Hmm...Well, I don't trust the Vatican for squat, but I don't trust the news either, so....The Vatican seems to be pushing an agenda other than a religious one, but I'm the first to admit that I'm not intimately familiar with the working and philosophy of the Roman Catholic church. Generally, all I see is the abuse stories (not unique to the catholic church, a baptist member in my city was recently sentenced to jail for rape of several women in his congregation), the complaints of catholics (complaints such as the antiquities of the anti-contraceptive rules, confessionals, etc.) and so on. Plus, I've never understood why confessing to a priest was necessary. Jesus died for our sins and He serves as a...for lack of a better word, middle man...between us and God, right? So why do I need the priest. I don't, repeat DO NOT, want to start a debate those are just things I don't understand as a non-catholic. But, anyway, if the vatican is deciding what is and is not a sin, then I'll take a pass, because the Big Guy upstairs gave me a big ol' book of what He wanted me to know. However, if they're just modernizing it to make it more relevant to life rather than a seemingly antiquated list of rules, good for them.
read the articles above, the Vatican isn't passing new laws on sins. One official just offered his opinion on modern issues in relation to sin in terms of discussion, not law. In this case you're wise to not trust the media
They definitley got this one wrong (but what else is new?)

Upvote
0