Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It matters who the audience it was written to.
Do you take instructions from the book of Malachi or Leviticus for example?
I don't think you know who Jesus was from the foundation of the earth.
So do you think you can deny the creator and get away with it?
2 Timothy 3:16
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
It was the pre-incarnate Jesus who created the heavens and the earth. See the first 14 verses of John's gospel.You're wrong.
Where did I say anything about denying the Creator - and even if I were to do that, why would I want to "get away with it"?
What I said was that Peter denied Jesus - a fact recorded in the Gospels - and was forgiven and restored by Jesus, John 21.
Yes, there is one God, who is Triune - Father, Son and Holy Spirit. 3 persons, one God.
Father, Son and Spirit are one but they are not the same. The Son is not the Father, the Spirit is not the Son.
Jesus himself said that whoever spoke against the Son would be forgiven, but whoever spoke against the Spirit would not be. This shows that the Spirit and the Son are individuals - otherwise his words wouldn't make sense.
And I'm not even sure what this has to do with Hebrews 6.
It was the pre-incarnate Jesus who created the heavens and the earth. See the first 14 verses of John's gospel.
That does not mean you take every word of God as written to you.
I know.
Neither, I'm sure, would most Christians.
But that wasn't my point. Jesus said in Matthew 12 that whoever says a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but whoever blasphemes the Spirit, won't.
If they had been the same, Jesus would have said, "anyone who speaks against me IS blaspheming the Spirit - and cannot be forgiven. But he didn't".
No, not really.
Peter had followed Jesus for 3 years. He had seen miracles, he had been sent out to drive out demons, he had seen the transfiguration and at least 2 people raised from the dead, he had walked on water. He had received a special revelation that Jesus was the Christ, the Son of God.
Jesus said that Peter was going to deny him. Peter said, "not me; even if I die, I won't deny you". Yet when he was asked, 3 times, "surely you were with Jesus?", he denied it, 3 x with curses.
It doesn't matter if it was his belief.
You said that whoever denies Jesus blasphemes the Spirit and cannot be forgiven- Peter denied Jesus, and was forgiven.
It also doesn`t mean you disregard the majority of the scriptures because they were written to the Jews.
So although Jesus forgave Peter, who was very special to him, do you think this gives us a licence to do what Peter did?
.
That is why Paul instructs us to rightly divide the word of truth (2 Timothy 2:15)
All part of the same teaching. Divide doesn`t mean to disregard.
For example, you don't take instructions in Genesis 17:14 as instructions to you correct?
You are dividing it without disregarding it.
Likewise, Hebrews 6:4-6 should be taken in the same manner.
Since the NT imagery has shifted to the circumcision of the heart I certainly would.For example, you don't take instructions in Genesis 17:14 as instructions to you correct?
You are dividing it without disregarding it.
Likewise, Hebrews 6:4-6 should be taken in the same manner.
Since the NT imagery has shifted to the circumcision of the heart I certainly would.
It was at one time but it’s moved past that. It is what it is.That is correct, you are rightly dividing the word, but you are certainly not disregarding that Genesis 17:14 was instructions to a different group at a different time, would you agree?
Divide and separate like a detective in a murder case examining and separating all the evidence.For example, you don't take instructions in Genesis 17:14 as instructions to you correct?
You are dividing it without disregarding it.
Likewise, Hebrews 6:4-6 should be taken in the same manner.
Divide and separate like a detective in a murder case examining and separating all the evidence.
.
It was at one time but it’s moved past that. It is what it is.
So if you think of Hebrews written to the Jews from the nation of Israel who will be facing the Tribulation and the temptation to take the mark of the beast, would the meaning of Hebrews 6:4-6 become clearer to you?
The other thing that’s moved on in typology is Israel as a nation transformed into individuals led by Christ thru the Holy Spirit.So if you think of Hebrews written to the Jews from the nation of Israel who will be facing the Tribulation and the temptation to take the mark of the beast, would the meaning of Hebrews 6:4-6 become clearer to you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?