• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What About The Doctrines That Were Changed In The Bible?

Status
Not open for further replies.

OrthodoxyUSA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 6, 2004
25,292
2,868
61
Tupelo, MS
Visit site
✟187,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The History Channel is a horrible example of true history.

I'm not sure what their agenda is.... but if they aren't showing something on WWII, I won't watch it....

Forgive me.....
 
Upvote 0

Dragons87

The regal Oriental kind; not evil princess-napper
Nov 13, 2005
3,532
175
London, UK
✟4,572.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
"Thou shalt not kill", presumably animals as well? And then God "contadicts Himself" by requiring masses and masses of animals killed for sacrifice?

Nah ah. Impossible. God intended animals to be killed for His and human consumption.
 
Upvote 0

GraceInHim

† Need a lifeguard? Mine walks on water †
Oct 25, 2005
18,636
924
MA
✟24,206.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
OrthodoxyUSA said:
The History Channel is a horrible example of true history.

I'm not sure what their agenda is.... but if they aren't showing something on WWII, I won't watch it....

Forgive me.....

I agree.. and it is sad that some people who do not know any better will believe the false words they teach..

I watch to observe the lies.. to see what others may see.. saddens what lies and untruths, especially about our Lord also..
 
Upvote 0

OrthodoxyUSA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 6, 2004
25,292
2,868
61
Tupelo, MS
Visit site
✟187,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
GraceInHim said:
I agree.. and it is sad that some people who do not know any better will believe the false words they teach..

I watch to observe the lies.. to see what others may see.. saddens what lies and untruths, especially about our Lord also..

All of the non-Apostolic ideas have a simular origin...

Whats a poor T.V. misinformed person supposed to do?

TURN OFF THE T.V................. and begin reading true history?

Forgive me....:liturgy:
 
Upvote 0

GraceInHim

† Need a lifeguard? Mine walks on water †
Oct 25, 2005
18,636
924
MA
✟24,206.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
OrthodoxyUSA said:
All of the non-Apostolic ideas have a simular origin...

Whats a poor T.V. misinformed person supposed to do?

TURN OFF THE T.V................. and begin reading true history?

Forgive me....:liturgy:

seems mysteries are better, they want more of... look at the Movie about the Divinci Book and also the pilgrameges to France.. and the movie will probably get an oscar compared to the Passion got nothing.. :doh:
 
Upvote 0

eladoni

And the Brain.
Dec 29, 2005
17,377
277
Indiana
✟41,448.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Lfoxx said:
It has recently been brought to my attention... well I pondered it but didnt do much research on the sub. My plan this year was for me to read the whole bible from start to finish but the other day my hubby and Iwere watching the history channel and it was on fogotten books of the bible. We looked into it and were amazed at what we found. There were so many doctrines that werent put in. We started off by reading the book of Thomas but then I came across an article that blew my mind.

http://reluctant-messenger.com/essene/gospel_intro.htm

It talks about how An Irish clergyman, Rev. G. J. Ouseley claims to have discovered the Original Gospel from which the present Four Gospels were derived, which, he says, was "preserved in one of the Buddhist monasteries in Tibet, where it was hidden by some of the Essene Community for safety from the hands of the corrupters.

It then goes on to say:
The Original Gospel, representing the teachings of Christ, the Lord of Love, taught harmlessness and compassion to all living beings, including both animals and humans. For reasons above stated, the Roman Churchmen at Nicea opposed these doctrines and eliminated them from the Gospels, which they radically changed so as to be acceptable to Constantine, who loved the red meats and flowing wine of his midnight feasts too much to accept a religion that prohibited these pleasures, which was a main reason why he so bitterly persecuted the early Christians who advocated these doctrines. For this reason the Church Fathers changed the Gospel in such a way that Love and Compassion were limited only to human beings but the animal expressions of life were excluded from receiving these benefits. But the savior of the Original Gospel, as Christ were represented to be, was a redeemer of the animal world, as he was of men, seeking to alleviate the sufferings of all living beings.

