• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Well-Being is the Meaning of Truth

coberst

Newbie
Nov 14, 2008
263
3
✟22,918.00
Faith
Agnostic
Well-Being is the Meaning of Truth

The satisfaction of our needs is the primary cause for our search for truth (knowledge). To satisfy our needs involves active interaction with nature and with society.

Satisfaction of needs is the means for well-being, which culminates in freedom, i.e. in self-determination. I claim that it is proper to say that freedom (self-determination) is the telos (ultimate goal) of all human activity.

The pursuit of knowledge (truth) takes place not within a vacuum but within an historic milieu and is shaped by practical concerns.

The natural sciences began in a modest form but are quickly accelerated by pressing social needs. Human activity shapes the truth that humans seek. As practical needs are met new theoretic needs are formed.

An example might be the manner and thrust of moral standards of behavior regarding our relationships with one another. Technology, as those who have read Marshall McLuhan’s “Understanding Media” understand, extends the reach of our senses and thus extends the reach of our interrelationships with others.

We are all born with a will to self-determination, a will to freedom. We all struggle to be independent; we all struggle with the internal and external forces that would constrict our urge to self-determination. This struggle for independence determines what type of person we become.

The adaptive type learn to ‘will’ that which is forcing the individual to follow orders. They manage to will themselves to follow authority as best they can. They become good soldiers. This is the passive individual who easily adapts to outside and inside forces; this is Joe and Jane average.

The neurotic type has a stronger will than does the adaptive type. Will is the word that Otto Rank uses instead of the ego that Freud uses. The will acts as kind of a gyroscope and gatekeeper for the individual. It is the will that tells us to stop, and take time out while we decide what to do rather than reflexively responding to whatever the environment demands. The neurotic type has a will that struggles against both external and internal forces. They worry and fret about being too willful; society also chastises them for this powerful will.

The productive type tends to be the creative individual. These individuals tend to become satisfied with them self, they can create an ideal that acts as their North Star. Such individuals create themselves in tune with their internal logic and turn to creating change in the world they encounter.

Otto Rank, a Freud protégé, wrote extensively about creativity. Creativity consisted of joining the material with the spiritual and the individual with the universal

If we compare these types with Maslow hierarchy of needs we can see the relationship.
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs:
1) Biological and Physiological (water, food, shelter, air, sex, etc.)
2) Safety (security, law and order, stability, etc.)
3) Belonging and love (family, affection, community, etc.)
4) Esteem (self-esteem, independence, prestige, achievement, etc.)
5) Self-Actualization (self-fulfillment, personal growth, realizing personal potential, etc.)

This hierarchy made us conscious of the obvious fact that we did not fret about the absence of self-esteem if we did not already have security nor did we worry about security if we did not have water to drink or air to breath.

I would conclude that Maslow’s levels of 1 thru 3 speak to the adaptive type while level 4 applies to the neurotic types with level 5, the level of self-actualization refers to the productive type.

The pinnacle of needs Maslow labeled S-A (Self-Actualization). In “The Farther Reaches of Human Nature” 1971, Maslow speaks of these needs and he apparently (as far as I know) introduced this new concept S-A as in “mid-stream rather than ready for formulation into a final version”.

 

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
-being, which culminates in freedom, i.e. in self-determination. I claim that it is proper to say that freedom (self-determination) is the telos (ultimate goal) of all human activity.
Perhaps I'm nitpicking, but I would say that self-determination is a necessary pre-condition and aspect of the telos, not the telos itself -- much as truth is a necessary means to satisfy our needs.

Our ultimate goal in life isn't to be free, but to use our freedom to actualize our telos, which is the daimon or ideal growing self. IOWs, our ultimate goal isn't merely to be free or independent, but to make creative use of our freedom, even though freedom is an aspect and pre-condition of such creative acts.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Upvote 0

coberst

Newbie
Nov 14, 2008
263
3
✟22,918.00
Faith
Agnostic
Perhaps I'm nitpicking, but I would say that self-determination is a necessary pre-condition and aspect of the telos, not the telos itself -- much as truth is a necessary means to satisfy our needs.

Our ultimate goal in life isn't to be free, but to use our freedom to actualize our telos, which is the daimon or ideal growing self. IOWs, our ultimate goal isn't merely to be free or independent, but to make creative use of our freedom, even though freedom is an aspect and pre-condition of such creative acts.


eudaimonia,

Mark

It seems to me that the need for freedom must come before the use of freedom.
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
It seems to me that the need for freedom must come before the use of freedom.

Just as the need for truth is for its use, not simply for its possession, so too is the need for freedom for its use, not simply for its possession.

The need for freedom "comes before" the use of freedom only in the sense that a means comes before its end.

I was discussing the proper understanding of the human telos. One's telos is one's primary target to aim for in life -- the ultimate end or goal of one's actions.

Everything comes before the telos, since the telos is what is to be accomplished in life. That means required for all progression towards the telos is reason as it is expressed in acts of self-determination. (Rational self-determination is not the only means required for the accomplishment of the human telos, but it is always a required means, and is often a means to other means.)

And so, the telos (the flourishing life) is the ultimate end, and rational self-directedness is the ultimate means.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Upvote 0