• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Topless Danes

TheReasoner

Atheist. Former Christian.
Mar 14, 2005
10,294
684
Norway
✟37,162.00
Country
Norway
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Alot of what you mention I have agreed about in previous posts - yes, you can wear a burlap sack and be enticing to men by suggestive body gestures of any kind, eye contact or words - but the MOTIVE there is obvious and it's key becuz it's based in flesh or Spirit.

As for a debate on head coverings - that doesn't "allow" for deeming toplessness as a decent moral dress code for a Christian. If they're told to even cover the head, I HARDLY think we can surmize that Paul's call for "modesty" can also mean taking off women's tops to go bare chested in public.
If anything, that leads to an argument towards how LITTLE we should be revealing with our clothing, not how much we can take off.
(I hope you get what I'm driving at with the logic & reasoning of that discrepancy - I do know what you're relaying, I'm simply saying that even in that discrepancy, it doesn't lend to taking MORE off, but just the opposite).

Outside of "the Bible", we have general revelation of God, by God of right and wrong. And I find it an interesting coincidence in what bible believing Christians have believed and supported all thru their existance, and what the world accepts & promotes morally. (ie. immorally).
The pattern & trend right there shows the distinct difference in moral behaviour and worldviews of the 2 groups. So for people who claim Christianity to support female nudity of any kind, I kinda see a conflict there.

This is why I ask for some teachings of prominant Christian professionals over the centuries up to today; what is the predominance of the CHRISTIAN message on dress code and morality?
It's certainly not partial & full nudity - it's to cover up due to the male's hardwiring of visual sexual stimulation of the female body.
This is just a general fact that we should ALL be taking into account; ie. common sense!

Just the biblical point of "stumbling another into sin or temptation" is enough right there to claim that it's wrong due to male [visual] hardwiring.

I don't care if 2 out of 2000 [hetero] men aren't "breast men"... the other 1998 ARE. How is she to know which ones they were in her "audience"? I also know that young males moving into puberty are extremely visually oriented and it takes them much less to be aroused than the normal male who's regularly engaging in sex for "release". What of the younger boys who see them on the beach at the pool/spas?

Further, the more of her body she's exposing in being even 1/2 nude, the more men see of her to draw attn. to her nude body and further entice them to think more sexually.

This is just common sense observation; nevermind the Bible even tho that's clear enough and the examples we have from it don't relay any type of nudity as acceptable for Christians.

The WORLD can live how they will, but it doesn't make it acceptable in God's eyes and I don't see anywhere where God tells us to judge right and wrong by how other cultures behave.

I don't see the validity of this argument on several levels; secular or Christian. (and I might add that many non christians are against female toplessness as well; it's not only a Christian position).

AGAIN, your argument is flawed because it assumes that all cultures are the same. They are not. In a culture where breasts are not commonly seen, then they should be covered. In a culture, such as tribal cultures in remote areas, where breasts are seen, and have been seen for thousands of years it is not a factor.

Paul's call to modesty does not mean you should go bare breasted in a culture where that is not socially acceptable. BUT in a culture where it is the norm, deviating too far from that norm can actually become indecent. I know this is hard for a person without much intercultural experience to understand, so I guess you'll have to take my word for it.
 
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Shorts, cut to the bottom of your behind, is one thing. There are modest shorts. Christian women should not wear two piece bathingsuits in public for obvious reasons. There are modest bathing suit apparel available including the little skirts that you can walk around in while not in the water. We can choose not to get the one pieces, with the slit in the front all the way down to our belly buttons, and the thong back...have mercy.

We know the "culture" in most of the places you mentioned is highly sexual ALL the way around. What is acceptable to man, is usually not acceptable to God, unless a man has a renewed mind, having been washed by the water of the Word, so that his thoughtlife is changed from carnal to spiritual.

I agree that it is best for men to minister to men and vice versa when it comes to one on one. It definitely would not only reduce temptations but also eliminate false accusations or appearances of evil.

To compare people living highly sexual lifestyles in modernized countries to tribes is such a ridiculous comparison. :doh:


Yes, you do. Because not long ago you might have substituted topless for 'in a swimsuit'. And not long before that "in short trousers" - before that "in trousers" and before that you could simply say "A woman goes up to a man on the beach and she starts telling him about Jesus...... need I say more?"
Besides, it is completely dependent on the culture. In the US it is highly inappropriate, yes. In Norway it's not as OK as it is in Denmark or Sweden, but it's not unthinkable. Though in general it is often a good idea to let men minister to men and women to women. Can save us a lot of heartache.



