So at this post in the back and forth about Plantinga it seems to me that Tree of Life is to some extent making the very point I would in a refutation of Plantinga. The claim Plantinga makes seems to be that evolution has no need to select for true beliefs and so we should doubt our current notion of truth which includes naturalism. This is obviously a simplified versionThis is not quite true. Ostensious definition is the act of pointing at something in reality. Many times when someone asks: "what do you mean by 'red ball'"? All we can do it point to a red ball. Here words are directly attached to their referents and no further words are needed.
Thoughts?
Upvote
0