Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Was Adam the FIRST Food Producer??? GENERATIONS ???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DogmaHunter" data-source="post: 72099957" data-attributes="member: 346237"><p>1. adam and eve are mythical humans that never existed. Human population never consisted of just 2 individuals. </p><p></p><p>2. farming developed multiple times around the world in various human populations and did not radiate out of the middle east, like you like to claim.</p><p></p><p>3. when science talks about common ancestry in context of evolution, it talks about ancestral species, not individuals.</p><p></p><p>4. prime example of how you misrepresent science to forcefit it into your a priori faith based beliefs while also ignoring the bits that you can't forcefit into it. You are not following the evidence. Instead, you are trying to lead the evidence to the place where you want it to go.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DogmaHunter, post: 72099957, member: 346237"] 1. adam and eve are mythical humans that never existed. Human population never consisted of just 2 individuals. 2. farming developed multiple times around the world in various human populations and did not radiate out of the middle east, like you like to claim. 3. when science talks about common ancestry in context of evolution, it talks about ancestral species, not individuals. 4. prime example of how you misrepresent science to forcefit it into your a priori faith based beliefs while also ignoring the bits that you can't forcefit into it. You are not following the evidence. Instead, you are trying to lead the evidence to the place where you want it to go. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Was Adam the FIRST Food Producer??? GENERATIONS ???
Top
Bottom