• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Solomon Kane

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2005
858
29
63
Columbus, OH. USA
✟35,276.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Politics
US-Constitution
Vampires are an excellent metaphor to use with whatever issue an author deals with.
However, I have to agree with LH about their over use in modern writing. I'm getting very tired of the angsty, over blown perpetual teenager style that the movie Lost Boys started. Also, the " I lost and am searching for my one true love", that alot of the recent books seem to harp on.
I want my vampires to be sociopathic predators. Beings that understand that humans are a lower link on the food chain. After all, how many here worry about the last feeling your last hamberger had.
I want my undead to be the scheming creatures that have plans that require decades to complete. They have the time.
Also, I prefer the old style gothic vampire. If it can't turn into a bat, wolf, or mist, it's just a poser.
 
Upvote 0

Humbledmac

Active Member
Aug 16, 2005
104
1
39
✟229.00
Faith
Baptist
I like my vampires to be social creatures. Someone you'd meet on the street and think, "Oh they look nice." but when you turn around they about to bite your neck!

To me, vampires are a perfect example of those type of people who enjoy "sucking" the life out of people, whether it be cash, cars, or even boy/girl friend. they'd do anything to get what they need, and enjoy their victims suffer.:mad:
 
Upvote 0

dawnsday

Senior Veteran
Nov 19, 2004
2,398
151
STL, MO
✟33,344.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Solomon Kane said:
Vampires are an excellent metaphor to use with whatever issue an author deals with.
However, I have to agree with LH about their over use in modern writing. I'm getting very tired of the angsty, over blown perpetual teenager style that the movie Lost Boys started. Also, the " I lost and am searching for my one true love", that alot of the recent books seem to harp on.
I want my vampires to be sociopathic predators. Beings that understand that humans are a lower link on the food chain. After all, how many here worry about the last feeling your last hamberger had.
I want my undead to be the scheming creatures that have plans that require decades to complete. They have the time.
Also, I prefer the old style gothic vampire. If it can't turn into a bat, wolf, or mist, it's just a poser.

you should check out the Laurell K. Hamilton series about Anita Blake the slayer....you get a mix of all different looks at vampires, a modern plotline, good stories, and she's a christian...throughout the series she falls away, but i'm sure she'll find god again...it's a really good series.
 
Upvote 0

Solomon Kane

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2005
858
29
63
Columbus, OH. USA
✟35,276.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Politics
US-Constitution
dawnsday said:
you should check out the Laurell K. Hamilton series about Anita Blake the slayer....you get a mix of all different looks at vampires, a modern plotline, good stories, and she's a christian...throughout the series she falls away, but i'm sure she'll find god again...it's a really good series.
I read the first three Anita Blake books back when you still had to hunt through the sci-fi/fantasy section of the bookstore to find them. While interesting, I thought the character concept was limited and a that is an opinion I still hold now that Ms. Hamilton has achived some fame.

What I would like to see is someone write another series along the lines of Robert Weinberg's Masquerade of the Red Death trilogy. That series had the type of vampires that interest me. Creatures so old that they remember when the stars themselves were in different locations. Amoral to the point of being indifferent to the deaths of thousands if it helped them to achive their goals.
 
Upvote 0

KarateCowboy

Classical liberal
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2004
13,390
2,109
✟140,932.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Humbledmac said:
I finished a short story about a girl in college who hooks up with the wrong crowd......and their vampires!!!

vampires are an excellent character to use in writing. something about a monster that was human once, is so appealing to readers? Do you agree?
Do you know what is even more appealing? Good grammar! I love good grammar because it is really great and wonderful. It makes me happy.
 
Upvote 0

Silver Saint

Silver Saint
Feb 5, 2004
105
5
40
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟260.00
Faith
Christian
I do not mean to break in unannounced with contradiction, but I had to make my thoughts known.

The vampires we all grew up with, while entertaining, are not scripturally sound creatures at all; they cannot exist. This fact alone is the biggest turn off for me any time they're involved with horror: any fear they create is irrational, and doesn't survive logical scrutiny. Same with the noble, ageless, angst that people romanticize them with nowadays. No one, not even God himself, can alter the nature of a thing (God by his choosing, not inability).
As far as our fascination with the vampire, I believe that we fear something that is more human then ourselves. A vampire most certainly is, if you take 'human' to mean sinful nature. A creature who has everything that you have, plus a strength and ruthlessness to affect you whether you like it or not. That being said, that a vampire should be overwhelmingly human brings me to my next point.

