Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
what do scientists think about fate and destiny
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MasterYourLife" data-source="post: 74261099" data-attributes="member: 420589"><p>That was a post-cursor point for the 2 extremes of scientific opinion. </p><p>Some of the worlds top scientists (on an given extreme), approach theories with the view that either God exists or doesn't. </p><p>This is in fact what persuaded the existence of science. Early scientists pursued science, because their basis was that if God exists, there must be order in nature and thus testable. </p><p>In areas of science where there is no proof via observation and testing, there only remains room for theories based on evidence. </p><p>A scientist that see's evidence for God, will adjust their theory towards creation. Otherwise an atheist will adjust towards a random unintelligent process. </p><p>The fact they are scientists does not mean they won't have opinions, or don't have a right to disagree on theories. At some point they become philosophers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MasterYourLife, post: 74261099, member: 420589"] That was a post-cursor point for the 2 extremes of scientific opinion. Some of the worlds top scientists (on an given extreme), approach theories with the view that either God exists or doesn't. This is in fact what persuaded the existence of science. Early scientists pursued science, because their basis was that if God exists, there must be order in nature and thus testable. In areas of science where there is no proof via observation and testing, there only remains room for theories based on evidence. A scientist that see's evidence for God, will adjust their theory towards creation. Otherwise an atheist will adjust towards a random unintelligent process. The fact they are scientists does not mean they won't have opinions, or don't have a right to disagree on theories. At some point they become philosophers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
what do scientists think about fate and destiny
Top
Bottom