Transcript released

[Always in His Presence]

GOP releases Devon Archer transcript after lawmakers give conflicting accounts

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) on Thursday released the transcript of a closed-door interview the panel conducted with Devon Archer, the former business associate of Hunter Biden whom Republicans view as a key witness in their investigation into the Biden family’s...

news.yahoo.com

Here it is

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Devon-Archer-Transcript.pdf

 

[JosephZ]

So according to Archer's testimony, President Biden never had any involvement with Burisma, never discussed business with Hunter, or any of his business partners, never received any money, and he isn't aware of any wrongdoing by Biden.

I hope this can all be put to rest now.

 

[Vambram]

So according to Archer's testamony, President Biden never had any involvement with Burisma, never discussed business with Hunter, or any of his business partners, never received any money, and he isn't aware of any wrongdoing by Biden.

I hope this can all be put to rest now.

Amazing. You read that entire 141 page document in 10 minutes.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Q If someone were to conclude from this that this is evidence, this Form 1023
is evidence that Joe Biden was bribed by Mykola Zlochevsky, would you disagree with
that conclusion?

A Yeah, I would.

 

[JosephZ]

Amazing. You read that entire 141 page document in 10 minutes.

It was released a few hours ago.

 

[Vambram]

READ: House Judiciary Committee Releases Full Devon Archer Transcript - Reveals Critical New Details Including Why Joe Biden Was the Reason Burisma Did Not Go Bankrupt | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen Linebarger

On Thursday, the House Judiciary Committee released the full transcript of Devon Archer’s testimony to Congress and it is damning.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

This article has a different analysis and point of view.

 

[JosephZ]

This article has a different analysis and point of view.

Why not just read the transcript for yourself?

Q: “Did you have any knowledge of Joe Biden having any involvement with Burisma?”

Archer: “No.”

Q: “Are you aware of any wrongdoing by Vice President Biden?”

Archer: “No, I’m not aware of any.”

 

[essentialsaltes]

Q Did Hunter Biden ever tell you, "I can get my dad to change U.S. policy"?
A No.
Q Are you aware of Hunter Biden ever asking his dad to change foreign policy?
A No.
Q Are you ever -- were you ever privy to any conversations between Hunter
Biden and Joe Biden in which they discussed how --
A No.
Q -- Joe Biden would --
A No.
Q -- take official actions on behalf of Hunter Biden?
A No.

Q So is it fair to say that Hunter Biden was selling the illusion of access to his
his
A Yeah.

Q So when you talk about selling the brand --
A Uh-huh.
Q -- it's not about selling access to his father. It's about selling the illusion of access to his father. Is that fair?
A Is that fair? I mean, yeah, that is -- I think that's -- that's almost fair. Almost fair.
Q Almost Fair? Why almost fair?
A Because there -- there is -- there are touch points and contact points that I
can't deny that happened, but nothing of material was discussed.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

The biggest conclusion I can draw from this testimony is that Hunter Biden appears to be a pretty talented grifter. He knows how the game is played, and therefore knows how to look like he has more influence than he actually does. He knows that his father will pick up the phone any time he calls due to the succession of tragedies that their family has suffered over the years and his own personal struggles with substance abuse and mental health, so he makes use of that. He also takes every opportunity to hint that he could be behind any favorable moves by the US government.

 

[durangodawood]

Biden's role in family business deals grows easier to deny.

 

[SavedByGrace3]

Amazing how people can read the same material and come away with the complete opposite conclusions.
Reminds me of the Monty Python dead parrot skit.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Amazing how people can read the same material and come away with the complete opposite conclusions.

So what parts would you like to quote?

 

[The IbanezerScrooge]

I finished reading the whole transcript. There is literally no statement in that transcript to indicate that Joe Biden had any knowledge of or assisted his son in any way with regard to his business. Archer answers in the negative to every question that directly asks about Joe Biden providing any kind of business support to Hunter or any company with which they were working. There is no evidence of any payments made to Joe Biden and Archer has no knowledge of any payments. He literally didn't actually recognize the actual emails he supposedly sent and only vaguely recollected the topics being discussed in them. Most of the things he testified to he had only been "refreshed" in his memory from the materials they were talking about.

I also find it interesting that most of the Democratic members of the committee had their names redacted. Is that a procedure thing or?

 

[SavedByGrace3]

I finished reading the whole transcript. There is literally no statement in that transcript to indicate that Joe Biden had any knowledge of or assisted his son in any way with regard to his business. Archer answers in the negative to every question that directly asks about Joe Biden providing any kind of business support to Hunter or any company with which they were working. There is no evidence of any payments made to Joe Biden and Archer has no knowledge of any payments. He literally didn't actually recognize the actual emails he supposedly sent and only vaguely recollected the topics being discussed in them. Most of the things he testified to he had only been "refreshed" in his memory from the materials they were talking about.

I also find it interesting that most of the Democratic members of the committee had their names redacted. Is that a procedure thing or?

"Who? Joe Biden? Who is he?"

 

[Pommer]

Was Mister Archer even under oath?

 

[The IbanezerScrooge]

"Who? Joe Biden? Who is he?"

What are you talking about? You think that being the son of a VP should somehow disqualify Hunter from doing business altogether? I don't understand. Archer even testified that that's how business is done in that part of the world. The illusion of influence, who you know, what you bring to the table.

What parts of the transcript would you like to quote that shows whatever it is you think is the crime or wrong-doing the Republicans are accusing Joe Biden of?

 

[The IbanezerScrooge]

I would also like to point out that Archer's testimony seems to have pretty solidly affirmed Hunter's qualifications for the job for which he was hired by Burisma to do and whatever payment they agreed to.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Was Mister Archer even under oath?

Good question. I assumed he was, but...

You should also understand that, although this interview is not under oath, that by law you are required to answer questions from Congress truthfully.

 

[The IbanezerScrooge]

Was Mister Archer even under oath?

He was not, but still subject to criminal charges for making false statements:

Mr. Mandolfo. You should also understand that, although this interview is not under oath, that by law you are required to answer questions from Congress truthfully. Do you understand that? ​

​

Mr. Archer. I do. ​

​

Mr. Mandolfo. This also applies to questions posed by congressional staff during interviews. Do you understand that? ​

​

Mr. Archer. I do. ​

​

Mr. Mandolfo. Witnesses who knowingly provide false testimony could be subject to criminal prosecution for perjury or making false statements. Do you understand? ​

​

Mr. Archer. I do. ​

 

[Pommer]

He was not, but still subject to criminal charges for making false statements:

Mr. Mandolfo. You should also understand that, although this interview is not under oath, that by law you are required to answer questions from Congress truthfully. Do you understand that? ​

​

Mr. Archer. I do. ​

​

Mr. Mandolfo. This also applies to questions posed by congressional staff during interviews. Do you understand that? ​

​

Mr. Archer. I do. ​

​

Mr. Mandolfo. Witnesses who knowingly provide false testimony could be subject to criminal prosecution for perjury or making false statements. Do you understand? ​

​

Mr. Archer. I do. ​

Well then TheSpin®️will be: “we have to get Devon Archer to testify under oath since he obviously lied!”