Im just cutting and pasting but it basically says that the commandment "Thou shall not kill" was also meant twords animals because they are helpless creatures and that God loves them too. It also has stories of how Jesus would come across people being abusive to thier animals and Jesus would tell them not to do so, and to treat their animals well. Apparently these stories were taken out because the king at that time liked to eat meat and didnt want to quit living his life the way he had done so. I myself am a real animal lover and was very moved by these stories and also couldn't believe that books were changed so drastically to change things the way the people at that time or rulers rather to thier living styles. It changed my outlook on alot becuase this is something that couldve easily been done. I know what some are already thinking. If Jesus was a vegetarian then what about the story where he had the fish and loaves of bread and fed thousands. Well apparently this story was changed and Jesus fed the people with 6 loaves of bread and 7 clusters of grapes instead.

http://reluctant-messenger.com/essene/gospel_3.htm#Lection290

If this is the case theres so much that we are unaware of. I mean how many people or christians for that matter carry, wear, or even have as an emblem on thier car the fish from that story as a symbol. Please go to the links and let me know what you think. I mean why would this be made up.

http://reluctant-messenger.com/essene/gospel_3.htm#Lection210

These stories of Jesus defending animals of course he would. Jesus was a wonderful, compassionate, and full of love. Animals couldnt be here just to be our food, or to be tortued for food.


The only problem we run into here, is that when we look at these "lost books" they never match up with scripture.

Scripture, as a whole, flows perfectly, no contradictions, and its message never changes.

All the gospels we have, along with the epistles, bear witness to the promises of the old testament being fullfilled, in no way do they contradict the prophets, or the law beforehand, but fullfill them.

these other so called "gospels" and "books" should not be used to determine doctrine, nor should they be viewed as God's word, because they run contrary to God's word. These books may be an exellent historical read (like the story of perpetua), but we should not view them as God's word, or develop any doctrine from them. That is like developing doctrine from our history book.

Always read these so called books in comparasen to scripture, because if when we compare it to scripture, it will either agree with it, or be broken, but scripture will never be broken.

Now, what does scripture say about itself?

John 3:11-14

11I tell you the truth, we speak of what we know, and we testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony. 12I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things? 13No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man.[d] 14Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, 15that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.[e]

John 8:12-31

12When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life." 13The Pharisees challenged him, "Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your testimony is not valid."
14Jesus answered, "Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going. 15You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one. 16But if I do judge, my decisions are right, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me. 17In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid. 18I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me."
19Then they asked him, "Where is your father?"
"You do not know me or my Father," Jesus replied. "If you knew me, you would know my Father also." 20He spoke these words while teaching in the temple area near the place where the offerings were put. Yet no one seized him, because his time had not yet come.
21Once more Jesus said to them, "I am going away, and you will look for me, and you will die in your sin. Where I go, you cannot come."
22This made the Jews ask, "Will he kill himself? Is that why he says, 'Where I go, you cannot come'?"
23But he continued, "You are from below; I am from above. You are of this world; I am not of this world. 24I told you that you would die in your sins; if you do not believe that I am the one I claim to be,[a] you will indeed die in your sins."
25"Who are you?" they asked.
"Just what I have been claiming all along," Jesus replied. 26"I have much to say in judgment of you. But he who sent me is reliable, and what I have heard from him I tell the world."
27They did not understand that he was telling them about his Father. 28So Jesus said, "When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then you will know that I am the one I claim to be and that I do nothing on my own but speak just what the Father has taught me. 29The one who sent me is with me; he has not left me alone, for I always do what pleases him." 30Even as he spoke, many put their faith in him.
The Children of Abraham

31To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, "If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. 32Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free."

