Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
But Markie is not arguing.Non-Catholics arguing about Catholic councils is going from amusing to annoying.
I understand your point. And I wouldn't want to split hairs over nothing.And following the council, the novus ordo Mass, sometimes referred to the new Mass or the Pauline Mass, opened the door to an innumerable Novelties and liturgical abuses.
I understand your point. And I wouldn't want to split hairs over nothing.
But the fact is that liturgical abuses happened under the old form of the Mass as well. I've spoken to old timers who recount attending 15 minute, bare-bone Masses even on Sundays because the priests had skipped everything they were permitted to skip, and probably also a few things they were not permitted to skip.
I don't see the problem here as an issue of one form of the Mass being problematic while the other is perfect. Rather, the attitude of the priests offering the Mass appears to be the common denominator with all these abuses and whatnot.
Again, it isn't a matter of there being a problem with one form of the Mass or the other. For whatever it's worth, my preference is for the TLM. I was welcomed into the Church by a priest from FSSP and attended the TLM as often as possible because I prefer that form.My humble and ineffable thanks to our good Holy Father, Pope John Paul II, the Good Shepherd who went out looking for all those abandoned sheep to lead us back home again — to Rome, sweet home.
Would I go back to the new Mass? No way!
Rev. Charles Schoenbaechler, C.R.
Louisville, Kentucky "
But Markie is not arguing.
He simply sees what appears to be an about-face.
It is true that the council of Trent and the 'spirit' of Vatican II are different things. I'm not seeing how the council of Trent and the actual words of Vatican II are in such discord. But that comes down to the hermeneutic one uses. There is a hermeneutic of discontinuity, employed by 'liberals' and also by fringe rad-trads which says that the old and the new are incompatible. One approves the new and rejects the old, while the other bemoans the loss of the old and rejects the new. The bulk of us have a hermeneutic of continuity, where the old and the new are seen as parts of a continuous whole.Thanks - I won't elaborate on that, but you are correct, it goes on from there. Trent and Vatican II contradict each other enough that both can not be true.
Thank you for this! That's what I see, yes. I entered the Church just recently, and once inside it was not what I read about. Almost the only active group was the Charismatics, and what they were doing was not "orthodox". I talked to one priest, and he pretty much said he steers clear of it, but the bishop allows it - Lord only knows why.
You can tell who the "orthodox" Catholics are and who are not, and it seems everyone gets to do what they want these days. And I'm a newbie.
I have been looking at Orthodoxy now, as all the off the wall stuff in the Catholic Church has me wondering. But I really don't want to leave!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?