A man cannot ever be anything other than a man, because to do so would be to end the original creation. A man can choose what to be, but he can never 'be' as a demon is. By this I mean the transformations and the like. Now, a demon in human form is one thing, and I don't doubt that happens from time to time. Why not? But the idea that anyone can be turned into a creature like the ones discussed here is pointless writing. It has been my experience that we are to be creators of 'what if's, not 'if only's. Writing about things that God would never allow to exist is a form of disobedience, for why imagine something that is contrary to the nature of all that is good? It can only be evil. I say this tentatively, of course, because then there's the whole 'How do you know God's will?' or 'Who are you to discern creation?' arguments, but I don't think we want to get into that today.
I say all this in the hope that you might take what you can from them. I do not mean to sound cold, or damning, though I often come across that way. I speak as if I believe what I am talking about, because... Well, what other way is there?

I do, however, have a work in progress that takes everything I've said here to heart. I've gotten a lot of good responses in the college I'm attending, and hope to have the book published by the end of next year. I'd be glad to let you judge for yourselves, but I'd rather have my name in print before I give anyone in the general public access to the ideas that are to be my livelihood. You understand, of course. But as you've no doubt noticed, I'd love to debate the core of the issue to resolution if you so wish.
Go with God.



I am Aware,
Christopher
 
Upvote 0

KarateCowboy

Classical liberal
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2004
13,390
2,109
✟140,932.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
BUt dudddde! Vampires are teh l337! Tehre was this 1 vamp muvee I thoutht of m4k1ng w1th m7 friends about this gurl in hgih school whose dating a vpmyre, and she IS a vamprye(half). aANd she's halve human, and p4rt un1c0Rn! Rc0k on lol omgosh holy ppoop!

All joking aside, I see what you mean. But, where do draw the line between reasonable fiction and fantasy indulgence? Tolkien was a Christian as was C.S. Lewis, yet I have read articles by Christians calling their books Satanic (particularly Tolkien's). Crazy huh?
 
Upvote 0

Humbledmac

Active Member
Aug 16, 2005
104
1
39
✟229.00
Faith
Baptist
Silver Saint said:
I do not mean to break in unannounced with contradiction, but I had to make my thoughts known.

The vampires we all grew up with, while entertaining, are not scripturally sound creatures at all; they cannot exist. This fact alone is the biggest turn off for me any time they're involved with horror: any fear they create is irrational, and doesn't survive logical scrutiny. Same with the noble, ageless, angst that people romanticize them with nowadays. No one, not even God himself, can alter the nature of a thing (God by his choosing, not inability).
As far as our fascination with the vampire, I believe that we fear something that is more human then ourselves. A vampire most certainly is, if you take 'human' to mean sinful nature. A creature who has everything that you have, plus a strength and ruthlessness to affect you whether you like it or not. That being said, that a vampire should be overwhelmingly human brings me to my next point.




A man cannot ever be anything other than a man, because to do so would be to end the original creation. A man can choose what to be, but he can never 'be' as a demon is. By this I mean the transformations and the like. Now, a demon in human form is one thing, and I don't doubt that happens from time to time. Why not? But the idea that anyone can be turned into a creature like the ones discussed here is pointless writing. It has been my experience that we are to be creators of 'what if's, not 'if only's. Writing about things that God would never allow to exist is a form of disobedience, for why imagine something that is contrary to the nature of all that is good? It can only be evil. I say this tentatively, of course, because then there's the whole 'How do you know God's will?' or 'Who are you to discern creation?' arguments, but I don't think we want to get into that today.
I say all this in the hope that you might take what you can from them. I do not mean to sound cold, or damning, though I often come across that way. I speak as if I believe what I am talking about, because... Well, what other way is there?

I do, however, have a work in progress that takes everything I've said here to heart. I've gotten a lot of good responses in the college I'm attending, and hope to have the book published by the end of next year. I'd be glad to let you judge for yourselves, but I'd rather have my name in print before I give anyone in the general public access to the ideas that are to be my livelihood. You understand, of course. But as you've no doubt noticed, I'd love to debate the core of the issue to resolution if you so wish.
Go with God.



