If no transitional fossils exist, can a creationist explain to me what features a transitional fossil should/would have? As a creationist what do YOU expect a transitional fossil to look like?
A transitional fossil is in the eye of the beholder. The real question do we see Darwin's tree in the fossil record? The answer is no. The tree only exist in evolutionist mind.If no transitional fossils exist, can a creationist explain to me what features a transitional fossil should/would have? As a creationist what do YOU expect a transitional fossil to look like?
So....features?A transitional fossil is in the eye of the beholder. The real question do we see Darwin's tree in the fossil record? The answer is no. The tree only exist in evolutionist mind.
If no transitional fossils exist, can a creationist explain to me what features a transitional fossil should/would have? As a creationist what do YOU expect a transitional fossil to look like?
We see fossil D and fossil J. Then fossil F IS a transitional fossil. But, that is not good enough. If evolution is true, then the simple idea says we SHOULD also have fossils E, F, G, H, and I. More than that, we should also see D90%E10%, D80%E20%, ... etc.
Should we not?
A transitional fossil is in the eye of the beholder. The real question do we see Darwin's tree in the fossil record? The answer is no. The tree only exist in evolutionist mind.
We see fossil D and fossil J. Then fossil F IS a transitional fossil. But, that is not good enough. If evolution is true, then the simple idea says we SHOULD also have fossils E, F, G, H, and I. More than that, we should also see D90%E10%, D80%E20%, ... etc.
Should we not?
Why would we see a tree of modern organisms in the fossil record??A transitional fossil is in the eye of the beholder. The real question do we see Darwin's tree in the fossil record? The answer is no. The tree only exist in evolutionist mind.
If no transitional fossils exist, can a creationist explain to me what features a transitional fossil should/would have? As a creationist what do YOU expect a transitional fossil to look like?
The question was if they did exist what would features would you expect them to have. You're basically saying that since they don't exist they don't have any features to expect.I have explained to you all many times what features a transitional fossil would have, yet you constantly ignore it and propose fantasy. There are no transitional fossils, just as there are no transitional species between the Husky or Mastiff and the Chinook. If no transitional fossils exist, then how could anyone explain to you what they look like since they do not exist. As a creationist I expect them to have no features - since they do not exist.
When a Chinese person mates with an African person and an Afro-Asian race comes into being, there are no transitional states between the Chinese or the African and the Afro-Asian. Why must you keep insisting we ignore how life propagates as per empirical observations??????
Any plant, animal, or human being that ever lived, lived between 4004 BC and AD 2015.If no transitional fossils exist, can a creationist explain to me what features a transitional fossil should/would have? As a creationist what do YOU expect a transitional fossil to look like?
I have explained to you all many times what features a transitional fossil would have,
The question was if they did exist what would features would you expect them to have. You're basically saying that since they don't exist they don't have any features to expect.
If no transitional fossils exist, can a creationist explain to me what features a transitional fossil should/would have? As a creationist what do YOU expect a transitional fossil to look like?
Yet you didn't describe those features in your post.
Because none exist to describe in your meaning of the word. There is no evolution of one species into another through mutation. There is only breed mating with breed producing new breeds - as per empirical observation.
But if you insist, a transitional of an Afro-Asian would look like both an African and an Asian, since that is their ancestors. There must be the Asian and there must be the African - not a singular thing, but a "pair."
"Transitional fossils" is a human concept that takes the place of creation.So....features?
"Transitional fossils" is a human concept that takes the place of creation.
Evolutionists make the rules and set the guidelines as to what constitutes a "transitional fossil."
To challenge [instant] creationists to identify features of something that doesn't exist is like I issuing a challenge to show evidence for an apple created ex nihilo.
I have explained to you all many times what features a transitional fossil would have, yet you constantly ignore it and propose fantasy.
There are no transitional fossils, just as there are no transitional species between the Husky or Mastiff and the Chinook.
If no transitional fossils exist, then how could anyone explain to you what they look like since they do not exist?
As a creationist I expect them to have no features - since they do not exist.
When a Chinese person mates with an African person and an Afro-Asian race comes into being, there are no transitional states between the Chinese or the African and the Afro-Asian.
But we can not even consider the ones between the first and the last as transitional in your meaning of the word (i.e., caused by evolution through mutation) because we know it occurred by breed mating . . .
I know this one! Crocoduck, because evolutionists have been searching for these for hundreds of years, because theirs billions.If no transitional fossils exist, can a creationist explain to me what features a transitional fossil should/would have? As a creationist what do YOU expect a transitional fossil to look like?
If no transitional fossils exist, can a creationist explain to me what features a transitional fossil should/would have? As a creationist what do YOU expect a transitional fossil to look like?