I asked you questions – you made it personal.
And what is your opinion of the issue? That it’s sinful, perhaps? Then you have condemned masturbation, even if the only basis you have to do so is your own fickle opinion.
Not by your descriptions, suggesting those who disagree with you and participate in the thing you dislike are “shameful” among other negative descriptions. You presented it as something far more important than a mere fancy in preference.
So those who do this are… stupid? Again, your words, suggesting this is not merely a matter of preference to you.
I’m not trying to drag you anywhere – I’m merely pointing out the redeeming aspects of masturbation; aspects some people don’t want to consider. Don’t want to take part in these positive aspects? Fine by me.
No one has ever presented masturbation as a “have-to-do thing,” only that it is a “permissible-to-do thing.” I shot back at you for describing those who do it as shameful or unable to have healthy sexual relations with other people. Those are accusations worthy of a defense – don’t be shocked when one is given.
When someone wants to stand there pointing her condemning finger at others in an effort to make them feel guilty for being what they are (sexual beings), it is cause for rebellion. I will not allow such people to throw chains of guilt on people for enjoying what is theirs by right.
This divide, friend, was not drawn by me or other free men and women. It was drawn by the hostile piety condemning masturbation as sinful, likening those who do it to promiscuis people, accusing them of being selfish and dumb, incapable of distinguishing between the voice of God and Satan, and more. Divide? Oh, yes, there's a divide and its cause was the aggression of the prosecution in this matter.