That's your opinion. I can understand why you think this is so, but I am happy to tell you that you're wrong. At least as far as I am concerned. I can't speak for everyone here, of course. We are to serve God in everything. Absolutely! Are you telling me that women in tribes native to the Amazon cannot minister to others in their community because they are topless and have been for more generations than we can count?


Aren't you forgetting this and substituting it for legalism? We're not advocating looseness. Or edging close to the edge. We're trying to help you understand that the world does not end at your doorstep. It's huge! And while wearing a bikini on US beaches is OK, it is highly inappropriate in the middle east. And while wearing nothing on your torso is bad in the US, it is quite alright in many other places in the world. It doesn't mean there's excessive focus on sex. It doesn't mean there's rampant lust and fornication. It does not mean that the people who don't wear anything to cover their breasts are any worse or less Christians than you are. I can understand that you - if you are an American who have not seen other cultures - can say these things. BUt I would encourage you as a brother in Christ to open your eyes and see the world we are in. Not to make you think immorality is OK. But that you may see that your own perception of reality is limited by being a human being and limited further by your lack of intercultural experience.
 
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Her argument is NOT flawed, Your relativistic reasoning is.
You want to use oranges to talk about apples.



AGAIN, your argument is flawed because it assumes that all cultures are the same. They are not. In a culture where breasts are not commonly seen, then they should be covered. In a culture, such as tribal cultures in remote areas, where breasts are seen, and have been seen for thousands of years it is not a factor.

Paul's call to modesty does not mean you should go bare breasted in a culture where that is not socially acceptable. BUT in a culture where it is the norm, deviating too far from that norm can actually become indecent. I know this is hard for a person without much intercultural experience to understand, so I guess you'll have to take my word for it.
 
Upvote 0

TheReasoner

Atheist. Former Christian.
Mar 14, 2005
10,294
684
Norway
✟37,162.00
Country
Norway
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Shorts, cut to the bottom of your behind, is one thing. There are modest shorts. Christian women should not wear two piece bathingsuits in public for obvious reasons. There are modest bathing suit apparel available including the little skirts that you can walk around in while not in the water. We can choose not to get the one pieces, with the slit in the front all the way down to our belly buttons, and the thong back...have mercy.

Even they are immodest many places. And going back in time they'd have been terribly immodest even in the most liberal places.

We know the "culture" in most of the places you mentioned is highly sexual ALL the way around. What is acceptable to man, is usually not acceptable to God, unless a man has a renewed mind, having been washed by the water of the Word, so that his thoughtlife is changed from carnal to spiritual.

No, it isn't. But you need to take a look at the US. I know of few places more sex-fixated than the falsely modest US of A. Also, I really think you're being a bit closeminded. Have you been outside the US for any length of time? (Canada doesn't count. Too similar.)
What you consider carnal may not be so. What you consider OK may very well not be so. I imagine you don't fret at the US diet of choice? Yet I am leaning towards calling it sinful. What about 'Christian' plastic toys made in china? Many of them are made in conditions worse than most slaves had in the US. I would consider buying them sinful. I guess you wouldn't. Maybe not until reading this anyway. And then there's Christmas. Yet all of these things are not really up to par when it comes to comparing it to nudity. Because these things actually harm people. They actually do a LOT of damage. Toplessness can too. But it is not universal. If you buy toys that support sweatshop labor - then that is pretty much universally immoral. Yet if you walk topless as a tribeswoman, it isn't. It isn't sexual in the least.

I agree that it is best for men to minister to men and vice versa when it comes to one on one. It definitely would not only reduce temptations but also eliminate false accusations or appearances of evil.

:) We agree on that, then. So it seems anyway.

