A while ago, in the "news" (I mean that in the loosest sense possible), a "family" with "13" children by the name "Turpin", has become national, and even international headlines. Yet, there is a problem (well to be more specific, several problems and inconcistencies), that we need to look at, and where it takes place at:
It is reported:
Also recall their "connection" to "Texas", a Bible beliving, gun carrying state, homeschooling state ...
It is reported:
Do you begin to see what this is all about? What 'they' are really after here?
Problems, inconsistencies.
1. The number 13. It is occult, and the media, 'those' socieities, etc all make use of such things [like the 32nd floor of Vegas, etc, etc.] to flag their events for themselves.
2. The photos. Why are they blocking out the adult 'children' [did I just say "adult children"???] who are over 18 years of age [one is even supposed to be 28]. There are numerous things going on in the photos. All the persons, even behind the 'masking' are smiling, and not in a forced way. The 'wife' looks pleasantly joyfilled. Posing, etc. Who is taking the photos at 'disneyland', a relative, a worker at the park, [where are their comments] etc?
3. Where are the 'adult' children interviews? I smell a book or other gimmicks in the coming, more 'funding' ...
4. Donation pages immediately went up.
5. Relative, is entirely suspicious, about letting someone watch them in the shower?
6. The underfed story doesn't add up either, look at the height and builds of the children in those photos. underfed don't gain such strength or height. Some are even as tall as or taller than their parents in those photos.
7. The chained up bit doesn't add up either, who were some of the ones who supposedly answered the door?
8. The escapee story makes little to no sense also, especially in regards the "deactivated" cell phone, and the "photos" she was carrying. Why not just run next door, bang on the door.
9. Ages in photos compared to current ages, etc.
etc., etc...
I am sure if people with more time, look into this, it will be seen for what it is. A theft of rights, a direct assault upon the constitution and the bill of rights, and amendments, therein. It was foretold:
So, is it Turpin-time to wash away a little more of those? To invade into the family home and to be able to direct the instruction of our children?
What was the 5th Commandment, Exodus 20:12 KJB? How can the children honour their father and mother, when the state interposes itself between them and the parents? It all goes back to Romanism. Read their humanist material, and their "human rights" list in their various encyclicals, bulls, etc., which the U.N. follows.
The Great Controversy, page 442 -
Testimionies to the Church, Volume 5, page 451:
It is reported:
"... David Allen Turpin, 57, and Louise Anna Turpin, 49, were said to have forced their children to memorise passages of the Bible during “very strict” home schooling sessions. ..." - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...s-found-chained-starving-california-home-say/
Also recall their "connection" to "Texas", a Bible beliving, gun carrying state, homeschooling state ...
It is reported:
"... The new revelations came as a California politician began drafting legislation to give greater oversight of home-schooled children, in a bid to prevent a repeat of the horrors.
Jose Medina told The Telegraph: “What happened in the city of Perris was tragic, and it was horrific. And I would like to try to do everything I can to ensure that it doesn’t happen again.”
The Turpins' 13 children, aged between two and 29, had all, except the eldest, been exclusively home-schooled - meaning that, under California law, there was no outside contact.
“One of the reasons this went undetected was because the parents could keep the children hidden from the public,” said Mr Medina. “So I’m looking at what the state can do, so that kids can no longer be kept in captivity.” Two million children in the US are home-schooled, representing three per cent of all American youngsters, according to the Mike Smith, president of the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA). The trend began in the 1970s, he told The Telegraph, but has increased in recent years. By contrast, in the UK only 30,000 children were educated at home in the 2016/17 academic year, out of over eight million. ..." -
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...home-littered-faeces-had-makeshift-classroom/
Jose Medina told The Telegraph: “What happened in the city of Perris was tragic, and it was horrific. And I would like to try to do everything I can to ensure that it doesn’t happen again.”
The Turpins' 13 children, aged between two and 29, had all, except the eldest, been exclusively home-schooled - meaning that, under California law, there was no outside contact.
“One of the reasons this went undetected was because the parents could keep the children hidden from the public,” said Mr Medina. “So I’m looking at what the state can do, so that kids can no longer be kept in captivity.” Two million children in the US are home-schooled, representing three per cent of all American youngsters, according to the Mike Smith, president of the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA). The trend began in the 1970s, he told The Telegraph, but has increased in recent years. By contrast, in the UK only 30,000 children were educated at home in the 2016/17 academic year, out of over eight million. ..." -
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...home-littered-faeces-had-makeshift-classroom/
Do you begin to see what this is all about? What 'they' are really after here?
Problems, inconsistencies.
1. The number 13. It is occult, and the media, 'those' socieities, etc all make use of such things [like the 32nd floor of Vegas, etc, etc.] to flag their events for themselves.