2 Peter 1:12-21

12So I will always remind you of these things, even though you know them and are firmly established in the truth you now have. 13I think it is right to refresh your memory as long as I live in the tent of this body, 14because I know that I will soon put it aside, as our Lord Jesus Christ has made clear to me. 15And I will make every effort to see that after my departure you will always be able to remember these things. 16We did not follow cleverly invented stories when we told you about the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty. 17For he received honor and glory from God the Father when the voice came to him from the Majestic Glory, saying, "This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased."[a] 18We ourselves heard this voice that came from heaven when we were with him on the sacred mountain.
19And we have the word of the prophets made more certain, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. 20Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation. 21For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
 
Upvote 0

ps139

Ab omni malo, libera nos, Domine!
Sep 23, 2003
15,088
818
New Jersey
Visit site
✟45,407.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
GraceInHim said:
seems mysteries are better, they want more of... look at the Movie about the Divinci Book and also the pilgrameges to France.. and the movie will probably get an oscar compared to the Passion got nothing.. :doh:
Good prediction - I think you are right.

I predicted Brokeback Mountain would win best picture at the Golden Globes and I bet my friend $10 it will win best pic at the Oscars.

DaVinci Code will probably win loads of awards...

Hollywood hates Christian morals, and will promote anything to undermine them.
 
Upvote 0

ps139

Ab omni malo, libera nos, Domine!
Sep 23, 2003
15,088
818
New Jersey
Visit site
✟45,407.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Back to the "lost gospels" topic:

It is logically impossible for there to be "lost gospels."

If you view the Bible as the word of God, then you know that God wouldn't allow important books to be lost! Thy will be done.

If you view the Bible in a secular sense, that it is the compiled writings of Christianity, then anything that is not in the Bible, is not in the Bible! And with no divine origin, it is impossible to state that some lost gospel "should have been" in the Bible.

And back to the Christian POV... if a book "should have been" in the Bible... then it is either already in, or a "should not have been, and isn't."
 
Upvote 0

UncleRicky

Regular Member
Feb 21, 2006
198
16
Burlington
Visit site
✟22,925.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Lfoxx said:
It has recently been brought to my attention...

There were so many doctrines that werent put in. We started off by reading the book of Thomas but then I came across an article that blew my mind.

Dear Lfoxx,

I own a bridge in Brooklyn that I'd love to talk to you about...

No, seriously, I believe (As I am sure you do too) that God is able to protect His Word.

Next time you see a program like that, think of it as entertainment, not truth. And do yourself a favour... Don't go and see the Da vinci Code when It comes out.

Blessings to you,

Rick
 
Upvote 0

ps139

Ab omni malo, libera nos, Domine!
Sep 23, 2003
15,088
818
New Jersey
Visit site
✟45,407.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I disagree Uncle Ricky, about your last point. I think Christians should see the DaVinci Code, and read it too. Only those who are strong in their faith though. Because it is like a missle fired at the Church.

When this movie comes out, even more people will be talking about the claims it makes, since unfortunately, more people watch movies than read.

We as Christians need to be armed with a defense against those claims. If you are known as a Christian, people will come to you to ask about Christian things. Some people at work have come up to me asking about DaVinci Code, and I have been studying its claims and plan to read the book this weekend.

There are some great books and DVDs that debunk it. I recently saw one called "Breaking the DaVinci Code" by Grizzly Adams productions. It takes a good look at the claims, lays them out, discusses the consequences of the claims, and investigates. It's also good because it is not biased towards Catholics or Protestants, it's mixed.

Scripture says that we should be ready to give an account for our faith, and our hope. (1 Pet 3:14). The DaVinci Code takes Christianity to task, it essentially says that we cannot trust the Church or the Bible...and we need to be prepared to defend our faith. So many people can be mislead because of this, we should arm ourselves with the truth to see that this does not happen. It really is, IMO, a great chance for evangelization.
 
Upvote 0

UncleRicky

Regular Member
Feb 21, 2006
198
16
Burlington
Visit site
✟22,925.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
ps139 said:
I disagree Uncle Ricky, about your last point. I think Christians should see the DaVinci Code, and read it too. Only those who are strong in their faith though. Because it is like a missle fired at the Church.