I am Aware,
Christopher



but dude my point is that in a sense vampires are represent some dark parts in humanity, past a present. did you know the first vampire Dracula was inspired by a ruthless king who would stick his enemies up on poles in the middle of the city just to scare other people. it was also based off of a queen who would bathe in young girls blood to stay young:cool:
 
Upvote 0

RobinLayne

Senior Member
Sep 7, 2005
1,193
31
65
Oregon
Visit site
✟24,220.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Hi. I'm new to the site, and this is my post. A friend told me about this thread because I'm writing a book with a vampire in it and the book has a Christian message. You've all brought up some interesting things to think about and since I have so much I'd like to say, I'll divide the issues into seperate posts. I am encouraged to find some Christians who are interested in what vampires can symbolize. Some just say, "How can you write about vampires if you're a Christian?"
and they don't even know what it is I am writing. I certainly wouldn't say everything you want to communicate can be represented by vampires. That's silly. But a lot. Let me go back and reply to eaach post I read one at a time.
 
Upvote 0

RobinLayne

Senior Member
Sep 7, 2005
1,193
31
65
Oregon
Visit site
✟24,220.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Solomon Kane said:
Vampires are an excellent metaphor to use with whatever issue an author deals with.
However, I have to agree with LH about their over use in modern writing. I'm getting very tired of the angsty, over blown perpetual teenager style that the movie Lost Boys started. Also, the " I lost and am searching for my one true love", that alot of the recent books seem to harp on.
I want my vampires to be sociopathic predators. Beings that understand that humans are a lower link on the food chain. After all, how many here worry about the last feeling your last hamberger had.
I want my undead to be the scheming creatures that have plans that require decades to complete. They have the time.
Also, I prefer the old style gothic vampire. If it can't turn into a bat, wolf, or mist, it's just a poser.

A metaphor for whatever issue? Isn't that overstating it? There's plenty of symbolism to be had, certainly, but they can't represent everything.

Yes, they are overused. If you are going to write about vamps, I think you need an original twist. So much is written, it's hard to know what really is original. Since vampires don't really exist (I think I can say that pretty confidently, except that there are people who drink blood and call themselves vampires--why is that, we should ask?), writers are free to use what ideas they like in defining them for their own fiction, as long as the reader can accept them.
A dream I had inspired my present novel, and my own version of what vamps are like in my own writing evolved as the plot unfolded. First I got to know what the vamp in this story was like, and from there my rules began to formulate. As I decided I might extend it into a series, the ideas broadened. What about having more than one kind of vampire? People vary greatly. Why can't vampires? I researched the old legends and found some interesting variations that may not have all been tapped in modern writing. People really did used to believe in them, and some still do. A lot of things were reported that are open to interpretation. Some people believed there were "live vampires," which were akin to witches, learning from the dead ones and able to do astral projection into animals. This is a subtler version of transformation and might really be possible. Truly transforming into animals has become rather overused in itself in vamp fiction these days, I think. Associating bats with vampires is a relatively new concept, not happening until Europeans discovered certain bats in Latin America and named them after the legendary vampire. The wolf, however, is a very old association in some circles, which closely related the concept of werewolf with them in various ways.
What if some vamps are the sociopathic predators while others are not completely changed into that? There is more to work with when you can have variety and gradation, more you can say about being human.

I can't assume I know what you mean by gothic. Do you mean they all have to come from that era or think like that era? Do you mean they have to dress in black and all those other trimmings? That doesn't seem to be necessary or even likely to me. It is such a stereotype and doesn't reflect the variety that I think they would really possess as individuals if they were real.

I follow my original vision, changing it where necessary, and it has led me down many unexpected roads. I let my vamps develop according to what seems natural to my heart and what I want to say.
 
