Gender dysphoria is the anxiety and distress a person feels due to a mismatch between their gender identity and their physical gender/appearance. When one's physical appearance is altered cosmetically to conform to the internalized gender image the distress goes away.
Except what you're missing is that studies show that transgender people actually have brains that structurally(and at times functionally)resembled the brain of the opposite sex. Also, you liken gender dysphoria to anxiety, which is a mental disorder...then say that surgery alleviates the disorder, when not too long ago you said that surgery doesn't affect mental illness(which is synonymous to mental disorder). Which is it?
you said: "If nothing was being forced of me, I would not mind the community as much." but you are now saying nothing is being forced on you
Let me clarify; nothing is being forced on me right now, because I haven't GIVEN anyone a reason to force anything on me; I comply and keep everything to myself, and don't question anyone openly unless it is in private with close friends. However, if you twisted my arm and asked me to answer honestly whether or not I felt socially threatened to publically share any of my opinions on trans/lgbt issues for fear of being harassed or losing my job; I would say absolutely 100% yes. I agonize over it quite often, actually, because I feel like I have to put on a 'mask' so nobody comes at me for having a different view.
not a disorder because there is no evidence at all to suggest it is.
All of the symptoms of it match that of a disorder. If it wasn't a disorder, transgender people would be nothing but a bunch of very advanced cross-dressers who actually don't feel distressed by being in their own body.
all the evidence shows that it is inborn. and genetics is only one part of being inborn.
The very definition of being 'inborn' is traits that are acquired before birth. Genetics determines the majority of what 'traits' we're born with, so I'm very confused as to why you'd claim this. Furthermore, as I said, we've only managed to prove that the existence of a 'gay gene' only includes factors that have around a 25% effect on people. Would you find the argument for gay rights less convincing if it WASN'T genetic?
like how they do with other minorities?
Minorites, majorities and everything in-between; everyone is a victim of this. I wouldn't be surprised if a boy fell on the street off of his bike, and some politicians started a war over it to push some agenda, honestly. Larger numbers won't make you any less of a 'sheeple'.
in response to the extremely hateful religious conservatives (not all of them of course) who have spent decades lying, attacking and demonizing the LGBT community claiming everything from demonic possession to spiritual sickness to an inability to love to claims about being pedophiles, murderers, diseased and bent on harassing everyone possible.
Well, for one the early movement was absolutely aligned with pedophilia at one point. I believe a very popular was sometime between the 70's-90's, in germany i think? Essentially the LGBT community hesitantly sided with pedophiles, can't remember what the reason was. And of course, since the LGBT community hasn't set up stricter guidelines for what they consider to be morally 'correct', pedophiles are popping out of the woodwork now more than ever demanding for the same respect. (A quick google search for 'MAPs on twitter' will inform you of this). Of course, I'm not saying LGBT people are pedophiles themselves; but with a track record like that, you can at least understand why some people could get that impression, especially when talking about it starts such a fierce defensive debate. And HIV is extremely common among the community, so that wasn't exactly a lie either.
Furthermore, it would also depend on what you consider 'hateful'. You and I can both agree that claiming someone is 'demonically possessed' is incredibly out of line especially for Christians, however, I'd say that this is likely a smaller percentage of religious folk seeing as I never, ever hear about those people in a positive light even from other Christians. Although what I've observed, something as neutral as simply having the audacity to question the community's validity in their claims or deciding to reject certain non-essential services due to religious beliefs(such as catering a wedding)is also considered, unfairly, by a number of LGBT folk to be 'hateful'.
Long story short; your statement is painting a large group with a very wide brush, and is not a valid argument.
I actually didn't see this. Not to be rude, but I haven't been keeping up with Carl's responses as I do not find them very 'fresh' in regards to the topic.
making the same claims about any other minority that are made about LGBT's would be considered hate,
The only claims being made in this thread is that trans people have a disorder that is not being treated very well socially or medically, and it needs to be fixed. Unless you see being black or handicapped as a disorder, that's completely irrelevant for you to say. (that was hyperbole; of course I don't think you actually see being black or handicapped as a disorder)
I'm starting to get the feeling you're also not here for an open discussion, are you? Because just like with KC, I will start ignoring you if you cannot have a fair conversation about this without all of the political jargon that, if I may add, may or may not even be how you describe. I don't want to be rude, but I only have so much time to discuss these things with people and I'd rather do it with those who are a tad more open-minded and less 'on the attack'.