Carbon 14 isn't used to date the Earth. It only can date up to 50,000 years. There are numerous other forms of radiometric dating that are used to date the Earth. Meteorites that have hit the Earth are what are dated to 4.5 billion years old. You might have a point about 1 method of dating the Earth being error prone, if that's all that was used. But there is countless evidence attesting to the old age of the Earth. To claim that every field of science is wrong is absurd.
And you have a bigger problem to deal with when it comes to the age of the universe. We can observe stars 13 billion light years away.
Are you then saying all the methods are correct, and can't be wrong? remember not to long ago, the World was flat, and you were mocked if you said differently, And Lo, they had their evidence that it was flat. Here is what i see, people judge things that they see, as to how old it is. We estimate how old something is, by what we see with our eyes. Is it not written:
Jn:7:24: Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.
Yet Scientists are nortorious for doing just that, They can ONLY judge according to what they see, They base age of things, according to what they have seen, what is presented to them TODAY.
Here then is a righteous Judgement, i believe God made the EArth in 6 days, because that is what He said He did, and this i believe. They said the Grand Canyon took millions of years for the Colorado River to carve out the canyons. We now are forced to reexamine that theory, because Canyons like our Grand Canyon have been formed in a matter of Days, when it flooded. So then Scientist based how long the Grand Canyon took, based solely on what they see TODAY, and how much is being eroded away by the Colorado TODAY, They are not thinking about the Great Flood that happened 4000 years ago, and all that water poured off the United States, mostly using that canal, which we call today the Grand Canyon, which was actually made in a matter of a week. So then what actually took a week, by LOOKING at the physical evidence, we determine it took millions of years for the Colorado to carve out that huge canyon, Therefore they base their belief solely on what they see TODAY.
An Astroid hits the Earth 5000 years ago, we see that impact crator, and say it happened 20 millions years ago, How have they determined that age, this is what i am saying is wrong, Yes All methods that they use to determine the age of the impact crator is in fact wrong, and this is Glorious in my eyes, because God has hidden these things from them, because they refuse to merely believe the Truth in FAith, without needing the proof. Therefore in God's Great Wisdom, He has hid these things from them who desire Proof.
Mk:8:12: And he sighed deeply in his spirit, and saith, Why doth this generation seek after a sign? verily I say unto you, There shall no sign be given unto this generation.
Why do Scientist seek after evidence which is contrary to Scriptures. Because of this, their eyes are hidden from the Truth, because they lack Faith.
Which is better, a person who merely believes the Earth was created in 6 days, because that is what the Words of God teach, and they need no proof of it, but believe. Or a person who, because of what all the humans say about the EArth, do not believe what the Words of God say, but come up with reason to excuse their actions of not believing it, ie, it is a poem, it is alogorical, it is just a story and not the Truth, or whatever else they come up with so that they feel justified by not believing what the Words of God teach. These have altogether believed the humans over what the Words of God teach. Which of them therefore is approved of God, Those who merely believe by Faith, or those who doubt because of the physical evidence that they think is evidence?
IN His Holy and Precious Name, Jesus Christ
DiscipleDave
^i^