Upvote 0

RobinLayne

Senior Member
Sep 7, 2005
1,193
31
65
Oregon
Visit site
✟24,220.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
About the slayer idea: I'm rather disturbed by what its does to our attitudes to think it's good to go around killing things that at least appear to be human. Doesn't this at least subconsciously lead us toward prejudice and murder? I recently read Dracula, and it is a pretty Christian book, although it doesn't say anything about being born again. The concept it communicates is that killing a vampire is setting him free from damnation. That is based on the tradition that vampires are corpses and belong dead. The whole staking tradition (not the only way to kill a vamp, by the way) came from trying to keep bodies in their graves before there were coffins. The more alive our vampires are, the worse it seems to kill them. If we think of some people as human and some as not, we head in the direction of Nazi Germany. Instead of evolution as an excuse to view some human beings as less human than others, we perceive some as monsters instead.
It's okay to hate monsters, isn't it? Is it a good idea to hate anyone? Maybe it's not constructive to hate even Satan himself. God lets him continue to exist for His own purposes, after all.
This is one of the issues my characters struggle with. Is it really true that the only vampire is a dead vampire? Are they really all dead? Are at least some human? Is there another way to deal with the problem?
 
Upvote 0

RobinLayne

Senior Member
Sep 7, 2005
1,193
31
65
Oregon
Visit site
✟24,220.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Silver Saint said:
I do not mean to break in unannounced with contradiction, but I had to make my thoughts known.

The vampires we all grew up with, while entertaining, are not scripturally sound creatures at all; they cannot exist. This fact alone is the biggest turn off for me any time they're involved with horror: any fear they create is irrational, and doesn't survive logical scrutiny. Same with the noble, ageless, angst that people romanticize them with nowadays.

No one, not even God himself, can alter the nature of a thing (God by his choosing, not inability).

As far as our fascination with the vampire, I believe that we fear something that is more human then ourselves. A vampire most certainly is, if you take 'human' to mean sinful nature. A creature who has everything that you have, plus a strength and ruthlessness to affect you whether you like it or not. That being said, that a vampire should be overwhelmingly human brings me to my next point.

A man cannot ever be anything other than a man, because to do so would be to end the original creation. A man can choose what to be, but he can never 'be' as a demon is. By this I mean the transformations and the like. Now, a demon in human form is one thing, and I don't doubt that happens from time to time. Why not? But the idea that anyone can be turned into a creature like the ones discussed here is pointless writing. It has been my experience that we are to be creators of 'what if's, not 'if only's. Writing about things that God would never allow to exist is a form of disobedience, for why imagine something that is contrary to the nature of all that is good? It can only be evil. I say this tentatively, of course, because then there's the whole 'How do you know God's will?' or 'Who are you to discern creation?' arguments, but I don't think we want to get into that today.
I say all this in the hope that you might take what you can from them. I do not mean to sound cold, or damning, though I often come across that way. I speak as if I believe what I am talking about, because... Well, what other way is there?

I do, however, have a work in progress that takes everything I've said here to heart. I've gotten a lot of good responses in the college I'm attending, and hope to have the book published by the end of next year. I'd be glad to let you judge for yourselves, but I'd rather have my name in print before I give anyone in the general public access to the ideas that are to be my livelihood. You understand, of course. But as you've no doubt noticed, I'd love to debate the core of the issue to resolution if you so wish.
Go with God.



I am Aware,
Christopher


When you wrote:
No one, not even God himself, can alter the nature of a thing

I immediately thought of the new birth. If being born again is not having your nature altered, I don't know what is.
The vampire is a Satanic counterfeit of that miracle. God has given us an innate desire for immortality. If we are not seeking God or don't believe He can give us eternal life, we try other ways to fulfill our God-given desires, even if it is only in the fantasies of our minds. I hope my book will reach that audience and turn them to the true immortality of Christ.
It is also an evil counterfeit of the Resurrection. I was on a website on Easter and somebody referred to "zombie Jesus."

If we must not write about things that cannot be, what does that "cannot" encompass? Some people have condemned me for writing fantasy simply because it is not real life. Well, no fiction is. All fiction is fantasy, in that sense. Jesus told stories about sheep and goats that talked. Joseph shared dreams about sheeves of wheat bowing in obesience to another sheef of wheat and heavenly bodies doing even more impossible things. Surely fantasy has its uses! But I do agree that we need to pray, search the scriptures, and check our consciences about our writing, preferably before we write it. I've learned that the hard way!


