Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Trump defends the storming of the Capitol: 'They were zero threat'
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tz620q" data-source="post: 75844327" data-attributes="member: 185759"><p>Yeah, I was trying to think through how a jury would see this. What type of equation can one use on rhetoric calling for stop the steal, when it is followed by a small print disclaimer to do it peacefully. It would make an interesting trial; but I think it would exhaust this countries dwindling supply of bipartisanship. </p><p></p><p>That is the real crime happening now. A while back I asked myself the question why anyone would try to tear down one's own country (city, neighborhood, etc.) Then the BLM people tried to come to my peaceful suburb to protest. The people were coming in buses from other cities to do this. It wasn't their town that would get torn up and someone was paying to bus them here. Our police stationed themselves at intersections and closed down all traffic. That proved somewhat effective. The only vandalism was the statue of the only police officer in our town's history to be killed in the line of duty was defaced one night. Hatred in any form is evil; but cannot be fought with more hatred.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tz620q, post: 75844327, member: 185759"] Yeah, I was trying to think through how a jury would see this. What type of equation can one use on rhetoric calling for stop the steal, when it is followed by a small print disclaimer to do it peacefully. It would make an interesting trial; but I think it would exhaust this countries dwindling supply of bipartisanship. That is the real crime happening now. A while back I asked myself the question why anyone would try to tear down one's own country (city, neighborhood, etc.) Then the BLM people tried to come to my peaceful suburb to protest. The people were coming in buses from other cities to do this. It wasn't their town that would get torn up and someone was paying to bus them here. Our police stationed themselves at intersections and closed down all traffic. That proved somewhat effective. The only vandalism was the statue of the only police officer in our town's history to be killed in the line of duty was defaced one night. Hatred in any form is evil; but cannot be fought with more hatred. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Trump defends the storming of the Capitol: 'They were zero threat'
Top
Bottom