• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Tongues...probably everyone has already discussed this, but...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mathetes the kerux

Tales of a Twice Born Man
Aug 1, 2004
6,619
286
47
Santa Rosa CA
Visit site
✟8,217.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Only in understanding is there profitabilty? Um . . . that directly contradicts what Paul says! The speaker has NO idea what he/she says . . . yet for them personally it is edifying. Can't be much clearer than that.
 
Upvote 0

Mathetes the kerux

Tales of a Twice Born Man
Aug 1, 2004
6,619
286
47
Santa Rosa CA
Visit site
✟8,217.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Alright "no one" (oudeis ?) means NO ONE. NOT ONE UNDERSTANDS. Understanding is ONLY granted by the Spirit (hence the GIFT of interpretation) . . . and that is ONLY needed in the assembly since the usage is for edification OF THE BODY (in corporate).

If the tongue is spoken while alone . . . there is NO NEED for interpretation (but this doesn't mean that there won't be one . . . just that there doesn't have to be) and, watch this . . . THE ONE IS STILL EDIFIED yet there is NO understanding!
 
Upvote 0
D

Dave01

Guest
In Acts 2 those who heard and understood were the interpreters.

However, you guys go ahead with the discussion. This is one I withdraw from.

Well, that view here has no scripture support saying that there were people there interpreting what they said over in acts 2.

I'm not placing you on the firing line here, I'm just pointing out that the people around them heard them clearly in all these different natural languages that they spoke.
 
Upvote 0
D

Dave01

Guest


I've seen teaching like this before one time out of a person. That person was a oneness adherent I ran into on another board, who believed that unless The Holy Spirit came upon them to speak, they could not step out in faith and utilize the gift of tongues in their prayer language. And this seems to be what the guy is saying unless I'm viewing his amount of words incorrectly.
 
Upvote 0

JEBrady

Senior Member
Mar 24, 2006
1,756
87
NY
✟24,870.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married

Your series of posts were quite needed, and I just wanted to express my amen, my appreciation for your well-balanced and right-spirited response, and may God bless you and increase you.
 
Upvote 0

Mathetes the kerux

Tales of a Twice Born Man
Aug 1, 2004
6,619
286
47
Santa Rosa CA
Visit site
✟8,217.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Your series of posts were quite needed, and I just wanted to express my amen, my appreciation for your well-balanced and right-spirited response, and may God bless you and increase you.
No prob brother . . . we will see how he/she responds.
 
Upvote 0

dkbwarrior

Favoured of the Lord
Sep 19, 2006
4,186
511
60
Tulsa, Oklahoma
✟29,349.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Perhaps you should not draw such a clear line of demarcation.

Paul also says that the prayer tongue can be interpreted and not just (using your construct) the prophetic tongue.

I agree on your second statement. In fact, not only can the prayer tongue be interpreted, but on the other side of the coin, prophecy can also be prayer:

"Moreover David and the captains of the host separated... the sons of Jeduthun; ...under the hands of their father Jeduthun, who prophesied with a harp, to give thanks and to praise the LORD."
-I Chronicles 25:1,3

Here praise and thanksgiving are called 'prophecy' (in the psalmists sense) though both are given in the first person in the form of prayer.

Also, when John the Baptists father Zacharias' mouth was opened after the naming of John, the scriptures state that he was filled with the Holy Ghost and '...prophesied saying...'. What followed was a prayer of praise and thanksgiving in the form of first person prayer.

The thing to remember is that both prophecy as well as tongues are inspired utterances, the only difference is that one is in a language known to the speaker and the other is in a language that is not known to the speaker.

Prophecy happens to be predominately God speaking to man, while tongues are predominately man speaking to God. (After all, why have tongues and interpretation when one could just skip a step and prophecy?) But neither are just one way or the other.

Perhaps I will re-write my study guide to reflect this. However, the reason I left this information out of the guide originally was because of my desire to simplify the theology for the simple, or unlearned.

Peace...
 
Upvote 0
D

DreamerOfDreams

Guest
Speaking in tongues is universal to all humans. We all have spirits, we all have movements within our spirirts that cannot be expressed with articulate words, and we all express these inexpressable spiritual movements with soundings that approximate the intuited meaning of those spiritual movements.

There is nothing supernatural about speaking with tongues. It is we ourselves attempting to express the inner movements of our spirits. The supernatural element only occurs when God via His divine power of discrenment hears our soundings and looks into our hearts to retrieve the meanings.

Tougues as the "prayer language" of our spirits is gibberish. The words have absolutely no meaning whatsoever outside of our own generation.

Of course none of this pertains to the Holy Spirit enabled "diversities of tongues."
 
Upvote 0

Mathetes the kerux

Tales of a Twice Born Man
Aug 1, 2004
6,619
286
47
Santa Rosa CA
Visit site
✟8,217.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
We agree! Truly the broadest meaning of prophecy (in Greek) is ANY inspired utterance . . . in ANY direction . . . whether intelligible or unintelligible.
 
Upvote 0
D

Dave01

Guest
Prophecy happens to be predominately God speaking to man, while tongues are predominately man speaking to God. (After all, why have tongues and interpretation when one could just skip a step and prophecy?) But neither are just one way or the other.

Care to clarify your statement here? Tongues and interpretation, while used in a service by The Holy Spirit, is GOD talking to us.
 