To compare people living highly sexual lifestyles in modernized countries to tribes is such a ridiculous comparison. :doh:

Correction. It seems so because to YOU in YOUR culture the differences on this particular point are astronomical. That doesn't mean that in that tribal setting it is wrong. And it seems you agree that in these tribes it is OK to be topless.
What you fail to realize however is that even in the west there are huge cultural differences. My wife used to be a missionary in Kosovo. Kosovo albanians have huge cultural differences. Yet they themselves believe they have a mindset and a culture which is nearly identical to that of the US or western Europe. It's completely wrong. In the 80s it was normal for Kosovo men in villages to have two wives. When someone dies he spends a fair amount of time - post mortem - in his family livingroom. On the couch. Or on a bed in the garden. Weddings last for three days. Day -1 the bride to be is supposed to ball her eyes out while with friends. Day one she's supposed to keeo crying and I think she is supposed to cry even through day two. Day three she's supposed to be standing perfectly still in the husband's livingroom, after which he and his wife are ushered into a bedroom where they consumate. And the very next day she's supposed to clean the yard to a spotless, perfect yard.
The Kosovoalbanians have huge cultural differences from the rest of the west. So do the US. You don't realize it, but there are huge differences.
One can always spot American tourists by how loud they are. Always making their presence felt and heard long before you see them. It isn't wrong to be so loud. But if they were - for example - Norwegians acting like that, it would be seen as very very rude and arrogant.

These cultural differences are not necessarily bad. It isn't necessarily bad to be loud compared to what a Scandinavian is. It can be, if you're a Scandinavian. But it in itself isn't bad. It can be very bad not to clean your inlaws yard meticulously the day after your wedding. It isn't everywhere, but it is in Kosovo. It may be very bad to be topless, it isn't everywhere. But it is many places.
 
Upvote 0

TheReasoner

Atheist. Former Christian.
Mar 14, 2005
10,294
684
Norway
✟37,162.00
Country
Norway
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Her argument is NOT flawed, Your relativistic reasoning is.
You want to use oranges to talk about apples.

No... Not really. And yes. It is flawed. You fail to realize the diversity in cultures. I want to talk about apples while using apples to talk about them. The problem is that you have so little experience with cultural differences it is practically impossible. How do you explain flight to someone who has neither seen nor heard of the possibility? Or colors to a man who was born blind?
I don't mean to sound derogatory here, nor arrogant. But really, it is a bigger issue than you think. Inexperience I mean. And while inexperience isn't wrong or evil, it can be a hindrance.
 
Upvote 0

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
AGAIN, your argument is flawed because it assumes that all cultures are the same. They are not. In a culture where breasts are not commonly seen, then they should be covered. In a culture, such as tribal cultures in remote areas, where breasts are seen, and have been seen for thousands of years it is not a factor.

Paul's call to modesty does not mean you should go bare breasted in a culture where that is not socially acceptable. BUT in a culture where it is the norm, deviating too far from that norm can actually become indecent. I know this is hard for a person without much intercultural experience to understand, so I guess you'll have to take my word for it.
No, I think your argument is flawed becuz you are using CULTURE AS YOUR BASIS FOR WHAT IS MORAL, when Christians use the Bible and the Holy Spirit within us that guides us OUTSIDE OF AND DESPITE CULTURE/ WORLDLY TREND.

I again lift up the OT where God specifically tells His people that they are NOT to look like or practice what the worldly pagans/gentile/heathens were that surrounded them. That is clear evidence by example that we aren't to be guided by others in the world, but God.

God didn't tell them to "blend", He told them to be set apart as His holy people. We aren't called to live by cultures around us - worldly ones at that. They also have legal nude beaches; full frontal nudity, is that ok too?
Scripture has alot to say about nakedness - it's always tied in with judgment (spiritual and/or physical) punishment, or shame, dishonour, disgrace and poverty.

We have numerous NT scriptures saying not to live like the world, not to follow the world, to 'COME OUT FROM THEM & BE SEPARATE' unto God. Not to be conformed to the world but transformed by renewing our minds in Christ... etc.
That is not a call to follow the skin trends of the world that decide to go topless, nor it is to take street drugs when they become legal, promote or condone abortion or prostitution or homosexuality or anything else they decide is legally fine.

What of stumbling others with a 1/2 naked body? I see no promotion of it in scripture for general living and Adam & Eve knew to cover up at the fall before human population even started. They knew inwardly.

And again, you haven't listed for me any of the Christian leaders who were promoting open nudity for Christians in the past or present. I looked and haven't found any. There should be PLENTY of them if we're to be morally guided by culture over and above scripture command.
 
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Even they are immodest many places. And going back in time they'd have been terribly immodest even in the most liberal places.

That may be so, and in many ways I can see where they are coming from, however they are the extreme the one way, while total nudity is the extreme the other way in civilized society. But trying to compare any of civilized society to tribes, so that you can attempt to apply relativistic reasoning is still ridiculous.


