Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 15,198
- 7,478
- 31
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Maybe we don't know what we are up against, but we do know what we are against.
Maybe we don't know what we are up against, but we do know what we are against.
Yeah, I imagine the reason they aren't being cleaned is because of politics and money, not science.
Yeah, I don't think so.
But those honest folks didn't mention money.
Not generally, no. What's really odd is that most creationists fully accept the process of biological evolution (whether they know it or not), they just deny the logical consequences of that process.
I'm against the theory of "goo to you". The rest of it isn't that important.
I'm more concerned with the logical consequences of the theory than with the process.
But you're laying your troubles at the feet of science and getting angry at them for not doing anything when it's not them who has to fix them.
... You're against the theory of 'goo to you'... but the rest of it isn't important. You've basically contradicted yourself!
But they won't allow anyone else to fix those problems as long as they have power over them.
It isn't important to me.
And those logical consequences are...?
How is science not allowing anyone else to fix it? How?!
More study, less action. And if action does occur it is often misguided.
Take any big social problems that is 'under study' by social science experts. Note that they are not being solved, just harvested.
But you keep sticking your nose in to discussions involving evolution and act like it is important to you.
Why is it bad to be as accurate as possible about a problem before wanting to fix it?
And how can you be certain that this is purely the fault of science and not the fault of your local government?
I do fault local government, for listening to the scientists.
I'd ask you to clarify this, but I'm not since these whole things just run the same course with you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?