When this movie comes out, even more people will be talking about the claims it makes, since unfortunately, more people watch movies than read.

We as Christians need to be armed with a defense against those claims. If you are known as a Christian, people will come to you to ask about Christian things. Some people at work have come up to me asking about DaVinci Code, and I have been studying its claims and plan to read the book this weekend.

There are some great books and DVDs that debunk it. I recently saw one called "Breaking the DaVinci Code" by Grizzly Adams productions. It takes a good look at the claims, lays them out, discusses the consequences of the claims, and investigates. It's also good because it is not biased towards Catholics or Protestants, it's mixed.

Scripture says that we should be ready to give an account for our faith, and our hope. (1 Pet 3:14). The DaVinci Code takes Christianity to task, it essentially says that we cannot trust the Church or the Bible...and we need to be prepared to defend our faith. So many people can be mislead because of this, we should arm ourselves with the truth to see that this does not happen. It really is, IMO, a great chance for evangelization.

Greetings PS139,
As sometimes happens, you have missed my twisted sense of humor. I was implying that Lfoxx is too believing of whacky theories, and should therefore avoid the Da Vinci Code.

Apart from that, I agree with you. We need to be able to refute the book and the movie for those who are gullible enough to give it credence. Hopefully, most folks will realize that it is fiction, and no such "Ardent defense of the Faith" will be necessary


Blessings,
Rick


http://unclerickysperigrinations.blogspot.com/
 
Upvote 0

Warrior Poet

A Legendary Outlaw
Jun 25, 2003
2,052
116
43
Sunny SoCal, In a city named after a fruit. Cake.
✟25,465.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
That is quite the link, more so quite the story.

I have read much of the "early christian writings" and found many of them to not teach or convey anything that contradicts scripture directly.

I dont think a doctrine of helping animals would be one to find structure inside the Church.

As a big advocate of early christian writings, I find it did me a great disservice to NOT read them and read what the Church said about them, and their views on all of them(the writtings). The real thing is there is no new doctrine, or older doctrine, we can create or glean from these writings.

Warrior Poet
 
Upvote 0
I have a Darwin fish on my car.


I'm sorry...

Luke tells us in Acts11:7-9 God gave Peter a vision that all animals were now clean to eat.


That is not what that passge is about. It is refering to the Talmud of the Jews of not associating with the "uncircumcised"

Jesus warned that there would be many false prophets coming after His death and resurrection.


(cough)Ah... ah... ahh.. Jehovah's witnesses (cough)

And back to the Christian POV... if a book "should have been" in the Bible... then it is either already in, or a "should not have been, and isn't."

That's what I've always believed. Does anybody else agree with this method of verifying things? I find it very conclusive, but if I was talking with, let's say an atheist, I would have to tell them that literature that is not in the bible is not biblical because it is not in the bible. But then you can imagine what he would say to me. I've been looking for any other way to word it, or another method completly. Any ideas...?

Also... Genesis 9:3
Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you

In Christ, OObi

 
Upvote 0

IgnatiusOfAntioch

Contributor
May 3, 2005
5,859
469
Visit site
✟31,267.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Lfoxx said:
It has recently been brought to my attention... well I pondered it but didnt do much research on the sub. My plan this year was for me to read the whole bible from start to finish but the other day my hubby and Iwere watching the history channel and it was on fogotten books of the bible. We looked into it and were amazed at what we found. There were so many doctrines that werent put in. We started off by reading the book of Thomas but then I came across an article that blew my mind.

http://reluctant-messenger.com/essene/gospel_intro.htm

It talks about how An Irish clergyman, Rev. G. J. Ouseley claims to have discovered the Original Gospel from which the present Four Gospels were derived, which, he says, was "preserved in one of the Buddhist monasteries in Tibet, . . . .

C'mon, you really believe all this? No credible source backs it up.
 