No, it isn't. But you need to take a look at the US. I know of few places more sex-fixated than the falsely modest US of A. Also, I really think you're being a bit closeminded. Have you been outside the US for any length of time? (Canada doesn't count. Too similar.)

Yes, I am aware of those places and think it is highly disgusting for a father to take his little girl there such as Mazo Beach, which a Church there and the community is fighting for very good reasons. Look at this picture toward the bottom of the page. Her father is a pervert in my opinion. Does that little girl look like she is glad to be going where he is taking her? I don't think so. http://www.pccmonroe.org/Mazo.htm


What you consider carnal may not be so.

But what God does is.

What you consider OK may very well not be so.

Maybe, but I doubt it. I am pretty conservative in my beliefs and in the way I dress. I do believe it would be better to err on the conservative side though if one is going to err, because God looks on the heart and knows the intentions thereof.

A highly sexual "civilized" society, has manifested the outward appearance of what is absolutely going on in their hearts.

Muslims and those in India and others that dress such for instance, may be extreme in their dress codes, but they are absolutely making the better choice between the two extremes.

I imagine you don't fret at the US diet of choice?
Yet I am leaning towards calling it sinful.

Off topic, start a thread and we can talk about "the US diet".

What about 'Christian' plastic toys made in china?
Many of them are made in conditions worse than most slaves had in the US. I would consider buying them sinful. I guess you wouldn't. Maybe not until reading this anyway.

Off topic, start a thread, and we can talk about the "slavery of toy making in China"

And then there's Christmas.

Off topic, start a thread, and we can talk about "the commercialization of Christmas"


Yet all of these things are not really up to par when it comes to comparing it to nudity. Because these things actually harm people. They actually do a LOT of damage. Toplessness can too. But it is not universal. If you buy toys that support sweatshop labor - then that is pretty much universally immoral. Yet if you walk topless as a tribeswoman, it isn't. It isn't sexual in the least.

Again, you are appealing to relativistic reasoning, by attempting to talk about apples by using oranges as an example.



:) We agree on that, then. So it seems anyway.

Well, praise God we can agree on something. lol

Correction. It seems so because to YOU in YOUR culture the differences on this particular point are astronomical. That doesn't mean that in that tribal setting it is wrong. And it seems you agree that in these tribes it is OK to be topless.

Again, this is an orange, attempting to be used to discuss the
issues of apples. Inapplicable.


What you fail to realize however is that even in the west there are huge cultural differences. My wife used to be a missionary in Kosovo. Kosovo albanians have huge cultural differences. Yet they themselves believe they have a mindset and a culture which is nearly identical to that of the US or western Europe. It's completely wrong. In the 80s it was normal for Kosovo men in villages to have two wives. When someone dies he spends a fair amount of time - post mortem - in his family livingroom. On the couch. Or on a bed in the garden. Weddings last for three days. Day -1 the bride to be is supposed to ball her eyes out while with friends. Day one she's supposed to keeo crying and I think she is supposed to cry even through day two. Day three she's supposed to be standing perfectly still in the husband's livingroom, after which he and his wife are ushered into a bedroom where they consumate. And the very next day she's supposed to clean the yard to a spotless, perfect yard.

What does any of that have to do with the price of eggs in China?
Now you are trying to use bananas to discuss the issues with apples.

The Kosovoalbanians have huge cultural differences from the rest of the west. So do the US. You don't realize it, but there are huge differences.
One can always spot American tourists by how loud they are. Always making their presence felt and heard long before you see them. It isn't wrong to be so loud. But if they were - for example - Norwegians acting like that, it would be seen as very very rude and arrogant.

More bananas. :sigh:

These cultural differences are not necessarily bad. It isn't necessarily bad to be loud compared to what a Scandinavian is. It can be, if you're a Scandinavian. But it in itself isn't bad. It can be very bad not to clean your inlaws yard meticulously the day after your wedding. It isn't everywhere, but it is in Kosovo.

More bananas :sigh:

It may be very bad to be topless, it isn't everywhere. But it is many places.

It is if they do not do it to go to Church, work or school. Unlike "tribes", all of the people in the highly sexual countries where this is taking place that live in civilized societies, would not show up to work, Church or school in that state of "undress", therefore that appeal is still inapplicable.
 
