Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sounds interesting. But how does "nobody" administer websites? Or collect the funds needed to maintain them? Or set standards so all the parts can communicate?Nobody regulating the internet?
the One True Church?
How is it done now.Sounds interesting. But how does "nobody" administer a website or collect the funds needed to maintain it?
Only those who don't understand how it works believe this to be possible. It is like proposing we get rid of centralized control for airplanes and have each component self govern. It simply will not work.Nobody regulating the internet?
Ah the can thats still being kicked down the road 2000 years later.Done - we will figure out which one that is in another thread.
Sounds interesting. But how does "nobody" administer websites? Or collect the funds needed to maintain them? Or set standards so all the parts can communicate?
This is a good analogy, thank you. Like roads. We pay taxes to use them, yet there are regulations about how to operate and even who is allowed to use them. But what if we just left it up to special forces to decide who and what was allowed on the roads? This is my concern from the article in OP.Only those who don't understand how it works believe this to be possible. It is like proposing we get rid of centralized control for airplanes and have each component self govern. It simply will not work.
Whose designing the AI then?
I am a firm believer in, "you make time for what is important to you". Thus if discerning the truth is important to you, you will spend the time.
The alternative would be to just put blind trust in "experts"
Nobody regulating the internet?
From the articleThe United States Special Operations Command has no interest in regulating the internet. Do you understand their mission and objective for employing AI?
For a free speech example, look at this website we're on right now. Its highly regulated by private owners - individuals or a corporation, I dont know. If they took an unregulated approach this place would turn intolerable in no time at all. The owners know this.How is it done now.
Control ..... do you mean Bidens USSOCThe United States Special Operations Command has no interest in regulating the internet. Do you understand their mission and objective for employing AI?
Who owns the internet?For a free speech example, look at this website we're on right now. Its highly regulated by private owners - individuals or a corporation, I dont know. If they took an unregulated approach this place would turn intolerable in no time at all. The owners know this.
Yes, but since we're talking about free speech issues, who controls individual websites is actually more important than engineers setting protocols "under the hood", as it were, for basic operability.....But there is a difference between websites and the internet, right?
....
Control ..... do you mean Bidens USSOC
Alright, lets say I wanted to make a website about something highly controversial. Yet was unable, because the code "under the hood" prevented me from creating it in the first place?Yes, but since we're talking about free speech issues, who controls individual websites is actually more important than engineers setting protocols "under the hood" as it were for basic operability.
Maybe like how China and some other countries control their internet access?IOW, you don't know.
No one, strictly speaking.Who owns the internet?
Well then we'd have prior restraint censorship which would be illegal (and imo wrong) - with a few sensible exceptions like outright personal harassment, spilling military secrets, the very wrong kind of "porn", etc.Alright, lets say I wanted to make a website about something highly controversial. Yet was unable, because the code "under the hood" prevented me from creating it in the first place?
They are not making a determination of what is allowed. They are labeling things as disinformation that are not true. ( I believe. I've not really read the article)Not saying I have the answers for this, just a "third" option. But there is a difference between websites and the internet, right?
This is a good analogy, thank you. Like roads. We pay taxes to use them, yet there are regulations about how to operate and even who is allowed to use them. But what if we just left it up to special forces to decide who and what was allowed on the roads? This is my concern from the article in OP.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?