an example of me agreeing with your post and then you doing a great job of "agreeing disagreeably" which I keep saying I don't understand your logic in going down that path.

if you wouldn't mind dialing down the ad hominem a tiny bit -- this could be a good discussion.

It seems hard for you to admit you are wrong.

Ok so then you are saying that maybe I should not have agreed with you so fast???... hmm I had not considered that option but you are making a pretty good case for it. I may end up agreeing with you on that point as well.
 
Upvote 0

woobadooba

Legend
Sep 4, 2005
11,307
914
✟25,191.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Have you read in Scripture that reads "UNCOMPROMISING RIGHTEOUSNESS" ?
It is accurately in some translations.

It is necessary (or at least good and best and cleanest) for life, salvation , faith, and testimony of Jesus.
I am not asking for moral compromise, but a genuine openness to receive correction. I use the word "genuine" because in many cases where I have heard people say they are open to correction if it can be shown they are in error, when the time came to test them on that, they didn't change their view but even more firmly insisted on being right when they were blatantly wrong. That's called self-righteousness.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

woobadooba

Legend
Sep 4, 2005
11,307
914
✟25,191.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok so then you are saying that maybe I should not have agreed with you so fast???... hmm I had not considered that option but you are making a pretty good case for it. I may end up agreeing with you on that point as well.
I already explained what I meant. Unfortunately, I can't help you get the point you missed. So this is where the discussion ends for us.
 
Upvote 0