Upvote 0

LJSGM

Senior Veteran
May 7, 2006
5,892
353
Wisconsin
✟30,171.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Yes, you do. Because not long ago you might have substituted topless for 'in a swimsuit'. And not long before that "in short trousers" - before that "in trousers" and before that you could simply say "A woman goes up to a man on the beach and she starts telling him about Jesus...... need I say more?"
Besides, it is completely dependent on the culture. In the US it is highly inappropriate, yes. In Norway it's not as OK as it is in Denmark or Sweden, but it's not unthinkable. Though in general it is often a good idea to let men minister to men and women to women. Can save us a lot of heartache.



That's your opinion. I can understand why you think this is so, but I am happy to tell you that you're wrong. At least as far as I am concerned. I can't speak for everyone here, of course. We are to serve God in everything. Absolutely! Are you telling me that women in tribes native to the Amazon cannot minister to others in their community because they are topless and have been for more generations than we can count?


Aren't you forgetting this and substituting it for legalism? We're not advocating looseness. Or edging close to the edge. We're trying to help you understand that the world does not end at your doorstep. It's huge! And while wearing a bikini on US beaches is OK, it is highly inappropriate in the middle east. And while wearing nothing on your torso is bad in the US, it is quite alright in many other places in the world. It doesn't mean there's excessive focus on sex. It doesn't mean there's rampant lust and fornication. It does not mean that the people who don't wear anything to cover their breasts are any worse or less Christians than you are. I can understand that you - if you are an American who have not seen other cultures - can say these things. BUt I would encourage you as a brother in Christ to open your eyes and see the world we are in. Not to make you think immorality is OK. But that you may see that your own perception of reality is limited by being a human being and limited further by your lack of intercultural experience.

You do not realize that your focus is on what you can and can't do, when it should be about how can you can serve the Lord better.

Romans 14:21
21It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother to fall.

If this is speaking of other Christian brothers, how much more so for those that do not know the Lord.

I would have to agree with nadine in this. The breasts are a sexual objects, and it's actually silly to deny this or ignore this fact. I have no desire to expose my privates to the public, but even if I did desire to do so, I would have no good reason or motives to do it (unless trying to attract attention from men, or vanity are good reasons) nor any reason to promote this behavior amoungst other christian women. Sure, I have exposed myself a little a few times... in order to breastfeed, but that serves a good purpose that isn't vanity or selfishness.


And yes, if I went to a muslim country and the women found it offensive what I wore and I could reach more for Christ by wearing a black robe I would wear it.

1 Corinthians 9
19Though I am free and belong to no man, I make myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. 20To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law. 21To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God's law but am under Christ's law), so as to win those not having the law. 22To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I might save some. 23I do all this for the sake of the gospel, that I may share in its blessings.


You don't have a very good grasp on what legalism is I'm afraid.
 
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
:amen::preach:

No, I think your argument is flawed becuz you are using CULTURE AS YOUR BASIS FOR WHAT IS MORAL, when Christians use the Bible and the Holy Spirit within us that guides us OUTSIDE OF AND DESPITE CULTURE/ WORLDLY TREND.

I again lift up the OT where God specifically tells His people that they are NOT to look like or practice what the worldly pagans/gentile/heathens were that surrounded them. That is clear evidence by example that we aren't to be guided by others in the world, but God.

God didn't tell them to "blend", He told them to be set apart as His holy people. We aren't called to live by cultures around us - worldly ones at that. They also have legal nude beaches; full frontal nudity, is that ok too?
Scripture has alot to say about nakedness - it's always tied in with judgment (spiritual and/or physical) punishment, or shame, dishonour, disgrace and poverty.

We have numerous NT scriptures saying not to live like the world, not to follow the world, to 'COME OUT FROM THEM & BE SEPARATE' unto God. Not to be conformed to the world but transformed by renewing our minds in Christ... etc.
That is not a call to follow the skin trends of the world that decide to go topless, nor it is to take street drugs when they become legal, promote or condone abortion or prostitution or homosexuality or anything else they decide is legally fine.

What of stumbling others with a 1/2 naked body? I see no promotion of it in scripture for general living and Adam & Eve knew to cover up at the fall before human population even started. They knew inwardly.

And again, you haven't listed for me any of the Christian leaders who were promoting open nudity for Christians in the past or present. I looked and haven't found any. There should be PLENTY of them if we're to be morally guided by culture over and above scripture command.
 