RE:
a strength and ruthlessness to affect you whether you like it or not.

It does bother me to imagine a creature who can make you evil against your will. I believe we have free choice, and I think that needs to be taken into account in fiction. What if an element of choice is involved in becoming a vampire? That would better represent the reality of humanity and evil. But at the same time, we really don't have free choice in the sense that we are all born with the sin nature. We are, in a way, all vampires. It is our nature to take more than we can give. We have a deep need that we try to get from others, but really only God can fulfill it. If you look at it that way, the vampire can be humanity under a microscope.


Regarding
A man can choose what to be, but he can never 'be' as a demon is.

Thinking of vampires as reanimated corpses, people have sometimes thought of them as containing the original soul. Why it would be dead still if its soul had returned doesn't make sense to me. Others have believed that it is a demon who inhabits the body. We know they can do so with live humans. I hate to think they can do so with dead ones, but can we know it's impossible? If they do, they are not the human that inhabited the body at all but may deceive people to believe they are--just like they do in the form of "ghosts." It's possible the vampires that people reported seeing, etc., were demons making such appearances.


You wrote:
By this I mean the transformations and the like. Now, a demon in human form is one thing, and I don't doubt that happens from time to time. Why not? But the idea that anyone can be turned into a creature like the ones discussed here is pointless writing.

My response:
We know that a live human being can be possessed by a demon and that he can act like a demon. This is certainly one of Satan's aims. Whether transformation into animals is possible I prefer to doubt, but some people in the occult claim it happens. How can we know for sure what demons can drag people into if they commit themselves to the demons? Especially if they are willing and wanting to do these things. I don't know. I haven't done a lot of research into the subject. Being wise as a serpent and innocent as a dove is a tall order when it comes to learning about the occult, because it can open me up to powers that give me problems.


The following is confusing to me:

It has been my experience that we are to be creators of 'what if's, not 'if only's. Writing about things that God would never allow to exist is a form of disobedience, for why imagine something that is contrary to the nature of all that is good? It can only be evil.

My response:
Is not Satan contrary to the nature of all that is good? And yet he does exist. If we are forbidden to write about him, we can't write much that matters in this world, and we have to throw the Bible itself away, because it tells about Satan.
I'm afraid your argument gets muddy at this point. It feels to me more like the old "You can't write fantasy because it's not real, so it's evil" regardless of any specific criteria to judge the subject matter. We definitely should judge our subject matter. I gave up two fantasy serieses because I could not in good conscience write of the good guys performing magic, which is strictly forbidden in the Bible. I prayed a long time for inspiration for fiction that would uphold and not go against God's principles. I feel God gave me the dream for the vampire story and the opportunity to communicate a Christian message through it. Of course you have a right to your opinion on it, and you also don't know the details of what my vampires are and are like. But your insights are still valuable to me, and if you have more to say about this, I would like to hear it.

As for your current writing project, best blessings on it. I understand your not wanting to divulge the plot before publication. I worry that I've said too much about my own stuff. But if I don't divulge some of the information to some people, I feel I won't get the help I need with it and know what I need to know about marketing it.

You are a very good thinker for a 19-year-old, by the way! Keep it up. But do let the Spirit lead and balance your heart with your head. Without love, we are nothing. Thanks. :hug:
 
Upvote 0

RobinLayne

Senior Member
Sep 7, 2005
1,193
31
65
Oregon
Visit site
✟24,220.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Jacque said:
BUt dudddde! Vampires are teh l337! Tehre was this 1 vamp muvee I thoutht of m4k1ng w1th m7 friends about this gurl in hgih school whose dating a vpmyre, and she IS a vamprye(half). aANd she's halve human, and p4rt un1c0Rn! Rc0k on lol omgosh holy ppoop!

All joking aside, I see what you mean. But, where do draw the line between reasonable fiction and fantasy indulgence? Tolkien was a Christian as was C.S. Lewis, yet I have read articles by Christians calling their books Satanic (particularly Tolkien's). Crazy huh?

