eksesar said:
It was a very serious step to add this expression, "the Creators promise," since it meant that the Watchtower Society (the magazines publisher) was now prophesying in the Creators namein Gods name. The Creator warns in the Bible against doing this without receiving a command from Him to do so:
I agree. They shouldn't have made it sound like that. I believe they weren't suggesting that 'the creator promissed what this will happen when we say it will.' because that doesn't make sense... however, God DID promiss that the end would come along with all that stuff in Revelations.... I believe that's the promiss they referred to, and they were saying 1914 could be the start of it.
But I agree, I'm offended by any church who claims God speaks through them, i.e. why I could never be a catholic.
When speaking about events leading up to the end of this wicked world, Jesus Christ warned that "many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many." (Matthew 24:11, KJV) Did he suggest that believers should follow such false prophets, loyally sticking to them through one prophetic failure after another, in the hope that they would eventually get it right? Far from it! Rather, Jesus warned, "Take heed that no man deceive you." (Matthew 24:4 KJV)
True... but how can you be sure they were really wrong? They said 1914 would be the start of the end of the world, and sure enough in 1914 the World War started. In WWI we crippled germany, bringing Hitler into rule, we used Russia to help defeat Hitler (crippling them in the process), bringing upon communism/the cold war. We used Iraq among many other middle eastern countries to defeat russia (crippling them in the process). Now we're using Great Britain to help defeat iraq. If this pattern holds and we fight GB, some serious stuff is going to happen, because the US and GB are the only two crazy enough to go all out, and likely use nukes.
It was a very serious step to add this expression, "the Creators promise," since it meant that the Watchtower Society (the magazines publisher) was now prophesying in the Creators namein Gods name. The Creator warns in the Bible against doing this without receiving a command from Him to do so: Read DEU 18:18-22
How old are they now, I mean Generations 1914 ?
That was, IMO, wrong of them to say. Again, they took something in the bible and assumed their understanding of it was a direct mandate from God. Their presumptuousness is a major reason I am a 'christian' and not a 'JW'
...then again... if you were born in 1914, you'd be 91... and there are still quite a few people older than 91 around... and with Bush acting like such a cowboy (no offence, not trying to be political, but everyone should agree, he enjoys using as much force as possible), along with all the crazy weather (flooding, hurricanes, the huge earthquake overseas) it wouldn't surprise me if it all came to an end soon... (however, I'm certainly not going to make the assumption, as the WTBS tends to do.)
Overall, my main conflict is people pinning all the presumptuousness of the WTBS on the JW's themselves... this would be like pointing that the pope claims that God speaks directly to him and assuming that all catholics think the same... or pointing at all the corruption in the catholic church, most notibly the insane number of child molestation charges, and assuming all catholics to be child molesters. The idiocy of the governing body of a religion doesn't make the understanding of the member's of the church's beliefs wrong.