Upvote 0

Mathetes the kerux

Tales of a Twice Born Man
Aug 1, 2004
6,619
286
47
Santa Rosa CA
Visit site
✟8,217.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Care to clarify your statement here? Tongues and interpretation, while used in a service by The Holy Spirit, is GOD talking to us.
His statement is drawn from the discussion of Paul concerning the ontology of tongues. Paul says that one who speaks in tongues speaks to God. Paul also says he will pray with the S/spirit (tongues) and pray with the mind also; a reference to tongues used corporately for the interpretation of the prayer tongue gives a blessing to the hearer.
And then Paul goes on to say that one who speaks in a tongue, if there is no interpreter present, must keep silent and speak to himself and to God.

BUT there is also the hint of tongues being used by God to address the congregation in Pauls citation of Isaiah. God says "I will speak TO this people . . ." regardless of context of the Isaianic passage . . . the gist is a message FROM God.

So 1 Cor. 14 refers to three directions . . . the vertical expression of tongues (to God) and the horizontal expression of tongues (to another believer who partakes in the vertical expression) . . . and the inverted expression (where God addresses His people).
 
Upvote 0
D

Dave01

Guest

Whoa wait a minute here, our prayer language, or the "speaking in mysteries" and "tongues of Angels" is not to be interepreted, because it is not done by The Holy Spirit, that is us stepping out in our faith and activating that gift.

I can do it at any place and anytime.

But the gift of tongues done by The Holy Spirit in a service is done by the anointing of The Holy Spirit, and the accompanying interpretation of it is by The Holy Spirit also.

Our prayer language is between GOD and us.



I'm not sure we are both on the same page here. Are you saying that our prayer language is to be interpreted somehow? If you are, I disagree.
 
Upvote 0

dkbwarrior

Favoured of the Lord
Sep 19, 2006
4,186
511
60
Tulsa, Oklahoma
✟29,349.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Care to clarify your statement here? Tongues and interpretation, while used in a service by The Holy Spirit, is GOD talking to us.


We agree. It's simply a matter of semantics...

I said 'predominately' man speaking to God. I was referring simply to volume of words spoken. While there are millions of believers who practice their private prayer language daily, speaking probably trillions of words a day in tongues, their are a much MUCH smaller number of tongues w/interpretation to the congregation in the same time period.

I'm not at all saying that God cannot or does not speak to the congregation directly through the means of tongues and interpretation. As MtK said of Paul quoting from Isaiah, with 'other tongues' will God 'speak TO' His people.

Add to that Peter on the day of Pentecost saying "This is that" which the prophet Joel prophesied, "your sons and your daughters shall prophesy". Here also prophecy is used to describe tongues when they are understood, even though in this case their was no interpreter present.

I'm really enjoying this discussion by the way, it's helping me develop my Guide to the Holy Spirit.

Peace...
 
Upvote 0

dkbwarrior

Favoured of the Lord
Sep 19, 2006
4,186
511
60
Tulsa, Oklahoma
✟29,349.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

That, my friend, is beautiful prose. May I use it?

Peace...
 
Upvote 0

dkbwarrior

Favoured of the Lord
Sep 19, 2006
4,186
511
60
Tulsa, Oklahoma
✟29,349.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I'm not sure we are both on the same page here. Are you saying that our prayer language is to be interpreted somehow? If you are, I disagree.


13Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may interpret.
14For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.
15What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.
16Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest? 17For thou verily givest thanks well, but the other is not edified.
-I Corinthians 14:13-17

The inference here is that the prayer language can and should be interpreted.

Kenneth Hagin made the statement that God would not ask one to pray for something that He would not grant. If one accepts that not everyone can operate in all of the gifts, then the 'interpretation' that all can pray for and all recieve is the 'interpretation' of the prayer language, not the gift that is elevated to the level of prophecy.

This is sometimes referred to as 'simple prophecy' as opposed to the 'gift of prophecy'. Its equal would be 'prayer tongues' as opposed to 'the gift of tongues'.

Peace...
 
Upvote 0
D

Dave01

Guest

That is because the gift of interpretation is normally used by The Holy Spirit during a service. It is a lesser type gift because it is dependant upon a message given in tongues first by The Holy Spirit. The tongues message with the following interpretation is equal to prophesy.


The reason there were no interpreters present as listed over in acts, was because of the particular type of tongue being utilized by The Holy Spirit at that moment. This was a tongue that was of a natural langauge being spoken. The people around them understood them in their own dialects, as written in scripture. This particular tongue still happens to this day.
 
Upvote 0
D

Dave01

Guest


Here is what Jesus said about it,..

6 (EMTV) But you, whenever you pray, enter into your room, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father who is in secret; and your Father, who sees in secret, will reward you openly.

I would seek further understanding in this area outside of Mr. Hagin. According to Jesus, prayer is not an open exercise in front of people, unless you do not want your prayers answered by GOD.

If you really want to see the gifts, spend some time at a good pentecostal church where The Holy Spirit is moving in the service. You will see all three of the vocal gifts in action and in orderly fashion. Everything should match to this scripture,..

26 ¶ (EMTV) What is it then, brothers? Whenever you come together, each of you has a song, has a teaching, has a tongue, has a revelation, has an interpretation. Let all things be done for edification.
 
Upvote 0

Mathetes the kerux

Tales of a Twice Born Man
Aug 1, 2004
6,619
286
47
Santa Rosa CA
Visit site
✟8,217.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Actually the Greek plays out that the tongues spoken in Acts 2 were the same tongues that Paul refered to.

If you would like I can break down the Greek? The picture is that all the disciples spoke in ecstatic tongues while the listeners each heard in their own dialect.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.