Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
According to evolution what happened is that fishes and humans have a common ancestor.so a fish cant evolve into human too? but this what already happened according to evolution.
so a fish cant evolve into human too? but this what already happened according to evolution.
Oh really? Have you been swimming among ichtyosauri lately? Seen some living trilobites? What about the dorudon?But the fossil evidence that is purported to be millions of years old shows fossilised sea life that is exactly the same as we see still alive today, and this shows that these organisms have never evolved, so based on that evidence, evolution for all the different types of sea life observed in the fossil remains stopped millions of years ago. So if it stopped for those, then it must have stopped for everything.
Just for your information most cave paintings (Lascaux, Alta Mira etc) are dated 40.000 years old. The oldest one is in Caceres, Spain and is 64.000 years old. Not millions of years old.Authentic cave drawings that are supposed to show men living million of years ago show also domestic animals exactly the same as they are today, along with humans exactly the same, so we can conclude that domestic animal and human evolution ceased millions of years ago as well.
i'll give you the credit of the doubt, but "professional creationists", like Kent Hovind, Ken Ham, Ray Comfort etc have all been found lying. Repeatedly.Also, when you call those who disagree with you liars, then you show intolerance, and this weakens and discredits your argument.
But not a modern fish. You are proposing that modern creatures evolve into each other.so a fish cant evolve into human too? but this what already happened according to evolution.
To be fair which ultimately evolved from fish. But of course not modern fish.No, humans didn't evolve from fish. They evolved from earlier primates.
Our esteemed colleague Xianghua is a devout Platonist. The distinction you are making is unimportant to him.To be fair which ultimately evolved from fish. But of course not modern fish.
To be fair which ultimately evolved from fish. But of course not modern fish.
i never said anything about "modern".
and these earlier primates eventually evolved from a fish. not directly of course but their ancestor was a fish. so yes- fish evolved into human in many small steps.
that was a fish.
and these earlier primates eventually evolved from a fish. not directly of course but their ancestor was a fish. so yes- fish evolved into human in many small steps.
Ironically it is the "odds argument" that creationists try to use against evolution that shows how the idea of a cat evolving into a dog is impossible. It does of course not prove that evolution is impossible, only their strawman version of evolution is refuted.Not a modern fish. Ancestral fish from which tetrapods evolved (and eventually diversified into animals) are not the same as modern extant species of fish today.
Modern fish will not eventually evolve into humans.
When you claim that a dog can evolve into a cat (or vise-versa), you're effectively claiming that modern extant species can evolve into one another. That demonstrates a complete misunderstanding of how evolution works. Modern extant species do not evolve into one another.
Equivalent to be taken seriously, better to be considered viable.Come up with a scientific theory that has equivalent or better explanatory* power
I'm not sure that this equates to 'God did it'. To me, if it were the case that we are in a unique position in the cosmos for life, then this is no more a genuine theory than is 'the mud puddle resides in a hole just big enough for it to fit in' theory.I do not know of any Young Earth Creationism model, but progressive creationists like RTB try to postulate some models:
RTB claims to have a scientific model predicting an increase in astronomical evidence that Earth resides at the ideal location in the cosmos for both harboring advanced civilization and technology and making the universe observable.[6] Nontheistic models predict that astronomical discoveries will show that Earth is unremarkable for both habitability and observation.
The RTB model also predicts that as scientists continue to research the causes and effects of plate tectonics, their findings will reveal evidence for the fine-tuning required for long-lasting, stable plate-tectonic activity on a planet with a thin atmosphere.
The RTB model predicts that future anthropological and genetic research will increasingly confirm that humans are biologically distinct rather than descended from a hominid species. It predicts stronger evidence for humanity's genetic, anatomical, and behavioral uniqueness. It places the earliest hominids at 6.5 million years ago and the first humans at around fifty thousand years ago.
RTB also predicts that the flood of Noah was a local event. There is some evidence for a large flood in modern day Iraq around 2900 BC
Reasons to Believe - Wikipedia
But I just googled it, so I have no further info.
How is it that you think that counts as a scientific model?I'm amazed at the amount of information in our DNA.
I'm amazed at how a cell functions.
How is information received if not by an intelligent being?
Then you are just easily amused, not a scientific thinker at all.The elegance and complexity of life is enough evidence of creation for me.
And you do that by...? Coughing up cash at your megachurch? Blaming disasters on the gays? Church attendance is down. Affiliation with a Christian religion is down.We don't need to "win" an argument about the creation. We need to win souls for Christ.
That isn't what he wrote. But that is a good cop out.You want a creationist to tell you an explanation that doesn't involve 'God making stuff'? Do you know what creationism is?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?