Upvote 0

ps139

Ab omni malo, libera nos, Domine!
Sep 23, 2003
15,088
818
New Jersey
Visit site
✟45,407.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
OObi said:
That's what I've always believed. Does anybody else agree with this method of verifying things? I find it very conclusive, but if I was talking with, let's say an atheist, I would have to tell them that literature that is not in the bible is not biblical because it is not in the bible. But then you can imagine what he would say to me. I've been looking for any other way to word it, or another method completly. Any ideas...?
When talking with an atheist you will need to begin from a secular point of view. You can make an analogy that what happened if someone was poking around Thomas Jefferson's house and found "lost amendments" that should have been in the Bill of Rights. Should they have been in there? It's not a question ofthat... they're not in there. The people who put together the US constitution made the decisions. (Ok the only difference here is that the Constitution can be added to whereas the Bible cant, but that's besides the point)
With the Bible, from a secular POV, it was solely the bishops of the early church who decided which books were in, and which were out. It is a settled matter,.
 
Upvote 0

Nazaroo

Joseph is still alive! (Gen 45.26)
Dec 5, 2005
2,626
68
clinging to Jesus sandalstrap
✟18,230.00
Faith
Christian
ps139 said:
...With the Bible, from a secular POV, it was solely the bishops of the early church who decided which books were in, and which were out. It is a settled matter,.

I read somewhere that Jerome discussed this with a group of people (at least when putting together the Vulgate), and successfully argued for the exclusion of Enoch on the basis that there would not be room for the Apocalypse.

Where can I find the primary sources for these events (I presume Jerome documented this himself), and is there an English translation of this (I presume also it will be in Latin)?
 
Upvote 0

imind

Senior Veteran
Jan 20, 2005
3,687
666
51
✟37,562.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Rdr Iakovos said:
The fact that there were competing views no more disproves the veracity of the claims of historical, orthodox, creedal, Trinitarian, biblical Christianity than an absence of alternatives would prove same.
it was by no means meant to prove or disprove anything. but after considering the events leading up to the establishment of the canon, which undeniably began with constantine (according to the history i have read :blush: )

It is true that very few people today know very much of anything about the history of the Church. Couple that with the prevailing mistrust of tradition and authority, and the net result is people willing to believe anything they read, see, or hear- except, of course, that which has been passed down through unbroken generations of faithful witnesses.
that is the whole point, though. that tradition was (again, according to what i have read) aided considerably by the office of the emperor, to an extent that other beliefs were 'forbidden'.

Which leads me to the second part of your statement "any serious study will show." You are probably aware of the logical fallacy that you are employing here. Let us suffice to say that many who have given serious attention to studying holy scripture disagree with you. Many disagree with my conclusions also.
you are correct in this assessment, and i retract the statement.

Constantine is a bit of an Urban Myth amongst certain Protestant traditions and skeptics. If you wish to debate what he did and did not do, where he influenced the Church and did not, I would gladly enjoin that debate- on another thread.
this may be a good idea, as i would love to hear this version of history. i am not speaking sarcastically, as i understand that several versions of every era of our recorded history have been written.

So the alleged conspiracy of the "Roman Churchmen" at Nicea has no legs to stand on. Perhaps the conspiracy began with Justin, continued through Irenaeus, and found full blossom in Nicea?
its not so much a conspiracy as it is a simple order of events. the arguements discussed at nicea greatly influenced the canon, as the cannon would have to reflect that creed, and not the other way around. one could argue that the creed is the basis for the bible, and those writings that even suggested ideas that in any way contradicted that creed were dismissed.

We keep bumping into this conspiracy theory, which would have us see the Church fathers and mothers as retro-editors, engaged in wanton skullduggery and wholesale fraud,
not necessarily, but only to admit that its influences may have been political.

creating and espousing lies that they willing suffered and died for .
people have been willing to die for many things troughout history. what better way to emulate christ, after all.

As absurd as this underlying premise is, worse, it is completely unfounded and unproved.
unproven? we can't prove one way or the other. but it is not unfounded.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.