Upvote 0

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No... Not really. And yes. It is flawed. You fail to realize the diversity in cultures. I want to talk about apples while using apples to talk about them. The problem is that you have so little experience with cultural differences it is practically impossible. How do you explain flight to someone who has neither seen nor heard of the possibility? Or colors to a man who was born blind?
I don't mean to sound derogatory here, nor arrogant. But really, it is a bigger issue than you think. Inexperience I mean. And while inexperience isn't wrong or evil, it can be a hindrance.
Amsterdam legalizes street drugs, Canada legalized heroin clinics to oversee that people who use heroine shoot up correctly without causing aids, prostitution is legal in Amsterdam as well.
It's legal to commit abortion and partial birth in American culture, it's necessary to mutilate female genitalia in another country..

where do you want to go with how I need to follow other cultures to decide what's ok to do?
My morality and worldview is dictated by my Lord & Master, YHWY. NOT the world I live in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IamRedeemed
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
:amen::preach:


You do not realize that your focus is on what you can and can't do, when it should be about how can you can serve the Lord better.

Romans 14:21
21It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother to fall.

If this is speaking of other Christian brothers, how much more so for those that do not know the Lord.

I would have to agree with nadine in this. The breasts are a sexual objects, and it's actually silly to deny this or ignore this fact. I have no desire to expose my privates to the public, but even if I did desire to do so, I would have no good reason or motives to do it (unless trying to attract attention from men, or vanity are good reasons) nor any reason to promote this behavior amoungst other christian women. Sure, I have exposed myself a little a few times... in order to breastfeed, but that serves a good purpose that isn't vanity or selfishness.


And yes, if I went to a muslim country and the women found it offensive what I wore and I could reach more for Christ by wearing a black robe I would wear it.

1 Corinthians 9
19Though I am free and belong to no man, I make myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. 20To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law. 21To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God's law but am under Christ's law), so as to win those not having the law. 22To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I might save some. 23I do all this for the sake of the gospel, that I may share in its blessings.


You don't have a very good grasp on what legalism is I'm afraid.
 
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
:amen: :preach: Glory to God! :clap:


Amsterdam legalizes street drugs, Canada legalized heroin clinics to oversee that people who use heroine shoot up correctly without causing aids, prostitution is legal in Amsterdam as well.
It's legal to commit abortion and partial birth in American culture, it's necessary to mutilate female genitalia in another country..

where do you want to go with how I need to follow other cultures to decide what's ok to do?
My morality and worldview is dictated by my Lord & Master, YHWY. NOT the world I live in.
 
Upvote 0

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You do not realize that your focus is on what you can and can't do, when it should be about how can you can serve the Lord better.

Romans 14:21
21It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother to fall.

If this is speaking of other Christian brothers, how much more so for those that do not know the Lord.

I would have to agree with nadine in this. The breasts are a sexual objects, and it's actually silly to deny this or ignore this fact. I have no desire to expose my privates to the public, but even if I did desire to do so, I would have no good reason or motives to do it (unless trying to attract attention from men, or vanity are good reasons) nor any reason to promote this behavior amoungst other christian women. Sure, I have exposed myself a little a few times... in order to breastfeed, but that serves a good purpose that isn't vanity or selfishness.


And yes, if I went to a muslim country and the women found it offensive what I wore and I could reach more for Christ by wearing a black robe I would wear it.

1 Corinthians 9
19Though I am free and belong to no man, I make myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. 20To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law. 21To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God's law but am under Christ's law), so as to win those not having the law. 22To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I might save some. 23I do all this for the sake of the gospel, that I may share in its blessings.


You don't have a very good grasp on what legalism is I'm afraid.
Exactly. As Paul gave us the guidelines, we're to 'become like them to win them', but that is not at the cost of committing sin or harming the witness of Christ.
It is within means - meaning, we do not waltz in proudly & arrogantly flaunting how different we are to bring attn. to ourselves unecessarily - however, we are still to stay within the guidelines of what is Godly and righteous as Christians.

So in order to witness to some prostitutes, it doesn't warrent wearing indecent outfits & pimping our bodies out to fit in with them to win them over. We find ways to make them comfortable with us while remaining in line with God's standards for us so they focus on GOD IN US/thru us - not ourselves outwardly - our appearance.

Great post, the focus is all wrong in this: MEism
 
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yep. Spot on.:thumbsup:


Exactly. As Paul gave us the guidelines, we're to 'become like them to win them', but that is not at the cost of committing sin or harming the witness of Christ.
It is within means - meaning, we do not waltz in proudly & arrogantly flaunting how different we are to bring attn. to ourselves unecessarily - however, we are still to stay within the guidelines of what is Godly and righteous as Christians.

