Two quick articles on human evolution:

[Shemjaza]

Without complete skeletons or fossils, all you have to go on are guesses and artist impressions of what they might have looked like. If you are going to accuse me of dishonesty that you have to remove the reasonable doubt that I have about these "ape-men" existence by substantive proof, and the only way you ca do that is to show photographs of complete skeletons or fossils.

What nonsense.

Skulls go beyond reasonable, into the indisputable.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Worthless without a valid source.

Try again.

 

[Subduction Zone]

While I am waiting for a valid source for that image, I myself have not found a source, valid or not yet. But I did find this:

Hmm, something is missing.

 

[Presbyterian Continuist]

Worthless without a valid source.

Try again.

worldnewsdailyreport.com
Prehistorical cave art drawing depicting humans hunting dinosaurs, discovered in Kuwait.

worldnewsdailyreport.com


Prehistoric Cave Art Depicting Humans Hunting Dinosaurs Discovered in Kuwait

worldnewsdailyreport.com

 

[Subduction Zone]

worldnewsdailyreport.com
Prehistorical cave art drawing depicting humans hunting dinosaurs, discovered in Kuwait.

worldnewsdailyreport.com


Prehistoric Cave Art Depicting Humans Hunting Dinosaurs Discovered in Kuwait

worldnewsdailyreport.com

LOL!! Bogus source. Seriously, check how reliable your sources are when the publish nonsense. I found the source. It is the same as the picture I found a couple of minutes ago:

history of animation : cave paintings

Your source not only has a picture that has obviously been altered. It also lists the wrong place making it harder to find the original.

 

[Shemjaza]

worldnewsdailyreport.com
Prehistorical cave art drawing depicting humans hunting dinosaurs, discovered in Kuwait.

worldnewsdailyreport.com


Prehistoric Cave Art Depicting Humans Hunting Dinosaurs Discovered in Kuwait

worldnewsdailyreport.com

I'm not sure you can rely on the fact checking of a site that publishes:
FLORIDA FISHERMAN LOST AT SEA FOR 14 DAYS CLAIMS HE WAS SEXUALLY ASSAULTED BY MERMAIDS

 

[Presbyterian Continuist]

LOL!! Bogus source. Seriously, check how reliable your sources are when the publish nonsense. I found the source. It is the same as the picture I found a couple of minutes ago:

history of animation : cave paintings

Your source not only has a picture that has obviously been altered. It also lists the wrong place making it harder to find the original.

Oh well. I have produced my evidence, which is more than you have been able to do for me. It won't matter what evidence I produce, you will find a way of refuting it because you are firmly on your foundation of belief and even if a whole truckload of photos are shown that gives reasonable doubt concerning evolution, you will choose not to believe it. So you might as well give up on me, because there is no way that will be ever convert me to your belief system.

 

[Presbyterian Continuist]

I'm not sure you can rely on the fact checking of a site that publishes:
FLORIDA FISHERMAN LOST AT SEA FOR 14 DAYS CLAIMS HE WAS SEXUALLY ASSAULTED BY MERMAIDS

Well, I just chose one photo of similar cave drawings from Google images, there are plenty more from more reliable sources, no doubt.

Actually, I'd be more likely to believe the story about the Florida fisherman than some fictional re-history ape-man who developed into a human being over time by chance.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Oh well. I have produced my evidence, which is more than you have been able to do for me. It won't matter what evidence I produce, you will find a way of refuting it because you are firmly on your foundation of belief and even if a whole truckload of photos are shown that gives reasonable doubt concerning evolution, you will choose not to believe it. So you might as well give up on me, because there is no way that will be ever convert me to your belief system.

And it failed. You found a source that had a badly altered picture that lied about where it came from. Wrong information is worse than no information at all.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Well, I just chose one photo of similar cave drawings from Google images, there are plenty more from more reliable sources, no doubt.

Actually, I'd be more likely to believe the story about the Florida fisherman than some fictional re-history ape-man who developed into a human being over time by chance.

No, there really are not.

By the way, evolution is not "by chance". That is another lie told to you by creationists.

 

[Presbyterian Continuist]

No, there really are not.

By the way, evolution is not "by chance". That is another lie told to you by creationists.

Oh well, when it comes down it, you have your opinion, and I have mine.

 

[Shemjaza]

Well, I just chose one photo of similar cave drawings from Google images, there are plenty more from more reliable sources, no doubt.

Actually, I'd be more likely to believe the story about the Florida fisherman than some fictional re-history ape-man who developed into a human being over time by chance.

Let me get this straight.

Paleontologists have found multiple skeletal remain, including complete skulls to clearly demonstrate the existence of animals who are not clear human or "ape"... but you think a google image search of fake cave paintings is considerably better evidence?

Foolishness.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Oh well, when it comes down it, you have your opinion, and I have mine.

No you just have opinion. I have facts and evidence, you have none.


Here is a serious question, do you think that God is a liar?

 

[Shemjaza]

Oh well, when it comes down it, you have your opinion, and I have mine.

What you don't have is evidence.

 

[Presbyterian Continuist]

What you don't have is evidence.

Neither do you, so that makes us equal.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Neither do you, so that makes us equal.

No, we have mountains of evidence. You do not understand the concept so by Rule Number One you are unable to demand or even ask for any.

Rule Number One is lifted if you learn what is and what is not evidence.

 

[Kylie]

While I am waiting for a valid source for that image, I myself have not found a source, valid or not yet. But I did find this:

Hmm, something is missing.

Obviously this picture has been faked to remove the indisputable proof that dinosaurs lived alongside the cavemen!

 

[Shemjaza]

Neither do you, so that makes us equal.

Skulls. I believe you used the adjective "plenty" of them.

I'm concerned about me breaking site rules, so I am no longer going to engage with you.

 

[Presbyterian Continuist]

Obviously this picture has been faked to remove the indisputable proof that dinosaurs lived alongside the cavemen!

Read your post carefully. You are saying that the picture shows proof that dinosaurs existed along with humans!

 

[Kylie]

Read your post carefully. You are saying that the picture shows proof that dinosaurs existed along with humans!

You seem to be unfamiliar with the concept of "sarcasm."