Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Trump Can Be Sued For Inciting Jan. 6, Appeals Court Rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="A2SG" data-source="post: 77478464" data-attributes="member: 227164"><p>And I never claimed he was. A fact that you will confirm in your next post when you fail to quote me saying that.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I know the prosecution doesn't lack evidence. Judge Engoron knows that too, as he's already rendered a verdict on the fraud charges based on that evidence. We'll see how he rules on the other charges.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I understand the issues well enough. But I'm not going to be on the jury there, so who cares what I understand.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not really, since there are other charges. Judge Engoron just ruled on the charges of fraud in summary judgment.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You also thought the gag order would be tossed and ruled unconstitutional, so forgive me if I don't rely on your legal expertise.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not confused, and neither is Judge Engoron.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Dunno, I don't pay much attention to them.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You do know what a statute is, don't you?</p><p></p><p>And you wonder why I choose not to rely on your legal acumen?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Evidence that never seems to point where you think it points. At least, it isn't pointing toward impeachment or an indictment.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't know who made that claim, but it wasn't me. Maybe you should be arguing that point with whoever made that claim.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nah, he's being held responsible for fraud. Which he's guilty of. There are other charges pending, though, so there may be more things he's guilty of. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Yep.</p><p></p><p>You seem unclear on the fact that there are other charges facing Trump. Tell me again why I should rely on your legal expertise?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yup. To what extent is still to be determined.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Ah. So these supposed wire transfers directly and conclusively prove Biden is guilty of....um, what, exactly?</p><p></p><p>But I'm sure that will be in the articles of impeachment the House passed. Um, wait, where are those again....?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Your predictive powers haven't exactly impressed me to this point, dude.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Hey, it's a nice place to live. Could have better weather, though, but I can't complain. Well, I might if it snows....</p><p></p><p></p><p>Wow, you really are terrible at thinking you understand people, aren't you?</p><p></p><p>I think I get why you support Trump so ardently now.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yup. And sexual assault.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Trump supporters seem to think the Democratic party is so ruthlessly efficent that they were able to rig the 2020 election perfectly and successfully, leaving no trace whatsoever, and not one single person around anywhere to testify to their actions.</p><p></p><p>Blofeld would be proud.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry, my mistake.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The topic is Trump being sued for inciting the January 6 riot. Your interpretation of Trump's actions as president isn't relevant to that topic.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not at all. Dunno why you assumed that.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And yet, you weren't talking about Trump's charges at that point, you were talking about democrats and identity politics, black and white people...and cats, for some reason. To be honest, I have no idea what point you were going for there, but Trump's charges weren't even mentioned. </p><p></p><p></p><p>And that relates to the topic of Trump's charges how, exactly?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Hey, I'm not the one talking about Biden and Hilary Clinton, dude.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope, never. A fact that will also be confirmed in your next post when you fail to quote me saying that.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Who brought up President Biden and Hilary Clinton again? Not me.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nah, Trump's corrupt activities are pretty unique, I'd have to say. Even Nixon's seem pale by comparison.</p><p></p><p>We were on the topic of Trump's charges, remember?</p><p></p><p>-- A2SG, since you seem so concerned about staying on topic here.....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="A2SG, post: 77478464, member: 227164"] And I never claimed he was. A fact that you will confirm in your next post when you fail to quote me saying that. Nope. I know the prosecution doesn't lack evidence. Judge Engoron knows that too, as he's already rendered a verdict on the fraud charges based on that evidence. We'll see how he rules on the other charges. I understand the issues well enough. But I'm not going to be on the jury there, so who cares what I understand. Not really, since there are other charges. Judge Engoron just ruled on the charges of fraud in summary judgment. You also thought the gag order would be tossed and ruled unconstitutional, so forgive me if I don't rely on your legal expertise. I'm not confused, and neither is Judge Engoron. Dunno, I don't pay much attention to them. You do know what a statute is, don't you? And you wonder why I choose not to rely on your legal acumen? Evidence that never seems to point where you think it points. At least, it isn't pointing toward impeachment or an indictment. I don't know who made that claim, but it wasn't me. Maybe you should be arguing that point with whoever made that claim. Nah, he's being held responsible for fraud. Which he's guilty of. There are other charges pending, though, so there may be more things he's guilty of. Yep. You seem unclear on the fact that there are other charges facing Trump. Tell me again why I should rely on your legal expertise? Yup. To what extent is still to be determined. Ah. So these supposed wire transfers directly and conclusively prove Biden is guilty of....um, what, exactly? But I'm sure that will be in the articles of impeachment the House passed. Um, wait, where are those again....? Your predictive powers haven't exactly impressed me to this point, dude. Hey, it's a nice place to live. Could have better weather, though, but I can't complain. Well, I might if it snows.... Wow, you really are terrible at thinking you understand people, aren't you? I think I get why you support Trump so ardently now. Yup. And sexual assault. Trump supporters seem to think the Democratic party is so ruthlessly efficent that they were able to rig the 2020 election perfectly and successfully, leaving no trace whatsoever, and not one single person around anywhere to testify to their actions. Blofeld would be proud. Sorry, my mistake. The topic is Trump being sued for inciting the January 6 riot. Your interpretation of Trump's actions as president isn't relevant to that topic. Not at all. Dunno why you assumed that. And yet, you weren't talking about Trump's charges at that point, you were talking about democrats and identity politics, black and white people...and cats, for some reason. To be honest, I have no idea what point you were going for there, but Trump's charges weren't even mentioned. And that relates to the topic of Trump's charges how, exactly? Hey, I'm not the one talking about Biden and Hilary Clinton, dude. Nope, never. A fact that will also be confirmed in your next post when you fail to quote me saying that. Who brought up President Biden and Hilary Clinton again? Not me. Nah, Trump's corrupt activities are pretty unique, I'd have to say. Even Nixon's seem pale by comparison. We were on the topic of Trump's charges, remember? -- A2SG, since you seem so concerned about staying on topic here..... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Trump Can Be Sued For Inciting Jan. 6, Appeals Court Rules
Top
Bottom