I'd say at least around the same age, with someone where the power differential is not too great, which would limit it in most cases to an age difference of 3 to 5 years. This is a gray area.You stated 15 is a ok age for sex, now does that limit sex to 15 year olds or can they have sex with adults?
No, I argue because your statements are a mockery of real victims. Pedophilia is an attraction of adults to children who have not yet reached physical maturity, who have no secondary sex characteristics. If you are using a term, at least start with an idea of its meaning.My statement was fact ,not abuse of a term. You simply argue for the sake of argument.
By keeping the laws we have now, although they are too strict in a number of cases in my opinion. I don't think a 19-year old should be convicted for having sex with his/her 17-year old girl/boyfriend. I especially don't think these adolescents should be placed on sex-offender lists, which is what happens at this point in time in some states in the US and is quite frankly barbaric.If you condone children having sex how would you keep them from sex with a adult?
I do not think this issue is simple and there is plenty of room for discussion here, but figuring out hard questions is not done by pretending a simple answer exists when there isn't one.
In the same way we try to keep women being victims of rape.How would you keep them from being victims.
You really need to understand what terms mean before you use them. To set you straight on this, adolescents being sexually attracted to their own peers is not pedophilia in any way, shape or form.It is a oxymoron statement to condone child sex and condem the use of the word pedophile if you are a adult. The rise of pedophilia would be due to ingornant people condoning children having sex.
Oh, well done, comparing consensual sex between adolescents with rape. Well done.Its easy when the rape is encouraged by a consenting attitude from parents.
Last edited:
Upvote
0