Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Charles Darwin is often cited as being sinister.
And Darwin didn't understand the first ,the fixed or the broken to expound on any.
All Darwin was doing was explaining the biological world around him. That's all.
But he did it in spite of the Bible, not with respect to It.
I think his work reveals a soul in conflict and rebellion, proving who his daddy is. It's in the fruits . It is a work of rebellion and lies. There is only one father of such works. Sinister m8ght be a fruit worth observing.Charles Darwin is often cited as being sinister.
I think his work reveals a soul in conflict and rebellion, proving who his daddy is. It's in the fruits . It is a work of rebellio. And lies. There is only one father of such works.
Exactly how do you expect scientists to do their work? Let's take an example of a lab researcher studying the genetic and biochemical basis of bacterial resistance to an antibiotic. In what ways do you think they should incorporate the Bible into their work?But he did it in spite of the Bible, not with respect to It.
The Lord Tells us to be fruit judges and what the fruit of " a believers " does and what it looks like. So that we can follow in those foot steps, so that we do not follow fools and the rebellious and get more broken than we started off. Darwins rebellion and ignorance of creation has destroyed many souls , and that is heart breaking.He was cracking a joke that in Latin, sinister means left and is used to describe someone who's left handed.
No-one can judge a dead person's intent except for God.
The Lord Tells us to be fruit judges and what the fruit of " a believers " does and what it looks like. So that we can follow in those foot steps, so that we do not follow fools and the rebellious and get more broken than we started off.
How does one explain the biological world with respect to the Bible?
So when Charles Darwin's explanation of natural selection helps us understand how pathogens evolve ways around our efforts to control them so that we can save and improve lives, we should judge that to be a good thing, right?The Lord Tells us to be fruit judges and what the fruit of " a believers " does and what it looks like. So that we can follow in those foot steps, so that we do not follow fools and the rebellious and get more broken than we started off.
God did it.
Exactly how do you expect scientists to do their work? Let's take an example of a lab researcher studying the genetic and biochemical basis of bacterial resistance to an antibiotic. In what ways do you think they should incorporate the Bible into their work?
It's the Earth, as Created by God, and what it has to show us about the evolution of life on the Earth.I get this but what has this to do with Darwinism being from God ?
But in some cases researchers use their understanding of evolutionary relationships to help them figure out which genetic sequences to look at, or what certain sequences do.Good question and good example.
In the case of bacterial resistance, we know how microevolution does its thing.
The Bible neither needs to be invoked, nor contradicted.
The Lord Tells us to be fruit judges and what the fruit of " a believers " does and what it looks like. So that we can follow in those foot steps, so that we do not follow fools and the rebellious and get more broken than we started off. Darwins rebellion and ignorance of creation has destroyed many souls , and that is heart breaking.
Yet life evolves. God's own Creation, as Created by God is showing us that's how God Creates new life forms.A true believer.. Yet God did know and does know . Still no one asks Him. Because if they knew , it would destroy the magic of evolution.
IN MY OPINION, Darwin's book, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, and another book 66 years later, My Struggle, are by the same author.
So when Charles Darwin's explanation of natural selection helps us understand how pathogens evolve ways around our efforts to control them so that we can save and improve lives, we should judge that to be a good thing, right?
And evidence shows that He did it through evolution.
See how easy that was?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?