Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Unrealized Genomes as the Ultimate Falsification of the Theory of Evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sfs" data-source="post: 73716426" data-attributes="member: 8727"><p>I'm challenging your assumption that a single, unique sequence of DNA at 1615 positions would be required for a given phenotype. Your only justification for this assumption is . . . that it's what you're assuming. Your calculation then consists of nothing but determining that hitting upon a particular string of 1615 DNA bases by chance is unlikely, which is kind of obvious. What is your basis for assuming that only that string of DNA could generate your phenotype?</p><p></p><p>One of us knows a lot more about genetics than the other. Wanna guess which is which?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sfs, post: 73716426, member: 8727"] I'm challenging your assumption that a single, unique sequence of DNA at 1615 positions would be required for a given phenotype. Your only justification for this assumption is . . . that it's what you're assuming. Your calculation then consists of nothing but determining that hitting upon a particular string of 1615 DNA bases by chance is unlikely, which is kind of obvious. What is your basis for assuming that only that string of DNA could generate your phenotype? One of us knows a lot more about genetics than the other. Wanna guess which is which? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Unrealized Genomes as the Ultimate Falsification of the Theory of Evolution
Top
Bottom