- Mar 26, 2018
- 1,080
- 280
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
That is honestly the silliest most pointless denial I’ve ever seen .
It is the OSU study and it is quite devastating to the birds from dinosaur theory. I also have what Alan Ferduccia found and that eliminates any chance of birds from dinosaurs.
Before I get into it...
How were your "dinosaurs" (actually birds) evaluated? From ornithologist and evolutionary biologist Alan Ferduccia and others the Chinese discoverers like Xian Xu used a software program to tabulate and compare the similarities and differences of the fossils. If one gave different weights to what constitutes a dinosaur and what constitutes a bird, the could have them come out all dinosaurs or birds. Of course, money and circular thinking ruled the day. People would pay more if these fossils were dinosaurs and not birds.
Also, your drawings are not representative and do not explain the parts of the bird. For those looking for the trademarks of a dinosaur on the legs, then they would see differences. I can tell these are all birds due to the high position of the knee. Birds use the leg portion beneath the legs to run and not so much the upper leg. Also, the feathers were drawn not as enhanced to show the leg like that of a dinosaur. On the bird, the feathers covered the upper leg portion.
Last edited:
Upvote
0