I am a fan of Tolkien and particularly of Lewis since childhood. But I increasingly came to the realization that although Lewis did much good with his writings and Tolkien communicated a wonderful sense of good and evil, they both are largely responsible for a very unhealthy trend in fiction, movies, games, and life itself. The reason is that they compromised on the subject of magic. Their writings were so well-done and their spirituality so deep that they couldn't help making a big impression. There is no denying that fairytales pack a punch with useful symbolism and that for people who don't understand or accept miracles, magic in fiction can teach concepts. But its practice is strictly forbidden in the Bible. This does not imply that we can't have villains in our story that practice magic. The Bible has its sorcerers and witches. It doesn't even mean that a "good guy" can out of ignorance or rebellion try magic. But hopefully our stories should not teach that magic is good! Things like Aslan using the "deeper magic from before the realm of time" and setting up a magician to rule the Dufflepuds, and Tolkien's Gandalf being a good servant of Illuvatar (wizard simply means a male witch, and we know what the Bible says about witches) have had a disastrous affect on many. All kinds of writers wanted to get on the epic fantasy bandwagon, communicating all kinds of beliefs and misbeliefs. Now we have dungeons and dragons, kids roleplaying demons, kids wanting to be wizards or vampires or thinking they are, etc., etc. The magic is just too appealing.
You can blame Disney for a lot of it, too, but Disney was an athiest. A Christian, especially a scholarly one like Lewis or Tolkien, should know better. Lewis said Narnia was a fantastical place "where magic worked," making it clear that he believed in this world it doesn't. Did he really think that the reason God forbade witchcraft was that it didn't work, and that if you were in a world where magic worked it was right to disobey that law God made? Sorry, but I think when the guy got to Heaven, God said, "Lewsy, you got some 'spainin' to do!"

I've heard enough and experienced enough to say that magic does work. And it's not nice stuff.

What is magic? And why is it bad? Many people need to know the answer to this question. As part of my research for my writing, I read a book about witchcraft written by a witch. Of course she tried to sugar coat it, but I could see through some of that. She defined magic as making things happen by our wills.

I thought about Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane. This was the prelude to the Cross, the greatest miracle of all time. In Lewis' words, Aslan was testing the magic when he went to the Stone Table. But Jesus was not a magician. He stated what his will was. He begged that he not have to do what it was not his own will to do, but all three times he put God's will first. "Yet not my will be done, but Yours be done."
It was the direct opposite of magic. And look what it accomplished and is still accomplishing!

Thus it becomes clear why rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft. It is insisting on our own way instead of submitting to God.

Interestingly, the book I read said that to become a witch you had to dedicate your life to their god and goddess. Idolatry. You also were not to believe in the existence of a Devil but take full responsibility for your own actions. So I imagine that if somebody did a witch wrong, the witch would assume it was all the wrongdoer's fault. No tempter or deceiver exists to use them in this way. What a perfect reason to use magic to get justice or get back at people! She also wrote that whatever you do, good or bad, comes back to you threefold. Arithmatic different from God's, if you check your Bible. God blesses good a lot more than he curses evil, and what hope in this fallen world would we have otherwise? Witchcraft, I learned, is a religion that imprisons and leads astray.
Of course her branch of the occult is not as all-encompassing as she made it sound. I also read part of a book on voodoo, and it scared the bejeebers out of me that any thinking soul, much less the medical doctor who wrote it, would speak in favor of it. To be initiated into voodoo, he said you had to be possessed. His list of demons to choose from included, among others, Lucifer and Satan. Seperate beings? Like our arch enemy isn't bad enough as one, without being a split personality?
Well, enough of that. You get the idea. I learned a lot from Lewis, and I can never reach his clout in this world. But darn it, I have to slap his hand!

Not compromising my convictions in my writing may prevent me from being a successful author or even making a living. I feel like I accomplish so little in the kingdom of God. But at least I strive, like Jabesh, to cause no pain.

I had a dream recently that I was in a room with C.S. Lewis. He was sitting in a chair in the corner. I stood nearby, poring over John 3:16. He was not impressed. I said, "Maybe John 3:16 is just right for a kid like me."

Kind of reminds me of his poem, "Donkey's Delight." Read it if you get the chance.

Calling an author Satanic is pouring the baby out with the bathwater. It may be that only Satan is totally Satanic. Let's keep the good and avoid the bad. Let's learn from our favorite authors: both their successes and their failures.
 
Upvote 0