Tucker Carlson leaves Fox without even a goodbye show.

[Servus]

He's worried and upset over climate change. Because that's the real problem we gotta worry about.

 

[Belk]

He's worried and upset over climate change. Because that's the real problem we gotta worry about.

No, he is whining about how the world is now different than his childhood and ignorant of how humans idolize the time between 10 - 30 years old.

Declinism: is the world actually getting worse? | Pete Etchells

Pete Etchells: A recent survey suggests that 71% of people think that the world is going to the dogs. Are things actually that bad, or is it a psychological trick of the mind?

www.theguardian.com

 

[Servus]

No, he is whining about how the world is now different than his childhood and ignorant of how humans idolize the time between 10 - 30 years old.

Declinism: is the world actually getting worse? | Pete Etchells

Pete Etchells: A recent survey suggests that 71% of people think that the world is going to the dogs. Are things actually that bad, or is it a psychological trick of the mind?

www.theguardian.com

Take a better look at your own hometown and where I work.

That's KOMO, not Fox.

 

[Belk]

Take a better look at your own hometown and where I work.

That's KOMO, not Fox.

Feel free to articulate the points you believe are relevant.

 

[CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN]

Here in England we put an apostrophe to denote possession. Not in the USA? So her name is Kat Kerr
Give me your best 'lie' then.

So she has nothing to with Tucker. Right? At least I hope not, since she says she wants to bring people to Heaven or God. How many times does Tucker need to proven, that he lies ? And so did others on The Fox News channel. The fox news channel knew this and keeps allowing. Tuckers is not doing good for Christians or people at all. I'm not lying at all. Tucker seems to be causing Christians to stumble. I expect better from a Conservative Network.

 

[Servus]

Feel free to articulate the points you believe are relevant.

Society is on a rapid decline because progressivism is making the world worse, not better.

 

[Say it aint so]

As a side thought out of curiosity and Tucker. McCarthy gave Tucker Jan6th tapes and pledged to provide the same for other media outlets, that was two months ago. What became of that?

 

[Belk]

Society is on a rapid decline because progressivism is making the world worse, not better.

I do not find your synopsis a likely summation. By almost all measures the world has been steadily getting better. I await metrics showing that to be incorrect.

 

[Servus]

I do not find your synopsis a likely summation. By almost all measures the world has been steadily getting better. I await metrics showing that to be incorrect.

So the rapidly declining state Seattle and a great deal of the rest of the country is in, which we can see with our own eyes, isn't really a problem because of what's on someone's metric chart.

 

[Bradskii]

...which we can see with our own eyes...

The very definition of anecdotal. I was hoping for some facts and figures that society as a whole is crumbling. Not some personal opinions on some small suburb of a medium sized US city.

 

[jameslouise]

Yes, because there is no evidence that illegal immigrants are voting. In fact, in the few cases where a few have been caught, from what I've seen, they voted for Trump/Republicans.



Basically, immigraition laws and procedures are largely unchanged from when Trump was in office; just that you have Republicans suggesting "open borders" supplying zero evidence or what has changed -- but likely their advertising "open borders" increases the numbers who try to illegally enter the country (which is exactly what they want with a Democratic President).



Well, Trump was President during the lock down period. Beyond that, it would seem to be more regionally based than actual party; with California being the most restrictive (and being straw manned to represent all Democrats). Trump also "insisted' on dodgy pharmacological intervention, as well -- what I suspect you are actually referring to -- promoting the vaccine (which he claims was only because of him).


As for which party is bigger on "freedom," I'd suggest the Democrats. Republicans like to talk about freedoms, even while taking them away. There are plenty of threads here about making it harder for people to vote, and they have talked openly about trying to limit the number of people voting. You have the Florida Governor going after a private company because he got upset that they criticized his policies, with the expresss purpose of "punishing" them for using their free speech rights. He is also trying to make it easier to sue the press and much harder to sue politicians. In fact, the owner of a Florida conservative radio station stated that this law would bring about “the death of conservative talk throughout the state of Florida.”

There are also numerous instances of voters in conservative states voting in new laws (something allowed in most US states, where an issue can be put on the ballot) and, the Republican government, decided they knew better and either severely restricted or reversed the measures the voters wanted.

But, to be fair, neither party is great on actual "freedom" -- they each want their own limits on what people can do.



I think you miss the point -- the point was that Tucker Carlson operated on "fear" -- and that examination of his last shows shows how he used it in most every show. He didn't really give any "fix" for the issues listed -- just that they should fear Democrats and, to prevent the "bad things" they should vote Republican.

But how about his fears about the "stolen election" which Tucker's text messages stated was a lie that he pushed to help ratings, as well as video clips showing he knew it was a lie, but he pushed them to "protect" Fox New's stock price.


