Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
OK. Now explain the other billion smart phone users?Yeah, I could care less at this point about verification.
I had a flip phone, but I don't know how to post photos from it.
I surf on a kindle, I won't pay $30 a month for internet on a phone.
I live in a rural area, so I'm familiar with them.At a high enough altitude, the vapour simply becomes cirrus cloud.
Ever seen a crop duster work?
Explain what? Why their photos aren't considered as serious evidence?OK. Now explain the other billion smart phone users?
note how low they have to fly and the quantity they have to use to be effective.I live in a rural area, so I'm familiar with them.
By whom? How would you even gather a sample of an alleged "chemtrail"?Chemtrails have been analyzed.
why no unambiguous photo has been taken? Why unambiguous photos aren't being taken regularly?Explain what? Why their photos aren't considered as serious evidence?
Lots of respectable investigators have tracked and sampled them. It is easy to find on the internet.note how low they have to fly and the quantity they have to use to be effective. By whom? How would you even gather a sample of an alleged "chemtrail"?
Ambiguous is what the object of interest is, hence all photos of of an unidentified object, will be ambiguous, no?why no unambiguous photo has been taken? Why unambiguous photos aren't being taken regularly?
You made the claim, it's up to you to provide the citation, not me. Otherwise we're just playing "I have a dragon in my garage."Lots of respectable investigators have tracked and sampled them. It is easy to find on the internet.
The government has ruled that the term chemtrail is only used by conspiracy terrorists, and what they call them is "persistent vapor trails", so lurk, but don't touch. Let us know what you find out.
Don't play semantics. Unambiguous in the sense that the photo is credible and of an unexplainable object.Ambiguous is what the object of interest is, hence all photos of of an unidentified object, will be ambiguous, no?
Don't accuse me of exactly what you are doing.Don't play semantics. Unambiguous in the sense that the photo is credible and of an unexplainable object.
It probably was.It was a weather balloon
No, thanks. I'd much rather play "There's a dragon in my garage" than the game you're inviting.You made the claim, it's up to you to provide the citation, not me. Otherwise we're just playing "I have a dragon in my garage."
Then don't complain when I don't take your claims seriously.No, thanks. I'd much rather play "There's a dragon in my garage" than the game you're inviting.
I am not obligated to substantiate my claim to a lazy, cynical, heckler... but thanks anyway.
I'm not trying to annoy anyone. But what's the point of discussing stuff if it's not to exchange ideas?Don't accuse me of exactly what you are doing.
Photo credibility is a topic for another thread.
I am obviously not interested in establishing credibility.
You either believe this stuff or you don't. I care not which, except to say we shouldn't annoy each other.
Then let's get right to the point. What exactly is the idea you wish to exchange?I'm not trying to annoy anyone. But what's the point of discussing stuff if it's not to exchange ideas?
Well, if you have any actual evidence of UFOs, I'd love to see it. Unambiguous photos, for instance?Then let's get right to the point. What exactly is the idea you wish to exchange?
. Pay attention. It is you who has complained to me. You have addressed none of my complaints because you don't even believe they are real. And now you want me to believe you are not intentionally annoying.Then don't complain when I don't take your claims seriously.
I don't believe you believe any unambiguous photos exist, and I have repeatedly told you I give a flip if you believe me or not. Why don't you just respect that fact and stop embarrassing yourself by asking for proof?Well, if you have any actual evidence of UFOs, I'd love to see it. Unambiguous photos, for instance?
I don't believe they exist because I've never seen them. If they do exist, and you know of them, I'm asking you to correct me. Is that unreasonable?I don't believe you believe any unambiguous photos exist, and I have repeatedly told you I give a flip if you believe me or not. Why don't you just respect that fact and stop embarrassing yourself by asking for proof?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?