• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

want proof of creation

Status
Not open for further replies.

rmwilliamsll

avid reader
Mar 19, 2004
6,006
334
✟7,946.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
www.creationevidence.org has tons of scientific ifo on creation and evolution.

its simple i think spesies to not evolve cross species.

humans are not evolved from another species in my belief but I believe animals evolve we know they can mutate is this evolution?


we have already established that "dog kind" is at the scientific taxonomy level of family.


ring species disprove no evolution across species boundaries as well.

evolution is the change in the relative percentage of the various alleles in a population over the generations. one of it's mechanisms is random mutation followed by selective pressure from the environment.


the phrase "it's simple" is obviously not applicable to the whole field of evolutionary biology or we would simply not be here discussing the issues.

afaic see there is no scientific evidence at:
http://www.creationevidence.org/

the main page is at:
http://www.creationevidence.org/cemframes.html

refers to:
In overview, we see that the radiocarbon dating method is certainly no embarrassment to the Biblical creationist who believes in a young earth. In fact, when all data, such as the decay of the magnetic field and the canopy, is taken into accord, carbon dating seems to support a young earth.
on: http://www.creationevidence.org/scientific_evid/carbon/se_carbon.html

however to their accuracy they did get:
Carbon-14 is produced in the upper atmosphere by action of cosmic rays. Once the C 14 has been formed, by converting nitrogen-14 into carbon-14,
when the majority of YECists sites do not.

however:
The problem with the carbon dating method is—scientists can not be sure of what the C14/C12 ratio was when the organism died. Carbon dating assumes that the ratio has remained constant; however, events, such as the industrial revolution, are known to have raised C12 levels.
is false, calibration and correlation with tree rings has fixed this issue. no mention of it in this short page.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dannager
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.