Sorry, no. I don't accept this, much less the claims of whatever "prophet" made this statement. As for wanting Trump in a year or so, I've been hearing that from "prophets" (most of whom claimed that Trump would win in 2020) and it has yet to be true for the vast majority of Americans.


Yes, the emails given to the NY Post, who originally broke the story, had no header information. It was one of the big issues with the story when it was first released and one of the reasons neither Fox News nor the Wall Street Journal (both conservative news outlets) would report the story.



Again, which included conservative outlets such as the Wall Street Journal and Fox News -- the information was sketchy, at best, when it was released by the NY Post and neither Fox nor the Wall Street Journal could verify the information.




As stated, the 51 signers were all "former" already -- they had no government job to "resign" from.

Also, if you read the actual letter, they state that hey suspected that the Russians did have some legitimate emails -- that it is how they Russians operate, and then they mix in fake emails and photos along with legitimate one. This means that when some are verified as legitimate, many people accept the false ones as legitimate, as well.


As pointed out, she clearly prophesied that Trump would win in 2020. When it was announced he lost the vote, she claimed God would intervene and that Trump would end up certified the winner. When Biden was certified the winner, she claimed that Biden would not be inaugurated, that Trump would remain President. When Biden was inaugurated, she claimed Trump would be back as President by March -- and she just kept doing this over and over. She still claims, at least last I knew, that Biden will be removed and Trump will serve his full four year term that she claims he was "cheated" out of, despite the election coming up in 2024.

Great reply .and appreciated and interesting and informative for me although I disagree with nearly all your 'slanting'. Two things:
Generally, cant you feel it? the crescendo building? The rope-a-dope left throwing their last wild haymakers but the 8th round knock out approaches quickly. (Knock out by God that is). 'There's been a change in the force have you felt it?

When Biden was certified the winner, she claimed that Biden would not be inaugurated, that Trump would remain President. When Biden was inaugurated, she claimed Trump would be back as President by March

I think you misrepresent Kat Kerr, so show me where she said these please. She said Trump will win the election.I agree that point and we ll see about that.

 

[jameslouise]

Resignation from what?

Ever giving their politically motivated opinion as an expert again

So she has nothing to with Tucker. Right? At least I hope not, since she says she wants to bring people to Heaven or God. How many times does Tucker need to proven, that he lies ? And so did others on The Fox News channel. The fox news channel knew this and keeps allowing. Tuckers is not doing good for Christians or people at all. I'm not lying at all. Tucker seems to be causing Christians to stumble. I expect better from a Conservative Network

So no examples then?

 

[Larniavc]

Do you have to be a racist to have this view.?

If the view is replacement theory then yes. Very much so.

 

[USincognito]

That's KOMO, not Fox.

I had the feeling that KOMO was a Sinclaire owned station and sure enough, I was right.

 

[Servus]

I had the feeling that KOMO was a Sinclaire owned station and sure enough, I was right.

So it's all staged? Even though I see it with my own eyes?

I confess that I got KOMO mixed up with KIRO.

 

[USincognito]

So it's all staged? Even though I see it with my own eyes?

It's always nice to see So's law validated.

 

[jameslouise]

If the view is replacement theory then yes. Very much so

Ah i get where you are coming from now, having wikied some definition-establish a theory that has several repulsive/flat out racist parts to it and some other more reasonable points then anyone who says some of the more reasonable points can be branded with all the obnoxious ones.

Back to the original article and let me be more specific then, Carlson has said that Dems may be encouraging immigration because they perceive the immigrants will more likely vote Dem. Is that racist?
Carlson also says it may be that someone wants to overload the immigration system to cause societal breakdown and chaos. Is that racist?

 

[Servus]

It's always nice to see So's law validated.View attachment 330531

So what was your point regarding Sinclair?

 

[jameslouise]

The Left-Modern day spirit of the Sadducees and Pharisees?

Take a perfectly good law like 'honor the sabbath', (gives you a days rest and lets you get closer to God.) then the Pharisees took it to the nth degree and said spitting on the ground is watering it and work, or picking a bit of grain and eating it is laboring. and hence needs punishment. There, by their interpretation creating more problems than it solved.
Then the Sadduccees who doubted the supernatural.

Well on this forum i note that the left take a perfectly good idea about not being racist and take that to the nth degree too. Suddenly everything is racist. Thereby creating more problems than it solved.
I also note the left too tend to be skeptical about the supernatural,well see the stance on modern day prophets in this thread as an example?
Well we know what Jesus said about them 'outside bleached white but inside dead men's bones?
A valid comparison? What du think lefties?

 

[Belk]

So the rapidly declining state Seattle and a great deal of the rest of the country is in, which we can see with our own eyes, isn't really a problem because of what's on someone's metric chart.

No, the world is not in a rapidly declining state simply because there are problems. We can see this when we look at metrics. The ideas that everything is getting worse is a known human perception issue.