These are the identies of the "regenerated" tribes. Matt.19;28 The charts you have examined are a discription of the identity of the Christians. They originated from Jesus's message. Why bring up the uninformed beliefs of those false chuches and groups? I don't at all agree with them nor they with me. They are racist and probably part of the antichrist.
There are certain beliefs that are associated pretty much automatically with the Christian Identity movement. I'm sorry for associating these with you, since you apparently don't hold them. I still disagree with your ideology (ie., the twelve apostles really didn't recreate twelve tribes of Israel, they created twelve lines of succession that exist in every corner of the Earth), but you really don't seem to hold the more extreme beliefs that I've seen in the past. Your site's name is "Christian Identity Revealed", and upon going to the site, I saw a map of Europe with "European Christian Israel" written on it. I'm sure that, with your description of how you reacted to the Christian Identity movement, you can understand why I was reluctant to read further.
With that out of the way, though, I can address this in a way that's a little bit more civil. Your view on Genesis merges the so-called "four elements" system that first emerged with Empedocles (a Sicilian philosopher from the fifth century) with the Bible, but at the very latest, Genesis was likely written roughly half a century before Empedocles was born. Similar but different systems existed in Babylon and would have been more likely as a source, but they had more than four elements, and those elements were not exactly the same as those of the Greeks (from henceforth the Hellenes, because I prefer the term and believe that it's more reflective of how the people described viewed themselves). This Hellenic system of philosophy was the most popular during the Middle Ages, but it was eventually revealed to be incorrect (ie., things are not made up of four elements, they're made up of a host of elementary particles like quarks, and those quarks make up over a hundred atoms with different reactive properties). It seems inappropriate, then, to attach the four elements system to Genesis.
EDIT: Sorry, I wrote this before your second post. It seems unlikely that Empedocles would have obtained his philosophy from Israel when it had various precursors in other parts of the world. The second part of this still stands, though. The four elements system was a valiant attempt to understand the way that the world works, but we now understand some of the elements (fire, for example) aren't fundamental building blocks of the Universe. Fire is a chemical reaction between oxygen and other molecules like carbon that generates enough heat to cause a chain reaction and to excite electrons, which rise to a higher shell on individual atoms and then descend to a lower one, releasing a photon of light. Water is a combination of oxygen and hydrogen, and air is a complex pastiche of atoms (same with earth).
