Really? That's interesting. Could you elaborate please. Which of my assumption are wrong?
Such as the assumption that a coup has to overthrow the entire government rather than resulting in a leader they feel is more easy to manipulate in the short term and beat in the longer term. Hence, your assumption that Pence has to be in on it rather than just a preferred alternative for those performing the coup.
We are now getting into an area that reminds me of cafeteria arguments involving 12-year old children. You don't want to call it a coup, then don't. I will continue to do so, because it is. But what I will not do is sit here and childishly argue over your redefinition of a word.
What I will also do is come back here after the Comey report is released and remind people that's step 1 of what I mentioned, and then I'll be back after the Horowitz report is released, and remind everyone that's step 2. Afterwards, when the massive declass has taken place, I will once again remind everyone that was step 3. I am in awe that any of you are still in denial about this stuff. It's not like it's some hidden information. Is it the constant indoctrination and dependency on liars that makes this stuff so hard to see?
Upvote
0