I do not have the energy or inclination to teach you about the Gap Theory. From your comments, I do not believe you are teachable on this subject ... but that's just my opinion.
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I do not have the energy or inclination to teach you about the Gap Theory. From your comments, I do not believe you are teachable on this subject ... but that's just my opinion.
juvenissun
... and God saw that it was good.
- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,452
- 805
- 73
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
If you do not deal with the problems (of the Gap theory), you are cheating yourself. This will certainly have consequence to your reward in the Heaven.
Upvote
0
Faith.Man wrote:
That's probably a good idea. While OEC, YEC, gap, day-age, and other kinds of creationists are common, Juvi is the only Time Warp creationist I know of. Juvi believes that time alteration explain Genesis, that we can't understand time, and that Noah existed back in the Cambrian with trilobites.
But hey, he still apparently feels comfortable questioning how your Gap approach can make sense. Go Figure.
Papias
That's probably a good idea. While OEC, YEC, gap, day-age, and other kinds of creationists are common, Juvi is the only Time Warp creationist I know of. Juvi believes that time alteration explain Genesis, that we can't understand time, and that Noah existed back in the Cambrian with trilobites.
But hey, he still apparently feels comfortable questioning how your Gap approach can make sense. Go Figure.
Papias
Upvote
0
callmeMurph
BGTF
Originally I didn't really think about it that much. I feel like I was guilty of doublethink and that I kind of half heartedly believed in evolution and a literal Genesis. Then I decided to look into it. I started off believing in a literal Genesis, feeling like evolution had no basis as far as I was concerned.
I then decided to try and understand what most other people believed. I decided to be intellectually honest and to read arguments from all different angles, YE, OE, TE, etc. Eventually I moved towards a OE/ID type view and then ended up as a TE. Why? Well it's quite simple, none of the arguments held by YE/OE/ID proponents help up under scrutiny.
Upvote
0
juvenissun
... and God saw that it was good.
- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,452
- 805
- 73
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
It is a reasonable model. You can not prove that it is wrong. The idea of 5th dimension is much more fascinating and my model. Are you sure you can deny the existence of the 5th dimension?
Upvote
0
juvenissun
... and God saw that it was good.
- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,452
- 805
- 73
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
You are not careful enough. I bet you.
If you do not work in science, you will never be careful enough.
Upvote
0
juvenissun
... and God saw that it was good.
- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,452
- 805
- 73
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
What do you know about the Gap theory? May be you can fill the gap for Faith.Man. I promise I won't argue with you on what you can say.
Upvote
0
juvenissun
... and God saw that it was good.
- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,452
- 805
- 73
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
Exactly. But you can never experience evolution in firsthand. That should make you think about it one more time.
Upvote
0
juvenissun
... and God saw that it was good.
- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,452
- 805
- 73
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
Science is a low-level understanding. We are talking about the understanding which is one level higher than science.
Upvote
0
juvenissun
... and God saw that it was good.
- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,452
- 805
- 73
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
- Mar 16, 2004
- 22,030
- 7,265
- 62
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Catch me up a little bit here Juve, are you talking about String Theory?
Upvote
0
TheManeki
Christian Humanist
All that hanging around the CREVO forum and you still haven't learned that science doesn't need to experience something firsthand in order to study it -- the evidence a phenomenon leaves behind can be sufficient.
I'm not sure what is more amusing in this post -- the pseudoscientific mumbo-jumbo, or the use of the royal "we."
Upvote
0
r035198x
Junior Member
What is obvious to me from Genesis 1 is that our understanding is not the same as God's understanding and his measurements are not necessarily the same as ours all the time.
In verse 5
And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
Then in verse 14, 3 'days' later
And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years ...
In verse 5
And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
Then in verse 14, 3 'days' later
And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years ...
Upvote
0
Similar threads
