Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
What did it all started with?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SLP" data-source="post: 75977121" data-attributes="member: 2880"><p>For someone so devoted to empirical science and following the evidence to wherever it leads (as you imply), you sure are quick to abandon that framework when your Faith articles are in question. Instead of following the evidence, you - in a heart beat - employ logical fallacies like begging the question. Not impressive.</p><p></p><p>Placing yourself in that group, eh? Interesting.</p><p></p><p>Times change. Religions no longer have the stranglehold on society that they did in their times - at least among the successful scientists of today. I suspect that had Planck been born 100 years later, and been such a skeptic of atheism as you claim, he would rank right up there with Jon Sarfati and Jon Wells....</p><p>Odd that the evidence did not point them to a literal bible. In fact, Planck once wrote:</p><p></p><p>"...the faith in miracles must yield, step by step, before the steady and firm advance of the facts of science, and its total defeat is undoubtedly a matter of time."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SLP, post: 75977121, member: 2880"] For someone so devoted to empirical science and following the evidence to wherever it leads (as you imply), you sure are quick to abandon that framework when your Faith articles are in question. Instead of following the evidence, you - in a heart beat - employ logical fallacies like begging the question. Not impressive. Placing yourself in that group, eh? Interesting. Times change. Religions no longer have the stranglehold on society that they did in their times - at least among the successful scientists of today. I suspect that had Planck been born 100 years later, and been such a skeptic of atheism as you claim, he would rank right up there with Jon Sarfati and Jon Wells.... Odd that the evidence did not point them to a literal bible. In fact, Planck once wrote: "...the faith in miracles must yield, step by step, before the steady and firm advance of the facts of science, and its total defeat is undoubtedly a matter of time." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
What did it all started with?
Top
Bottom