- Nov 15, 2006
- 48,711
- 17,414
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
It's really an interesting study of the words; fight, wrestle, war, warfare, battle, struggle.
Who is our enemy and how are we instructed to fight. Are we instructed to fight - is the fight one of direct battle, or is it a fight of containment?
I think the main issue that I saw was the difference between doctrine and experience. Donald Gee wrote an excellent book on the subject. Is our Doctrine based off Scripture or our experiences?
I'll start with what I believe are some common errors. Most errors are formed because of a lack of contextual exegesis. That is a fancy way of saying that people take verses out of context to make them seem to say something else (most times to fit their beliefs). An example being "Binding demons"
Those adherents use
An adherent to contextual exegesis reads the verses before and following to define what the verse is speaking of. (meaning).
The verses are part of a specific conversation Jesus is having with His disciples. The subject of the conversation is forgiveness. That is the subject BEFORE the verse and continues AFTERS the verse. VS 18 is about forgiveness, makes no mention of demons, the devil, or waging spiritual warfare. Therefore it cannot be used for warfare.
Who is our enemy and how are we instructed to fight. Are we instructed to fight - is the fight one of direct battle, or is it a fight of containment?
I think the main issue that I saw was the difference between doctrine and experience. Donald Gee wrote an excellent book on the subject. Is our Doctrine based off Scripture or our experiences?
I'll start with what I believe are some common errors. Most errors are formed because of a lack of contextual exegesis. That is a fancy way of saying that people take verses out of context to make them seem to say something else (most times to fit their beliefs). An example being "Binding demons"
Those adherents use
Matt 18:18 “Assuredly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.
From this verse a case is then build (in their teachings), to support binding demons.An adherent to contextual exegesis reads the verses before and following to define what the verse is speaking of. (meaning).
Matt 18: 15 “Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. 16 But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that ‘by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ 17 And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.
18 “Assuredly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.
19 “Again I say to you that if two of you agree on earth concerning anything that they ask, it will be done for them by My Father in heaven. 20 For where two or three are gathered together in My name, I am there in the midst of them.”
21 Then Peter came to Him and said, “Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? Up to seven times?”
The verses are part of a specific conversation Jesus is having with His disciples. The subject of the conversation is forgiveness. That is the subject BEFORE the verse and continues AFTERS the verse. VS 18 is about forgiveness, makes no mention of demons, the devil, or waging spiritual warfare. Therefore it cannot be used for warfare.