Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So can a woman keep male concubines? Or is this solely the domain of Macho Man Incorporated?
Seeing as I view women as people, not property, I'm going to have to give my big thumbs down on the whole idea.
-CryptoLutheran
that is not the hebrew/biblical meaning though.
. Rom 4:15 . .where no commandments exist; there is no transgression.
As cool as it probably sounds, even unlimited concubines never satisfied King Solomon.
DamainWarS,
I don't get how you say that Midian is in Cush?
Unger - Midian is south and east of Palistine. This is where Moses traveled to when he left Eygpt.
Cush is south of Eygpt. If you read Jpsephus' account of Moses you will read that Moses, while a "son" of the King of Eygpt, took a trip south up the Nile River to fight with the Cush ites.
That to me is probably a 1000 miles apart!
dayhiker
For the love of God...I'm going to ignore this one.He most certainly did establish a new religion. That is as much a fact as the Golden Gate Bridge is in the state of California.
When God tells us specifically to do something and we choose not to listen and do the opposite (even though it is not strictly said so) then it is sin. Each husband is to have his own wife, each wife is to have her own husband, anything else that we think outside of that...is sin.Hey! You're stealing my point. If God has not specifically told us that a behavior is sinful...and that behavior is compatible with the "Royal Law" of love (see James)...then it isn't a sin! Hello.
He told us what we shouldn't worry about:Yeshua commanded us NOT to worry (Matthew 6:25). Is it a sin if we worry?
Moving on from this subject. It's baseless.Like I said...they didn't claim to know the day OR the hour...but we are given instruction on how to identify the season...and they got that wrong.
No where in scripture did it say that those who actually PENNED the scripture altered the text and therefore, I'm not going to look at the bible as if it's falsified. If you read the scriptures, you would wonder to yourself why it describes humans in such a way. We are not looked upon as impeccable, good, honest and decent humans beings, it showcases us as we are SINNERS who needed Christ to die for us so that we can be forgiven and have a personal relationship with God.I agree...that doesn't put their apostleship in jeopardy...but it means we must carefully consider everything in the Bible...especially given the scribes penchant for altering the text.
What is your point?By the "Bible" I assume you're referring to II Timothy? Who authored II Timothy? Does it matter? When was it authored and what was going on in Christendom when it was authored?
If we are talking about scribes falsifying scripture than something should go off in one's head that says "if someone claim something is falsified then they must have compared it to the original and see the falsification." So therefore, we know that there were originals. I'm sure the falsified scriptures would not actually contain a section that says "these scribes falsified this particular document" so if we are reading a certain scripture that tells that the scribes were falsifying documents why should we assume that it is this particular doctrine that is being falsified?It said "the lying pen of the scribes". In other words...what they wrote. They altered the text to mean something that was not 1:1 with God.
I don't care if the practice was stilling going on. I am not told in the New Testament that men can have more than one wife or that wife can have more than one husband. I am told that each husband should have his own wife and each wife should have her own husband and that is what I will go by and I'm not going to sit here and say oh yeah, it's okay to have concubines when we are under the NEW COVENANT.That practice occurred through NT times as well and has been proven by Biblical Scholars.
Those copies of copies of copies say the same thing, therefore I'm going with the word of God.They can used methods to reconstruct a text which is closest to the original letter as possible...but there is still no way of knowing for sure since NONE of the original letters have been recovered...just copies of copies of copies during a time when literacy was extremely low...there were no copy machines and some of the scribes had an agenda. Just sayin'....
First show me in scripture those who had romantic love in polygamy? You always see one husband love one wife and tolerate the other and have babies...But again, I don't care if you can find 1,000 families that have romantic love in polygamy, I'm going to follow what NT tells me to.Romantic love? Are you saying that romantic love is incompatible with polygamy? You'd have to tell that to the folks in successful polygamous relationships who are happy. But...to be sure...I wasn't talking about romantic love. I was talking about 1 Corinthians 13 love.
Then don't watch TV. I don't care.Under what new covenant are we told that watching TV is okay? God generally tells us what NOT to do...and there is no prohibition of polygamy anywhere in the text.
Don't care, bathing have no barring on my salvation. If you never want to bath in your life, that is your choice, but bathing or not has nothing to do with salvation. However telling people that polygamy is okay when under the new covenant we are told one husband, one wife, now that is a salvation issue because instead of someone struggling with sin , they are now living in sin and embracing it.Under what example do we see that bathing twice in one day is okay in the NT?
CC
Domain,
The way I read your arguement is taht you denied what the Word of God says. Your right that the Bible doesn't make an arguement for poly. I also can't find a scripture that says 1 man and 1 woman. I have no problem with a couple staying monogomous. Neither does God. In the same sense I can't find a vese that says God has any problem with poly relationships. We have the Bible clearly saying Moses had 3 wives. Yet you blow these off. I can't blow off what the Bible says personally.
Dayhiker
Hi Amor,
.. a few wives isn't multipling. When God spoke against Solomon isn't wasn't that he has a lot of wives but that he allowed the wives to worship their idols in the land and Solomon also was invovled with the idols.
To understand the 10 concubines one has to understand that Absalom has consired against David and part of his challange was having sex with these 10 women in front of Isreal. So David stopped his relationship with them because they had commited adultery.
I just reread the account:
2 Sam.15:16 David has fled Jerusalem and leaves 10 concubines in his house.
2 Sam.16:21-22 Ahithophei advises Absalom to go into his father's concubines. A tent is set up on top of the house where Absalom goes into his father's concubines in front of all Isreal.
This act was a well recognized challenge to David's authority. Basically saying see how weak David is. He can't even protect his 10 concubines. I, Absalom am the power and authority in Jerusalem now.
This is reading our view back into Malichi. Moses had 3 wives and he wrote Gen.2 that 1st speaks of a couple becoming one. Moses clearly didn't consider that oneness as teaching monogamy like preachers try to say it does.
Even God says He is a polygamist Ez.
got to go
dayhiker
hi dayhiker
im going to have to look all this stuff up & read about it properly.. this thread has me curious now..
then again if its acceptable im thinking of moving to marquesas islands.. where women have male concubinesshhhhh...
If you say there is no argument for polygamy in the bible then why are you biblically defending it?
Your right that the Bible doesn't make an arguement for poly
I'll defend anything that is not a sin that we are free to do.
Notice this disagreement is not over murder. The text is clear on murder. The text is clear on a lot of things...but it is not clear that polygamy is a sin.
what is this text you are referring to?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?