Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Video: Pennsylvania election hearing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tom 1" data-source="post: 75546958" data-attributes="member: 404020"><p>Take each of those individual allegations and put them in their own context. There were more than enough observers already observing, arguing that they should have been allowed to stuff ever more people in is not any sort of argument. The hooha over usb cards is nothing more than a basic misunderstanding over procedure, at best. I’ve watched enough of each segment to see it’s nothing more than has been presented anywhere else - a lot of rambling nonsense no-one even bothers to put any intelligent questions to. If you want to believe at least try and investigate the claims independently- what possible reason could you have to believe stuff just because someone says so? Take one instance of fraud and explain exactly how it happened, using all available sources show clearly and specifically what happened, and why you think it happened that way. Why is it difficult to understand that accusations and uninformed notions are not evidence? It may be that actually trying to demonstrate evidence for actual fraud will help you to understand what the difference is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tom 1, post: 75546958, member: 404020"] Take each of those individual allegations and put them in their own context. There were more than enough observers already observing, arguing that they should have been allowed to stuff ever more people in is not any sort of argument. The hooha over usb cards is nothing more than a basic misunderstanding over procedure, at best. I’ve watched enough of each segment to see it’s nothing more than has been presented anywhere else - a lot of rambling nonsense no-one even bothers to put any intelligent questions to. If you want to believe at least try and investigate the claims independently- what possible reason could you have to believe stuff just because someone says so? Take one instance of fraud and explain exactly how it happened, using all available sources show clearly and specifically what happened, and why you think it happened that way. Why is it difficult to understand that accusations and uninformed notions are not evidence? It may be that actually trying to demonstrate evidence for actual fraud will help you to understand what the difference is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Video: Pennsylvania election hearing
Top
Bottom