Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I find it somewhat ridiculous the claim that Fox leans right, and CNN leans left at least in equal measure. Fox at least allows a lot more on the left a platform to share their views as compared to CNN which very little if anything is allowed to go out as pro Trump.
I find it somewhat ridiculous the claim that Fox leans right, and CNN leans left at least in equal measure.
What are you talking about? You obviously don't watch Fox as they're talking about the aspects of it all the time.The President of the United States is currently under impeachment inquiry and new stories are breaking about it all the time. How much of that have you been seeing on FOX?
Shep Smith has been replaced with John Solomon of all people. No, I've watched some of the two networks' shows, and I don't find your statement credible based on what I've seen.I find it somewhat ridiculous the claim that Fox leans right, and CNN leans left at least in equal measure. Fox at least allows a lot more on the left a platform to share their views as compared to CNN which very little if anything is allowed to go out as pro Trump.
Who is calling for this "whistle blower" to be outed? And who has said that whistle blowers should not be questioned to determine the veracity of their statements? It's already been pointed out that the IG did question the WB's information and found it both credible and urgent. Furthermore, the CIA WB is reporting something he and and his colleagues considered illegal and corrupt while this WB is merely saying his boss is biased against someone who is accused of doing illegal and corrupt things in the country's highest, most powerful office. Do you honestly think there is any equivalence?I guess not everyone is on board with the idea that it is vital that the identity of a whistle blower never be revealed or that the whistle blower never be in a position to be questioned about where and from whom they got their information.
Their main point being that the Bidens are the ones who should be investigated and that Donald is being unfairly persecuted.What are you talking about? You obviously don't watch Fox as they're talking about the aspects of it all the time.
Who is calling for this "whistle blower" to be outed? And who has said that whistle blowers should not be questioned to determine the veracity of their statements? It's already been pointed out that the IG did question the WB's information and found it both credible and urgent. Furthermore, the CIA WB is reporting something he and and his colleagues considered illegal and corrupt while this WB is merely saying his boss is biased against someone who is accused of doing illegal and corrupt things in the country's highest, most powerful office. Do you honestly think there is any equivalence?
What are you talking about? You obviously don't watch Fox as they're talking about the aspects of it all the time.
What assumption are you referring to?That's quite an assumption to make. Why would anyone assume that?
Who are you talking about - O'Keefe or his source?Of course there is no equivalence. The one whistle blower is out in the open and can be judged by anyone as to his reliability and bias etc and has first hand evidence well documented. .
First, that's not accurate - part of his/her complaint is based on what colleagues have said and part is from actual knowledge. Second, it's not clear that the identity was withheld from the DNI - can you back that up?The other is being kept hidden to everyone but one IG and the Democrat leadership and has nothing but hearsay to base a complaint on .
Yes, one is tittle-tattle about bias, no illegality involved, while the other is of national importance and corruption in the most powerful office in the land.There certainly is no equivalence there at all.
That's not true! They also harp constantly on Biden and son.The only time they talk about it is to attack Schiff or the whistleblower.
I watch all the networks, and to claim that Fox is anything resembling fair and balanced (or even that it's more even than CNN) is utter nonsense.
That's not true! They also harp constantly on Biden and son.
The only time they talk about it is to attack Schiff or the whistleblower.
Their main point being that the Bidens are the ones who should be investigated and that Donald is being unfairly persecuted.
I missed how they covered Fiona Hill's testimony. What did they have to say about that?
And why shouldn't it be a major thing they talk about? Isn't that the Dem's that have brought this whole thing up? Upset that Trump had a line in his conversation about investigating the son of Biden? The nation isn't to become educated about every aspect of why they rightly should have been at least investigated in regard to the past of 2016?That's not true! They also harp constantly on Biden and son.
There's the talking about Schiff yes and about the whistleblower. Those are a big part of the story. But there's talk about the actual transcript as well, and I'm talking about the ACTUAL words not the yarn that Schiff made up. There's much talk about everything on Fox. Sorry but to suggest otherwise is pure hogwash.
I'm sure they stop to briefly whitewash the transcript as well.
They have laws about the whistleblower and the Democrats are going by the book as is the IG.That's quite an assumption to make. Why would anyone assume that?
Of course there is no equivalence. The one whistle blower is out in the open and can be judged by anyone as to his reliability and bias etc and has first hand evidence well documented. . The other is being kept hidden to everyone but one IG and the Democrat leadership and has nothing but hearsay to base a complaint on . There certainly is no equivalence there at all.
When does the DOJ get around to investigating the Biden’s?And why shouldn't it be a major thing they talk about? Isn't that the Dem's that have brought this whole thing up? Upset that Trump had a line in his conversation about investigating the son of Biden? The nation isn't to become educated about every aspect of why they rightly should have been at least investigated in regard to the past of 2016?
At least there is some progress being made by saying that CNN is at least left leaning. Won't be long until more people realize it is just a leftist propaganda tool used by the Democrat politicians.So what? All that would mean is that CNN leans left. How is that any different from FOX being tougher on Democrats than they are on Republicans?
It’s just a counterbalance to FoxBabeNews. If either of them are your main source ...At least there is some progress being made by saying that CNN is at least left leaning. Won't be long until more people realize it is just a leftist propaganda tool used by the Democrat politicians.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?