Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have seen in other posts that evolution is said to be just a fairy tale trying to explain what might have happened, and I have not seen any posts giving proof that it is otherwise.
This is a discussion forum. Your refusal to discuss matters on a discussion forum is not futile. It is discourteous and raises unflattering suspicions as to your motives. Great advertisement for how to live a Christian life.Nothing like a good exercise in futility, I guess.
Patience. Do you have any idea how long it takes to fake a convincing photo-shop rendition, corrupt half a dozen Wikipedia pages and set up a false website for a putative Mid-Western University? These aren't Presidential tweets that can be tossed off in a couple of minutes and denied a week later.Still waiting for the cave drawings of humans hunting dinosaurs.
Did you miss the earlier one? It was a hoot!Still waiting for the cave drawings of humans hunting dinosaurs.
I have seen in other posts that evolution is said to be just a fairy tale trying to explain what might have happened, and I have not seen any posts giving proof that it is otherwise.
the source.
It's an erroneous assumption you are making. The theory of evolution does not predict any such event. With evolution, the only taxon forming event is speciation. The higher taxa are human constructs designed to classify the results of repeated speciation.evolution at the level of family (say a cat to a dog) is indeed just an assumption.
Then why have you not produced any?on the other hand we have evidence for design in nature.
Is there any evidence of intentional manufacture? A "self-replicating robot even with DNA" is not, in itself, evidence of design (allowing for your illiterate definition of "robot").think about this argument: say that we will see a self replicating robot ( lets say even with dna) on a far planet. do we need to conclude design or a natural process in this case?
No, we do not. You just made that up. But a natural process does not exclude the possibility of design in any caseremember that according to evolution if its made from organic components and have a self replicating system we need to conclude a natural process because it has living traits.
We don't know that, either. We could only conclude design if we found evidence of intentional manufacture.but we know that even a self replicating robot is evidence for design.
Do penguins show evidence of intentional manufacture? To they have tool marks or mold lines? To they employ synthetic or refined materials not found in nature? Does it say "made in China" on the bottom of their feet?therefore a penguin for instance need design too.
If you get evolution so wrong, as you did in your "cat to a dog" example, how can you expect anyone to take you seriously? This is failure at below a middle school level of education.evolution at the level of family (say a cat to a dog) is indeed just an assumption. on the other hand we have evidence for design in nature. think about this argument: say that we will see a self replicating robot ( lets say even with dna) on a far planet. do we need to conclude design or a natural process in this case? remember that according to evolution if its made from organic components and have a self replicating system we need to conclude a natural process because it has living traits. but we know that even a self replicating robot is evidence for design. therefore a penguin for instance need design too.
evolution at the level of family (say a cat to a dog)
Could thisevolution at the level of family (say a cat to a dog) is indeed just an assumption. on the other hand we have evidence for design in nature. think about this argument: say that we will see a self replicating robot ( lets say even with dna) on a far planet. do we need to conclude design or a natural process in this case? remember that according to evolution if its made from organic components and have a self replicating system we need to conclude a natural process because it has living traits. but we know that even a self replicating robot is evidence for design. therefore a penguin for instance need design too.
i didnt said in a single generation so im not wrong here at all. i can tell you more than that: can you prove that according to evolution why it will be impossible to evolve a dog out of cat in a single step? remember that some scientists believe in a multiverese or maybe even in infinite universe. thus there is no limitation for any type of change from a probability perspective.Once again, not how evolution works. Your understanding of evolution continues to be completely wrong.
No, you're still wrong. A cat can't evolve into a dog. We've already explained it to you a number of times.i didnt said in a single generation so im not wrong here at all.
Unfortunately it is also likely true that a blind obsessive cannot evolve into a critical thinker. No matter how often it is explained I doubt he will ever understand.No, you're still wrong. A cat can't evolve into a dog. We've already explained it to you a number of times.
It does not matter. This still demonstrates a very serious gap in your understanding of evolution.note that i didnt said in a single generation.
i didnt said in a single generation so im not wrong here at all.
so a fish cant evolve into human too? but this what already happened according to evolution.Generations have nothing to do with it. Cats don't evolve into dogs. Dogs don't evolve into cats.
Any claim otherwise demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of evolution.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?