Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And you have no reason not to believe it.
Which bit of science is faith based? You sound like you are implying science is a religion?-No. i am saying that is how The Bible works on faith and that is also how science works on faith. It is just that people of science will not admit they work on faith. But instead claim it is evidence.
Which bit of science is faith based? You sound like you are implying science is a religion?
Origin of life? You mean abiogenesis? What does that have to do with Darwin?-Origin of life science, you are on here defending one of their prophets and his beliefs (claims).
-My creation belief is in align with The Bible.
Origin of life? You mean abiogenesis? What does that have to do with Darwin?
Which doesn't line up with the history of God's creation.
Understanding that the Creation story in the Bible is the story of an ancient middle-eastern tribe and how they understood things isn't calling God a liar. But it sure isn't what God's own Creation is showing us.-Maybe you have never read where God created male and female. No where in The Bible is it stated God created life by a process of evolution. If a person claims God created by the process of evolution. They are calling God a liar and the account in The Bible a lie.
Nope. Cannot see how pointing out that Darwin wasn't a fraud applies to that verse from the Bible. Try again.
In other words, Darwin could have robbed a bank, burned down his school, and married his -- er -- skip that one, and still ended up highly venerated.
Understanding that the Creation story in the Bible is the story of an ancient middle-eastern tribe ...
So you admit that him discovering the theory of evolution was a good thing then? An act of charity as it were?
Evolution was being discussed long before Darwin came along.
He used to listed to his father and grandfather argue about it.
In fact, evolution was a hot topic all over, but no one could describe it accurately.
What Darwin did, was invent the breakthrough technology -- called natural selection -- that got evolution moving forward again.
I'll repeat my question:
So you admit that him discovering the theory of evolution was a good thing then? An act of charity as it were?
Darwin didn't discover the theory of evolution.
Then why are you in a science sub fora? You only believe what science tells us when it suits you?
-In areas of creation, i believe nothing that science states.
In areas of inventing objects that can be shown to work and be useful, i have no problem.
Science just should have stayed in their place God has given them to operate. But instead in a similar way satan did, they ventured into areas they should not have gone.
So now many scientist who now try to explain life, if they venture outside of what The Bible states, has to resort to fabrications. But since that area is basically atheist occupied, they cannot see the fraud they are believing in.
And I've seen absolutely no evidence of the Biblical creation story. In the same breath, I've seen a LOT of evidence of the creation story that science has opened up for us.-Sure i do as i nave never seen any evidence presented by science, that is simply just a claim. It is just that in the science world it is called and accepted as evidence. But the science world does not count as being the decider or establisher of truth.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?