Metal Minister
New Year, Still Old School!
CabVet said:
A request for the multiple definitions of evolution was requested, I simply obliged.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
CabVet said:Really, you want to go there? Posting synonyms of evolution? That is just precious. Did you know that the word "creation" has many meanings too?
Oh boy, you better get with loudmouth then because you guys are using different playbooks...his definition is a change in allele frequency within a population over time...not the same.
Meanwhile the recent events in the UN climate panel showing peer review to be very lacking puts the lie to this statement.
As does abiogenesis, yet most atheists will stick to it dogmatically.
There are more but I'm sure you get the idea...
A request for the multiple definitions of evolution was requested, I simply obliged.
You mean like how the definition of evolution changes from person to person, depending on the argument they're trying to win?
CabVet said:Oh my... Here, let me make this perfectly clear for you:
Change in allele frequency within a population over time =/= descent with modification.
CabVet said:Nobody asked for multiple definitions of the word "evolution". We asked you to substantiate this statement:
Which you did not.
There fixed it for you. One insinuates advancement, the other does not. I already saw loudmouth post that before, that change is alleles doesn't mean advancement, but I understand that evolution has an amorphous meaning...its kept that way so every time something else is discovered, regardless of what it may actually prove, evolution can take credit. Gee, whatever happened to natural selection being the driving force for evolution?
So showing you the multiple definitions isn't showing you the multiple definitions?
You mean like how the definition of evolution changes from person to person, depending on the argument they're trying to win?
CabVet said:Your statement was not that there were difference definitions. It was that evolutionists change their definitions to suit their needs. Want me to paste it again? Here:
CabVet said:Your statement was not that there were different definitions. It was that evolutionists change their definitions to suit their needs. Want me to paste it again? Here:
Maybe this will help...
It's a clear case of switching stances mid stream.
CabVet said:I went through the torture of watching the entire stupid video with silly repetitions to find out in the end that not once he changed his definition of evolution. Try again.
How many times a day, on this forum alone, do evolutionists conflate the idea of adaptations, or variations (minor change over time if It makes you feel better) with the unproved version which states we all came from a single cell? They are very different assertions no matter how much one wants to call them the same.
S...m...h...I never said he changed his definition, I was pointing out the fact that evolutionists do change their stance mid stream to win an argument. I'm trying to lead you carefully by the hand...
You mean like how the definition of evolution changes from person to person, depending on the argument they're trying to win?
Eight Foot Manchild said:You are still making a category error.
Multiple mechanisms (natural selection, mutation, etc.) encompassed in one theory. Not multiple theories.
Understand that now, and be at peace with reality.
Again I will say, there is a major difference between minor changes and the idea that we came from a single cell. The proof alone is like a crack in the sidewalk (single cell to all life) versus the grand canyon (minor changes occur). I'm also telling you that science, and scientists are not these paragons of perfect unbiased virtue. Their preconceived notions will always bleed through and taint there science, no matter what.
These silly Christians are always changing the definition of Christianity. One moment they're saying you need to accept Jesus, the next, they're telling you to turn away from sin, then they're telling you to love your neighbor...
So which is it? Clearly they can't make up their minds.
CabVet said:Yeah, and you are also telling us that people change their definition of evolution all the time to fit their needs, so there must be examples.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?