So in order to witness to some prostitutes, it doesn't warrent wearing indecent outfits & pimping our bodies out to fit in with them to win them over. We find ways to make them comfortable with us while remaining in line with God's standards for us so they focus on GOD IN US/thru us - not ourselves outwardly - our appearance.

Great post, the focus is all wrong in this: MEism
 
Upvote 0

TheReasoner

Atheist. Former Christian.
Mar 14, 2005
10,294
684
Norway
✟37,162.00
Country
Norway
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
Though I would recommend, for purposes of broadening your horizons, to go outside the US more. Not that it will change your view. But it might teach you more about why others have their views.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
Though I would recommend, for purposes of broadening your horizons, to go outside the US more. Not that it will change your view. But it might teach you more about why others have their views.
I'd recommend more study in God's word and less focus on the WORLD around you.
The world won't be your judge, God will.

I know why the world has it's views & why they go 1/2 naked; God tells us many times over. They prefers flesh (carnality) over Spirit (over light and truth).
The condemnation is that men prefer darkness - this is what sets us apart from the world so we don't become like them.

The world will live in its chosen depravity; whatever it may be from country to country/ continent to continent, but they did that in biblical times too, and we have lots of scriptures of God talking about the judgment that will befall those cultures for their lifestyles and practices. Especially how they treated God's people.

I would still like to read all the prominant WORLD Christian leaders - top theologians thru the ages, church leaders, and see if they were all promoting public toplessness & nudity?
Where are the early church teachings on modesty? Are they condoning partial nudity? If not, why not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: D'Ann
Upvote 0

D'Ann

Catholic... Faith, Hope and the greatest is LOVE
Oct 28, 2004
40,079
4,130
✟87,336.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I have a question...

When Adam and Eve were first created, they were created in God's own image and they were nude. Once they ate of the "Fruit" tree, they became knowledgeable. They recognized that they were naked and thus they sought some coverings.

So in esence, in tribal countries who practice nudity due to their own spiritual beliefs... systems... community... etc... are innocent because they don't "recognize" that they are naked, therefore, they cannot be held accountable for their nakedness due to their naiveness, thus, they do not try to clothe themselves.

That being said...

Those of us who do not live in a "tribal community", what is our excuse? Once Adam and Eve were no longer innocent and once they became aware of their own nakedness, even they had the good common sense to seek some type of coverings.

I would also like to add that throughout history, there are tons of examples in how men and women dressed and in how they covered up their bodies within the early and current Christian world. Could you imagine Mary and Martha walking around naked and showing their boobs in public? I can't.

I'm not saying it's wrong to be happy and grateful for your body. I'm not saying that we should be ashamed of our bodies in public or privately... but I do believe that we should care enough and respect ourselves enough to cover up our bodies... in a modest way.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

D'Ann

Catholic... Faith, Hope and the greatest is LOVE
Oct 28, 2004
40,079
4,130
✟87,336.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
On the Apparel of Women

Book I

Translated by the Rev. S. Thelwall.
Waiving the Question of the Authors, Tertullian Proposes to Consider the Things on Their Own Merits

Grant now that no mark of pre-condemnation has been branded on womanly pomp by the (fact of the) fate of its authors; let nothing be imputed to those angels besides their repudiation of heaven and (their) carnal marriage: let us examine the qualities of the things themselves, in order that we may detect the purposes also for which they are eagerly desired.
Female habit carries with it a twofold idea— dress and ornament. By dress we mean what they call womanly gracing; by ornament, what it is suitable should be called womanly disgracing. The former is accounted (to consist) in gold, and silver, and gems, and garments; the latter in care of the hair, and of the skin, and of those parts of the body which attract the eye. Against the one we lay the charge of ambition, against the other of prostitution; so that even from this early stage (of our discussion) you may look forward and see what, out of (all) these, is suitable, handmaid of God, to your discipline, inasmuch as you are assessed on different principles (from other women),— those, namely, of humility and chastity.


