Three matrixiis and only one way of telling which one has the blue pill - confused?

[Gottservant]

Hi there,

So you, thought you were an intelligent philosophy understudy - are you confused by this question (I am not _____?):

Three matrixiis and only one way of telling which one has the blue pill (you must assume the other two are _____ _____ red) - does this confuse you?

Answers accepted in any order from, yes, to yes but less ("and"?) - thankyou.

 

[RC1970]

.

 

[Gottservant]

Hi there,

Please address the question - the alternative is to report you ("for no reason"?)

 

[GrowingSmaller]

Ok we have matrix a b and c. And I see a pill before me. The pill has an appearance (phenomenal colour) but you want the noumenal colour, its real nature, because that will make the matrix a better place to be...?

Red is danger, blue is pacific.

But you do not actually know what the outcome will be, and the world will transform should you take the pill. Theres no way back. We are at a matrix junction.

But why not just look on the box, and not overcomplicate things. If the paracetemol cures aches and pains, and the rennie cures heart burn, why not trust the pills description instead of being ultra skeptical?

Its like, "the chair may be a ghost, so I wont sit down." Well, it may, but we have experienced based reasoning which helps us through life on a daily basis.

 

[Gottservant]

I am basically just asking you whether you understand the difference, between taking a pill and the presumed direction of the maximum effect (of whatever the matrix could produce of a placebo, in principle).

I am sorry if that is too complicated for you.