- Mar 23, 2004
- 248,794
- 114,491
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
A. It may or may not be true.
B. Who cares?
C. Even the article stated the biggest effect is that if they aren't replaced within a few months (huge assumption), the agency won't have an advocate when it comes time to secure a budget from Congress.
D. Because of C, see B.
From the story, "To some extent, what we’re talking about is the political leadership, the leadership appointed by each administration,” Rosner told Gizmodo."
So, the story is that Trump is replacing the head of an agency, under his Executive control, where the immediate effect would be there might not be an advocate for the agency's budget several months down the road. But that is only assuming he has no successors in mind, and just did it to do it. If he has successors in mind, and just hasn't announced them, then it's a non-story as they would then take on the role as budget advocates.
And this makes people freak out why?
I KNOW, right?
Upvote
0