Modesty to Be Observed Not Only in Its Essence, But in Its Accessories

Handmaids of the living God, my fellow-servants and sisters, the right which I enjoy with you— I, the most meanest in that right of fellow-servantship and brotherhood— emboldens me to address to you a discourse, not, of course, of affection, but paving the way for affection in the cause of your salvation. That salvation— and not (the salvation) of women only, but likewise of men— consists in the exhibition principally of modesty. For since, by the introduction into an appropriation (in) us of the Holy Spirit, we are all the temple of God, Modesty is the sacristan and priestess of that temple, who is to suffer nothing unclean or profane to be introduced (into it), for fear that the God who inhabits it should be offended, and quite forsake the polluted abode. But on the present occasion we (are to speak) not about modesty, for the enjoining and exacting of which the divine precepts which press (upon us) on every side are sufficient; but about the matters which pertain to it, that is, the manner in which it behoves you to walk. For most women (which very thing I trust God may permit me, with a view, of course, to my own personal censure, to censure in all), either from simple ignorance or else from dissimulation, have the hardihood so to walk as if modesty consisted only in the (bare) integrity of the flesh, and in turning away from (actual) fornication; and there were no need for anything extrinsic to boot— in the matter (I mean) of the arrangement of dress and ornament, the studied graces of form and brilliance:— wearing in their gait the self-same appearance as the women of the nations, from whom the sense of true modesty is absent, because in those who know not God, the Guardian and Master of truth, there is nothing true. For if any modesty can be believed (to exist) in Gentiles, it is plain that it must be imperfect and undisciplined to such a degree that, although it be actively tenacious of itself in the mind up to a certain point, it yet allows itself to relax into licentious extravagances of attire; just in accordance with Gentile perversity, in craving after that of which it carefully shuns the effect. How many a one, in short, is there who does not earnestly desire even to look pleasing to strangers? who does not on that very account take care to have herself painted out, and denies that she has (ever) been an object of (carnal) appetite? And yet, granting that even this is a practice familiar to Gentile modesty— (namely,) not actually to commit the sin, but still to be willing to do so; or even not to be willing, yet still not quite to refuse— what wonder? for all things which are not God's are perverse. Let those women therefore look to it, who, by not holding fast the whole good, easily mingle with evil even what they do hold fast. Necessary it is that you turn aside from them, as in all other things, so also in your gait; since you ought to be perfect, as (is) your Father who is in the heavens.

LINK
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Iskra

Newbie
May 7, 2008
67
5
Stockholm
✟22,712.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
We know the "culture" in most of the places you mentioned is highly sexual ALL the way around.

What highly sexual cultures are you talking about here? I can assure you that contrary to the old myth, scandinavia isn't that sexual as you might expect. The fact is that sex seems to play a much larger role in the public life in USA than it does in for exaple Sweden. With this I mean a sexual undertone that plays a important role in everything from commersials to music and movies and different products. Maybe this focus on nudity in USA is the result from a false modesty that makes nudity such a big thing.

It is if they do not do it to go to Church, work or school. Unlike "tribes", all of the people in the highly sexual countries where this is taking place that live in civilized societies, would not show up to work, Church or school in that state of "undress", therefore that appeal is still inapplicable.

Do you go to church, school or work in a swimsuite?


As to the base question. You argument as if it was a global truth that bare breasts are sexual in all contexts, this just isn't true. If you cannot understand this then it must be asumed that this is the result of severe uninterest for the world around you.

When Paul talked about decent clothing he meant that you should wear and behave in a way that isn't provocative and sexual to the people around you, and if bare breasts qualifies to this then it is decent, what is decent depends on culture and context. One hundred years ago decent clothing meant for exaple that you couldn't show your bare ancles. Today and in the society you live in bare ancle hardly is seen as indecent and sexually provocative, right? When the Bible was written decent clothing included that a woman covers her head, but you don't always wear a hat or veil, do you?
 
Upvote 0

IamRedeemed

Blessed are the pure in Heart, they shall see God.
May 18, 2007
6,079
2,011
Visit site
✟39,764.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
:amen::preach:


I'd recommend more study in God's word and less focus on the WORLD around you.
The world won't be your judge, God will.

I know why the world has it's views & why they go 1/2 naked; God tells us many times over. They prefers flesh (carnality) over Spirit (over light and truth).
The condemnation is that men prefer darkness - this is what sets us apart from the world so we don't become like them.

The world will live in its chosen depravity; whatever it may be from country to country/ continent to continent, but they did that in biblical times too, and we have lots of scriptures of God talking about the judgment that will befall those cultures for their lifestyles and practices. Especially how they treated God's people.

I would still like to read all the prominant WORLD Christian leaders - top theologians thru the ages, church leaders, and see if they were all promoting public toplessness & nudity?
Where are the early church teachings on modesty? Are they condoning partial nudity? If not, why not?
 
Upvote 0