Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I guess I can understand that, since "fox" is an obsolete term now.At my girlfriends house, the neighbor girls playing jump rope in the yard, said I was a fox.
XD tomato?I guess I can understand that, since "fox" is an obsolete term now.
They used to be called: fox, vixen, dame, doll, tomato and probably a host of other words.
He was fully human and thus a member of the family hominidae (the ape family) and fully divine.Are you saying Jesus wasn't fully human? or are you saying only women are apes? or both?
I thought women were foxes?
Then why did you say this?He was fully human and thus a member of the family hominidae (the ape family) and fully divine.
Not quite. His mother was an ape, that's all.
I thought the conversation was about Jesus?Because it's true. Mary was also fully human and thus also a member of the family hominidae. She was an ape.
Yes, he was a primate, just like you.I thought the conversation was about Jesus?
Was He or was He not a great ape?
Was He or was He not a great ape?
I hear an Arab phone ringing.Yes, he was a primate, just like you.
Only if you're ignorant on the science. The bible is myopic and can't answer this.I hear an Arab phone ringing.
Yes. "Great ape" is nothing but another name for members of the family hominidae.I thought the conversation was about Jesus?
Was He or was He not a great ape?
Yes, and a mammal and a vertebrate and a chordate and a...I thought the conversation was about Jesus?
Was He or was He not a great ape?
I did note just today that the Cassini probe may have picked up complex organic compounds... I wonder how they got there? - from Ocean spray on Saturn moon contains crucial constituents for lifeAs to your question --- your premise that there is only one planet in the cosmos creating life is flawed. You don't know that with any certainty. We are finding evidence of possible life on Mars and we know now that there are plenty of planets. I strongly suspect that life in some form may be present on many of them. Given time, I believe that the universe is "programmed" to produce life.
... Saviour?Yes, and a mammal and a vertebrate and a chordate and a...
Sudden changes in the fossil record are not missing evidence of gradualism; they are extant evidence of punctuation. Species are stable over long periods of time and so they leave plenty of fossils in the strata while in their stable state. The change from one species to another, however, happens relatively quickly (on a geological time scale) in a process called punctuated equilibrium.
Are there any actual theories about what the next phase of human evolution will be, even if it won't be seen for an extremely long time?All branches of science are based on theories, which are grounded in testable hypothesis and explain a large and diverse body of facts about the world. A theory is considered robust if it consistently predicts new phenomena that are subsequently observed. Facts are the world’s data. Theories are explanatory ideas about those data.
Whichever one is smallest viable population - Generally speaking, the smaller the population, the more dramatic the punctuated equilibrium effect is on it. That's generally why we see major shifts in the types of life we find after each major extinction event.How quickly is punctuated equilibrium? Which species that are not bacteria or a virus would be the fastest ones to go through punctuated equilibrium?
None that aren't already manifesting in a way - because there's no way to predict with fidelity a specific trait that will evolve and when (or if) it reaches fixation in the population. All we can determine is the amount of variation we will see in the genome - whatever trait comes out the other end is completely up for grabs (...or "God knows", if you're so inclined...).Are there any actual theories about what the next phase of human evolution will be, even if it won't be seen for an extremely long time?
No, you are hearing double-talk, that's what's causing the ringing in your ears.....I hear an Arab phone ringing.
Whichever one is smallest viable population - Generally speaking, the smaller the population, the more dramatic the punctuated equilibrium effect is on it. That's generally why we see major shifts in the types of life we find after each major extinction event.
Nope, not what the evidence indicates. In fact, we're undergoing another mass extinction now.... at a glacial pace, of course...Hmm, or maybe there have been six creation events with man being part of the sixth and five destruction's.
Nope! Again, even though there is a major shift at each of these extinction events, we still see the morphological changes firmly rooted in the pre-existing life forms that they derive from. Call it adaptation across generations if that makes it easier to accept.And don't you mean all new life appearing where it wasn't found before??? You can call it a shift if that makes it easier to accept.
Are all primates great apes?No, you are hearing double-talk, that's what's causing the ringing in your ears.....
Dogs. There is more variety than in nature because man brings together what would if left to occur naturally would take hundreds of thousands of years.
If left alone their would only be a few breeds of dogs, matching what we see in nature. But the point is that they are all still dogs, still the same species.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?