2. The photos. Why are they blocking out the adult 'children' [did I just say "adult children"???] who are over 18 years of age [one is even supposed to be 28]. There are numerous things going on in the photos. All the persons, even behind the 'masking' are smiling, and not in a forced way. The 'wife' looks pleasantly joyfilled. Posing, etc. Who is taking the photos at 'disneyland', a relative, a worker at the park, [where are their comments] etc?
3. Where are the 'adult' children interviews? I smell a book or other gimmicks in the coming, more 'funding' ...
4. Donation pages immediately went up.
5. Relative, is entirely suspicious, about letting someone watch them in the shower?
6. The underfed story doesn't add up either, look at the height and builds of the children in those photos. underfed don't gain such strength or height. Some are even as tall as or taller than their parents in those photos.
7. The chained up bit doesn't add up either, who were some of the ones who supposedly answered the door?
8. The escapee story makes little to no sense also, especially in regards the "deactivated" cell phone, and the "photos" she was carrying. Why not just run next door, bang on the door.
9. Ages in photos compared to current ages, etc.
etc., etc...
I am sure if people with more time, look into this, it will be seen for what it is. A theft of rights, a direct assault upon the constitution and the bill of rights, and amendments, therein. It was foretold:
So, is it Turpin-time to wash away a little more of those? To invade into the family home and to be able to direct the instruction of our children?
What was the 5th Commandment, Exodus 20:12 KJB? How can the children honour their father and mother, when the state interposes itself between them and the parents? It all goes back to Romanism. Read their humanist material, and their "human rights" list in their various encyclicals, bulls, etc., which the U.N. follows.
The Great Controversy, page 442 -
"... saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.” [Revelation 13:11-14.]
The lamb-like horns and dragon voice of the symbol point to a striking contradiction between the professions and the practice of the nation thus represented. The “speaking” of the nation is the action of its legislative and judicial authorities. By such action it will give the lie to those liberal and peaceful principles which it has put forth as the foundation of its policy. The prediction that it will speak “as a dragon,” and exercise “all the power of the first beast,” plainly foretells a development of the spirit of intolerance and persecution that was manifested by the nations represented by the dragon and the leopard-like beast. And the statement that the beast with two horns “causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast,” indicates that the authority of this nation is to be exercised in enforcing some observance which shall be an act of homage to the papacy.
Such action would be directly contrary to the principles of this government, to the genius of its free institutions, to the direct and solemn avowals of the Declaration of Independence, and to the Constitution. The founders of the nation wisely sought to guard against the employment of secular power on the part of the church, with its inevitable result—intolerance and persecution. The Constitution provides that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” and that “no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office of public trust under the United States.” Only in flagrant violation of these safeguards to the nation's liberty, can any religious observance be enforced by civil authority. But the inconsistency of such action is no greater than is represented in the symbol. It is the beast with lamb-like horns—in profession pure, gentle, and harmless—that speaks as a dragon. ..." - http://text.egwwritings.org/publica...ragraphnumber=&QUERY=constitution&resultId=29
The lamb-like horns and dragon voice of the symbol point to a striking contradiction between the professions and the practice of the nation thus represented. The “speaking” of the nation is the action of its legislative and judicial authorities. By such action it will give the lie to those liberal and peaceful principles which it has put forth as the foundation of its policy. The prediction that it will speak “as a dragon,” and exercise “all the power of the first beast,” plainly foretells a development of the spirit of intolerance and persecution that was manifested by the nations represented by the dragon and the leopard-like beast. And the statement that the beast with two horns “causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast,” indicates that the authority of this nation is to be exercised in enforcing some observance which shall be an act of homage to the papacy.
Such action would be directly contrary to the principles of this government, to the genius of its free institutions, to the direct and solemn avowals of the Declaration of Independence, and to the Constitution. The founders of the nation wisely sought to guard against the employment of secular power on the part of the church, with its inevitable result—intolerance and persecution. The Constitution provides that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” and that “no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office of public trust under the United States.” Only in flagrant violation of these safeguards to the nation's liberty, can any religious observance be enforced by civil authority. But the inconsistency of such action is no greater than is represented in the symbol. It is the beast with lamb-like horns—in profession pure, gentle, and harmless—that speaks as a dragon. ..." - http://text.egwwritings.org/publica...ragraphnumber=&QUERY=constitution&resultId=29
Testimionies to the Church, Volume 5, page 451:
"... By the decree enforcing the institution of the papacy in violation of the law of God, our nation will disconnect herself fully from righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near. ..." - http://text.egwwritings.org/publica...very+principle+of+its+Constitution&resultId=1
Link to resource site
Link to resource site
Last edited:
