D
DerelictJunction
Guest
I'm not uncomfortable with the discussion. I just see it as going nowhere because your solution to the presentation of evidence is to say "No it's not!" and then proclaim scientific conclusions as "faith based guesses and suppositions".I don't feel that I misrepresent what you write, I challenge and disagree with what you write. You reference someone's opinion about the relative randomness of mutations, the only impetus whereby humanity was created from an alleged single life form of long long ago, and I point out the usual guesses and suppositions which commonly accompany such views. You attempt to use the term "evolution" as a monolithic term, and it isn't. Evolution must face the issue of how humanity was created from the alleged single life form of long long ago and must face the lack of evidence for the view that only random/chance mutations was the creative impetus.
Not so far, no.
There are no scientific conclusions, supported by evidence, that only random/chance mutations is the creator of humanity. There are plenty of pseudo-scientific guesses and suppositions though.
Why the faith-based atheistic Darwinist creationist viewpoint is allowed in schools while other faith-based creationist viewpoints is an ongoing question. And of course one which will continually be challenged.
Simply because you're uncomfortable with examining the implications of atheistic Darwinist creationism, and it's failure to offer evidence for the philosophical worldview, is no reason to shy away from the fact that it's no more than just another faith-based creationist viewpoint.
You don't bother with rebutting the evidence, yet you expect others to kowtow to your endless request for evidence that you will also dismiss with your "No, it's not!".
It would be nice to declare something false and that would make it so. However, that's not how reality works.
Your use of that tactic not an honest debate, and I am surprised that you engage in it. So, I will not continue discussing that subject with you. If you wish to discuss common descent, I will reply in that topic.
Upvote
0