Very Cool Debate Notes

[laptoppop]

http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/4978

There's a bunch of supporting links throughout the notes.

There's also a link to the annotated debate at the bottom of the page.

 

[vossler]

Thanks, it was quite interesting. At first I thought this was quite short for an hour and a half but then I noticed it was only the debate notes. One thing I always find fascinating is how evolution never seems to fair well in debates. You'd think for a theory that is always portrayed as such a slam dunk they'd be kicking creationists in the shins all the time, instead it's the over way around.

 

[busterdog]

Thanks, it was quite interesting. At first I thought this was quite short for an hour and a half but then I noticed it was only the debate notes. One thing I always find fascinating is how evolution never seems to fair well in debates. You'd think for a theory that is always portrayed as such a slam dunk they'd be kicking creationists in the shins all the time, instead it's the over way around.

I can never tell who is winning. It has always seemed to me that being right is over-rated in any event. Witness the crucifixion.

 

[vossler]

I can never tell who is winning. It has always seemed to me that being right is over-rated in any event. Witness the crucifixion.

Well in this one it is hard to tell, but I've seen countless debates over the years and have rarely found the evolutionist to be very good. There was one exception though and that's this guy named Dan Barker who, get this, was a pastor for 17 years before becoming an atheist. Sadly, he's very good at presenting his case. Thankfully the guy I watched go against him was quite good too.

I definitely can agree with you statement that being right is over-rated. It's the primary reason I don't argue much anymore, I find little to no value in being right.